• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Experiences of general practitioners participating in oncology meetings with specialists to support GP-led survivorship care; an interview study from the Netherlands.全科医生参与肿瘤专家会议以支持以全科医生为主的生存护理的经验;来自荷兰的一项访谈研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):171-176. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2018.1478960.
2
General practitioners' involvement during survivorship care of colon cancer in the Netherlands: primary health care utilization during survivorship care of colon cancer, a prospective multicentre cohort study.荷兰普通科医生在结肠癌生存者护理中的参与情况:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究结肠癌生存者护理期间的初级保健利用情况。
Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 18;36(6):765-770. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz028.
3
Primary care-led survivorship care for patients with colon cancer and the use of eHealth: a qualitative study on perspectives of general practitioners.以初级保健为主导的结肠癌患者生存护理及电子健康的应用:关于全科医生观点的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 28;6(4):e010777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010777.
4
Collaboration with general practitioners: preferences of medical specialists--a qualitative study.与全科医生的合作:医学专家的偏好——一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Dec 4;6:155. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-155.
5
Perceptions of shared care among survivors of colorectal cancer from non-English-speaking and English-speaking backgrounds: a qualitative study.非英语背景和英语背景的结直肠癌幸存者对共享护理的认知:一项定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 30;19(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0822-6.
6
Delivering colon cancer survivorship care in primary care; a qualitative study on the experiences of general practitioners.在初级保健中提供结肠癌生存者护理;全科医生经验的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jan 17;23(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01610-w.
7
Colorectal cancer survivors' experiences and views of shared and telehealth models of survivorship care: A qualitative study.结直肠癌幸存者对共同和远程医疗生存护理模式的体验和看法:一项定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2024 Jan;33(1):e6265. doi: 10.1002/pon.6265. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
8
Recruitment challenges to the I CARE study: a randomised trial on general practitioner-led colon cancer survivorship care.招募挑战的 I CARE 研究:一个随机试验的全科医生主导的结肠癌生存护理。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 24;11(8):e048985. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048985.
9
Experiences of hospital-based multidisciplinary team meetings in oncology: An interview study among participating general practitioners.肿瘤学中基于医院的多学科团队会议经验:对参与其中的全科医生的一项访谈研究
Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;23(1):155-163. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1323081.
10
Who should provide care for patients receiving palliative chemotherapy? A qualitative study among Dutch general practitioners and oncologists.谁应该为接受姑息化疗的患者提供护理?一项针对荷兰全科医生和肿瘤学家的定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Dec;36(4):437-445. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1535264. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective: a scoping review.从全科医学角度提高癌症治疗轨迹中护理质量的医疗实践:范围综述。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Mar;40(1):11-28. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2036421. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
2
Adapting patients' oncological treatment through remote participation of general practitioners in multi-disciplinary consultation meetings: A feasibility study.通过全科医生远程参与多学科会诊来调整患者的肿瘤治疗:一项可行性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec;28(1):15-22. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2021.2003775.
3
Adverse events of targeted therapies reported by patients with cancer treated in primary care.在初级保健中治疗的癌症患者报告的靶向治疗的不良反应。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec;26(1):202-209. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2020.1846713.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer survivors' preference for follow-up care providers: a cross-sectional study from the population-based PROFILES-registry.癌症幸存者对后续护理提供者的偏好:一项基于人群的PROFILES注册研究的横断面研究
Acta Oncol. 2017 Feb;56(2):278-287. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1267398. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
2
Integrating primary care providers in the care of cancer survivors: gaps in evidence and future opportunities.将初级保健提供者纳入癌症幸存者护理:证据差距与未来机遇
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jan;18(1):e30-e38. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30570-8.
3
The primary care provider (PCP)-cancer specialist relationship: A systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis.初级保健提供者(PCP)与癌症专科医生的关系:一项系统评价与混合方法的元综合分析。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):156-169. doi: 10.3322/caac.21385. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
4
'The emperor of all maladies': Towards an evidence-based integrated cancer survivorship care in general practice.《众病之王》:迈向基层医疗中基于证据的综合癌症生存护理
Eur J Gen Pract. 2016 Jun;22(2):69-70. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2016.1180361.
5
Learning the landscape: implementation challenges of primary care innovators around cancer survivorship care.了解全貌:基层医疗创新者在癌症幸存者护理方面的实施挑战。
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Feb;11(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0555-2. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
6
Primary Care Physicians' Perspectives of Their Role in Cancer Care: A Systematic Review.基层医疗医生对其在癌症护理中角色的看法:一项系统综述
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1222-36. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3746-7. Epub 2016 May 24.
7
Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Colon Cancer Recurrence: A Multicenter Cohort Study.有症状和无症状结肠癌复发:一项多中心队列研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2016 May;14(3):215-20. doi: 10.1370/afm.1919.
8
The role of the GP in follow-up cancer care: a systematic literature review.全科医生在癌症后续护理中的作用:一项系统的文献综述。
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Dec;10(6):990-1011. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0545-4. Epub 2016 May 2.
9
General practitioners' perceptions of their role in cancer follow-up care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands.荷兰的一项定性研究:全科医生对其在癌症随访护理中作用的看法。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2014 Mar;20(1):17-24. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2013.805408. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
10
Follow-up after colon cancer treatment in the Netherlands; a survey of patients, GPs, and colorectal surgeons.荷兰结肠癌治疗后的随访;对患者、全科医生和结直肠外科医生的调查。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;39(8):837-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 May 18.

全科医生参与肿瘤专家会议以支持以全科医生为主的生存护理的经验;来自荷兰的一项访谈研究。

Experiences of general practitioners participating in oncology meetings with specialists to support GP-led survivorship care; an interview study from the Netherlands.

机构信息

a Department of General Practice , Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands.

b Medisch Centrum Brielle , Brielle , The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):171-176. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2018.1478960.

DOI:10.1080/13814788.2018.1478960
PMID:29952234
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6032010/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to ageing, increasing cancer incidence and improved treatment, the number of survivors of cancer increases. To overcome the growing demand for hospital care survivorship by the involvement of the general practitioner (GP) has been suggested. Dutch GPs started a project to offer survivorship care to their patients with the help of monthly oncology meetings with hospital specialists.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the experiences of GPs with monthly oncology meetings in a GP-practice to support GP-led survivorship care of colon cancer patients.

METHODS

This is a qualitative study in primary care centres in a region in the Netherlands around one hospital. GPs were recruited from practices organizing monthly oncology meetings with hospital specialists. Ten of 15 participating GPs were interviewed until saturation. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and two independent researchers analysed the data.

RESULTS

The oncology meetings and individual care plans attributed to a feeling of shared responsibility for the patients by the GP and the specialist. The meetings helped the GPs to be informed about the patients in the diagnostic and treatment phase, which was followed by a clear moment of transfer from hospital to primary care. GPs were better equipped to treat comorbidity and were more confident in providing survivorship care. Due to lack of reimbursement for survivorship care, the internal motivation of the GP must high.

CONCLUSION

The oncology meetings fulfil the need for information and communication. Close cooperation between GPs and oncology specialists appears to be an essential factor for GPs to value GP-led survivorship care positively.

摘要

背景

由于人口老龄化、癌症发病率上升和治疗水平提高,癌症幸存者的数量不断增加。为了满足不断增长的医院护理需求,人们建议让全科医生(GP)参与进来。荷兰的全科医生通过每月与医院专家举行肿瘤学会议,开始了一项为患者提供生存护理的项目。

目的

评估全科医生参与每月一次的全科医生诊所肿瘤学会议的经验,以支持 GP 主导的结肠癌患者生存护理。

方法

这是荷兰一个地区的初级保健中心的一项定性研究,围绕一家医院展开。从组织每月与医院专家举行肿瘤学会议的实践中招募全科医生。15 名参与的全科医生中有 10 名接受了采访,直到达到饱和。采访记录被逐字转录,由两名独立的研究人员对数据进行分析。

结果

肿瘤学会议和个人护理计划使全科医生和专家对患者产生了共同的责任感。会议帮助全科医生了解了诊断和治疗阶段的患者情况,随后是从医院到初级保健的明确转移时刻。全科医生更有能力治疗合并症,对提供生存护理更有信心。由于缺乏生存护理的报销,GP 的内在动机必须很高。

结论

肿瘤学会议满足了信息和沟通的需求。全科医生和肿瘤学专家之间的密切合作似乎是 GP 积极重视 GP 主导的生存护理的一个重要因素。