Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Medicine and Public Health, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Pain. 2018 Jun;159(6):1137-1146. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001198.
We assessed the effectiveness of a 6-month healthy lifestyle intervention, on pain intensity in patients with chronic low back pain who were overweight or obese. We conducted a pragmatic randomised controlled trial, embedded within a cohort multiple randomised controlled trial of patients on a waiting list for outpatient orthopaedic consultation at a tertiary hospital in NSW, Australia. Eligible patients with chronic low back pain (>3 months in duration) and body mass index ≥27 kg/m and <40 kg/m were randomly allocated, using a central concealed random allocation process, to receive advice and education and referral to a 6-month telephone-based healthy lifestyle coaching service, or usual care. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured using an 11-point numerical rating scale, at baseline, 2 weeks, and monthly for 6 months. Data analysis was by intention-to-treat according to a prepublished analysis plan. Between May 13, 2015, and October 27, 2015, 160 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention or usual care. We found no difference between groups for pain intensity over 6 months (area under the curve, mean difference = 6.5, 95% confidence interval -8.0 to 21.0; P = 0.38) or any secondary outcome. In the intervention group, 41% (n = 32) of participants reported an adverse event compared with 56% (n = 45) in the control group. Our findings show that providing education and advice and telephone-based healthy lifestyle coaching did not benefit patients with low back pain who were overweight or obese, compared with usual care. The intervention did not influence the targeted healthy lifestyle behaviours proposed to improve pain in this patient group.
我们评估了一项为期 6 个月的健康生活方式干预措施对超重或肥胖的慢性腰痛患者疼痛强度的有效性。我们进行了一项实用随机对照试验,该试验嵌入了澳大利亚新南威尔士州一家三级医院接受门诊骨科咨询的患者队列多随机对照试验中。符合条件的慢性腰痛患者(持续时间>3 个月)和身体质量指数≥27kg/m 和<40kg/m 的患者,使用中央隐藏随机分配过程,随机分配接受建议和教育,并转介至为期 6 个月的电话式健康生活方式辅导服务,或常规护理。主要结局是使用 11 点数字评分量表测量基线、2 周和每月 6 个月时的疼痛强度。根据预先发布的分析计划,按意向治疗进行数据分析。2015 年 5 月 13 日至 2015 年 10 月 27 日,160 名患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配至干预组或常规护理组。我们发现两组在 6 个月的疼痛强度(曲线下面积,平均差异=6.5,95%置信区间-8.0 至 21.0;P=0.38)或任何次要结局上均无差异。在干预组中,41%(n=32)的参与者报告发生不良事件,而对照组为 56%(n=45)。我们的研究结果表明,与常规护理相比,为超重或肥胖的腰痛患者提供教育和建议以及电话式健康生活方式辅导并没有使他们受益。该干预措施并没有影响针对该患者群体改善疼痛的目标健康生活方式行为。