Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013 Feb 15;304(4):H610-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00656.2012. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
To better understand the mechanisms contributing to reduced blood flow with age, this study sought to elucidate the impact of altered femoral perfusion pressure (FPP) on movement-induced hyperemia. Passive leg movement was performed in 10 young (22 ± 1 yr) and 12 old (72 ± 2 yr) healthy men for 2 min, with and without a posture-induced change in FPP (~7 ± 1 ΔmmHg). Second-by-second measurements of central and peripheral hemodynamic responses were acquired noninvasively (finger photoplethysmography and Doppler ultrasound, respectively), with FPP confirmed in a subset of four young and four old subjects with arterial and venous catheters. Central hemodynamic responses (heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, mean arterial pressure) were not affected by age or position. The young exhibited a ~70% greater movement-induced peak change in leg blood flow (ΔLBF(peak)) in the upright-seated posture (supine: 596±68 ml/min; upright: 1,026 ± 85 ml/min). However, in the old the posture change did not alter ΔLBF(peak) (supine: 417±42 ml/min; upright: 412±56 ml/min), despite the similar increases in FPP. Similarly, movement-induced peak change in leg vascular conductance was ~80% greater for the young in the upright-seated posture (supine: 7.1 ± 0.8 ml·min(-1)·mmHg(-1); upright: 12.8 ± 1.3 ml·min(-1)·mmHg(-1)), while the old again exhibited no difference between postures (supine: 4.7 ± 0.4 ml·min(-1)·mmHg(-1); upright: 4.8 ± 0.5 ml·min(-1)·mmHg(-1)). Thus this study reveals that, unlike the young, increased FPP does not elicit an increase in movement-induced hyperemia or vasodilation in the old. In light of recent evidence that the majority of the first minute of passive movement-induced hyperemia is predominantly nitric oxide (NO) dependent in the young, these findings in the elderly may be largely due to decreased NO bioavailability, but this remains to be definitively determined.
为了更好地理解导致血流随年龄减少的机制,本研究旨在阐明股动脉灌注压(FPP)改变对运动诱导充血的影响。10 名年轻(22±1 岁)和 12 名老年(72±2 岁)健康男性进行了 2 分钟的被动腿部运动,分别在 FPP 改变(~7±1ΔmmHg)和不改变的情况下进行。使用手指光体积描记法和多普勒超声分别进行了中心和外周血液动力学反应的逐秒测量,在 4 名年轻和 4 名老年志愿者中通过动脉和静脉导管证实了 FPP。中心血液动力学反应(心率、每搏量、心输出量、平均动脉压)不受年龄或体位影响。与仰卧位相比,年轻人在直立坐姿下的运动诱导的腿部血流峰值变化(ΔLBF(peak))增加了约 70%(仰卧位:596±68ml/min;直立位:1026±85ml/min)。然而,老年人的体位变化并未改变 ΔLBF(peak)(仰卧位:417±42ml/min;直立位:412±56ml/min),尽管 FPP 有相似的增加。同样,年轻人在直立坐姿下的运动诱导的腿部血管传导峰值变化比仰卧位高约 80%(仰卧位:7.1±0.8ml·min^-1·mmHg^-1;直立位:12.8±1.3ml·min^-1·mmHg^-1),而老年人在两种体位之间没有差异(仰卧位:4.7±0.4ml·min^-1·mmHg^-1;直立位:4.8±0.5ml·min^-1·mmHg^-1)。因此,本研究表明,与年轻人不同,增加 FPP 并不能在老年人中引起运动诱导充血或血管舒张的增加。鉴于最近有证据表明,年轻人在被动运动诱导充血的最初一分钟内,大部分是由一氧化氮(NO)依赖性引起的,这些在老年人中的发现可能主要是由于 NO 生物利用度降低,但这仍有待明确确定。