Nieuwboer Minke S, Perry Marieke, van der Sande Rob, Maassen Irma T H M, Olde Rikkert Marcel G M, van der Marck Marjolein A
Radboudumc Alzheimer Centre, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 18;35(5):619-625. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy009.
As the number of patients with complex healthcare needs grows, inter-professional collaboration between primary care professionals must be constantly optimized. General practitioners (GPs) and community nurses (CNs) are key professions in primary care; however, poor GP-CN communication is common, and research into the factors influencing its quality is limited.
To explore patient-related GP-CN communication and facilitating and hindering factors, and to identify strategies to enhance this communication.
A qualitative focus group design was used to identify the facilitating and hindering factors and strategies for improvement. In a Dutch primary care setting, 6 mono-professional focus group interviews (3 meetings of 13 GPs; 3 meetings of 18 CNs) were organized between June 2015 and April 2016, recorded and transcribed verbatim. Two independent researchers performed the coding of these interviews, identifying their categories and themes.
Results show that, despite the regular contact between GPs and CNs, communication was generally perceived as poor in effectiveness and efficiency by both professions. Mutual trust was considered the most important facilitating factor for effective communication. Profession-specific factors (e.g. differences in responsibility and profession-specific language) and organizational factors (e.g. lack of shared care plans, no in-person communication, lack of time) may be of influence on communication. Participants' suggestions for improvement included organizing well-structured and reimbursed team meetings and facilitating face-to-face contact.
GP-CN patient-related communication benefits most from trusting inter-personal relationships. Inter-professional training programmes should address both professional and organizational factors and should be evaluated for their effect on quality of care.
随着有复杂医疗需求的患者数量不断增加,基层医疗专业人员之间的跨专业协作必须持续优化。全科医生(GP)和社区护士(CN)是基层医疗中的关键职业;然而,全科医生与社区护士之间沟通不畅的情况很常见,对影响其沟通质量因素的研究也很有限。
探讨与患者相关的全科医生与社区护士之间的沟通以及促进和阻碍因素,并确定增强这种沟通的策略。
采用定性焦点小组设计来确定促进和阻碍因素以及改进策略。在荷兰基层医疗环境中,于2015年6月至2016年4月期间组织了6次单一专业焦点小组访谈(13名全科医生参加的3次会议;18名社区护士参加的3次会议),进行了录音并逐字转录。两名独立研究人员对这些访谈进行编码,确定其类别和主题。
结果显示,尽管全科医生和社区护士之间有定期联系,但两个职业普遍认为沟通在有效性和效率方面都很差。相互信任被认为是有效沟通的最重要促进因素。特定职业因素(如责任差异和特定职业语言)和组织因素(如缺乏共享护理计划、没有面对面沟通、时间不足)可能会影响沟通。参与者提出的改进建议包括组织结构良好且有报销的团队会议以及促进面对面接触。
全科医生与社区护士之间与患者相关的沟通最受益于相互信任的人际关系。跨专业培训计划应兼顾专业和组织因素,并应对其对护理质量的影响进行评估。