Suppr超能文献

使用队列进行的随机试验:范围综述。

Randomised trials conducted using cohorts: a scoping review.

机构信息

Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 8;14(3):e075601. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075601.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cohort studies generate and collect longitudinal data for a variety of research purposes. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) increasingly use cohort studies as data infrastructures to help identify and recruit trial participants and assess outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the extent, range and nature of research using cohorts for RCTs and describe the varied definitions and conceptual boundaries for RCTs using cohorts.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were undertaken in January 2021 in MEDLINE (Ovid) and EBM Reviews-Cochrane Methodology Registry (Final issue, third Quarter 2012).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Reports published between January 2007 and December 2021 of (a) cohorts used or planned to be used, to conduct RCTs, or (b) RCTs which use cohorts to recruit participants and/or collect trial outcomes, or (c) methodological studies discussing the use of cohorts for RCTs.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted on the condition being studied, age group, setting, country/continent, intervention(s) and comparators planned or received, unit of randomisation, timing of randomisation, approach to informed consent, study design and terminology.

RESULTS

A total of 175 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. We identified 61 protocols, 9 descriptions of stand-alone cohorts intended to be used for future RCTs, 39 RCTs using cohorts and 34 methodological papers.The use and scope of this approach is growing. The thematics of study are far-ranging, including population health, oncology, mental and behavioural disorders, and musculoskeletal conditions.Authors reported that this approach can lead to more efficient recruitment, more representative samples, and lessen disappointment bias and crossovers.

CONCLUSION

This review outlines the development of cohorts to conduct RCTs including the range of use and innovative changes and adaptations. Inconsistencies in the use of terminology and concepts are highlighted. Guidance now needs to be developed to support the design and reporting of RCTs conducted using cohorts.

摘要

简介

队列研究为各种研究目的生成和收集纵向数据。随机对照试验(RCT)越来越多地使用队列研究作为数据基础设施,以帮助确定和招募试验参与者并评估结果。

目的

检查使用队列进行 RCT 的研究的范围、范围和性质,并描述使用队列进行 RCT 的各种定义和概念边界。

设计

范围审查。

数据来源

2021 年 1 月在 MEDLINE(Ovid)和 EBM Reviews-Cochrane 方法学登记册(最后一期,2012 年第三季度)进行了搜索。

入选标准

发表于 2007 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间的报告,包括:(a)使用或计划用于进行 RCT 的队列,或(b)使用队列招募参与者和/或收集试验结果的 RCT,或(c)讨论用于 RCT 的队列使用的方法学研究。

数据提取和综合

对正在研究的疾病状况、年龄组、环境、国家/大陆、计划或接受的干预措施和对照措施、随机分组单位、随机分组时间、知情同意方法、研究设计和术语进行了数据提取。

结果

共评估了 175 篇全文文章的资格。我们确定了 61 项方案、9 项单独队列的描述,这些队列旨在用于未来的 RCT、39 项使用队列的 RCT 和 34 项方法学论文。这种方法的使用和范围正在扩大。主题范围广泛,包括人群健康、肿瘤学、心理和行为障碍以及肌肉骨骼疾病。作者报告说,这种方法可以提高招募效率、更具代表性的样本,并减少失望偏差和交叉。

结论

本综述概述了为进行 RCT 而开发队列的情况,包括使用范围和创新变化和调整。突出了术语和概念使用的不一致性。现在需要制定指导方针来支持使用队列进行的 RCT 的设计和报告。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c49/10928784/b16d3b5d5be6/bmjopen-2023-075601f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验