• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实时超声引导下颈内静脉短期血液透析导管植入失败的原因

Reasons of unsuccessful implantation of short-term hemodialysis catheters in jugular veins using real-time ultrasound.

作者信息

Martins Marrocos Mauro Sergio, S Gentil Thais Marques, de C Lima Fernanda, R Laranja Sandra Maria

机构信息

São Paulo State Public Server Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2018 Sep;19(5):467-472. doi: 10.1177/1129729818759259. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1177/1129729818759259
PMID:29529916
Abstract

PURPOSE

Real-time ultrasound is indicated for hemodialysis catheters' insertion in internal jugular veins. We evaluated unsuccessful implantation of short-term hemodialysis catheters in internal jugular veins using real-time ultrasound between patients with and without previous short-term catheters.

METHODS

Observational open-label study of unsuccessful implantation of short-term hemodialysis catheters in internal jugular veins using real-time ultrasound from July 2013 to August 2014.

RESULTS

A total of 185 procedures were compared in 122 individuals; 120 (64.86%) had previously used short-term catheters. There were 5 (8%) unsuccessful implantation among 62 catheterizations without previous short-term catheter and 41 (33.6%) among 122 with previous short-term catheter (p = 0.001 Pearson's chi-squared, odds ratio = 5.77, 95% confidence interval = 2.15-15.50, p = 0.001). Non-progressing guidewire occurred in 2 (3.2%) of 62 patients without previous short-term catheter and in 18 (14.8%) of 122 with previous short-term catheter (p = 0.018 Pearson's chi-squared, odds ratio = 5.19, 95% confidence interval = 1.16-23.15, p = 0.031). No difference was observed between size of the veins with or without non-progressing guidewire. All 11 cases of venous thrombosis occurred in patients who had previous short-term catheter removed due to infection.

CONCLUSION

Previous use of short-term catheter is pivotal in the occurrence of unsuccessful implantation of short-term catheter in internal jugular veins using real-time ultrasound.

摘要

目的

实时超声适用于颈内静脉血液透析导管的插入。我们评估了在有或无先前短期导管的患者中使用实时超声进行颈内静脉短期血液透析导管植入失败的情况。

方法

2013年7月至2014年8月对使用实时超声进行颈内静脉短期血液透析导管植入失败的观察性开放标签研究。

结果

共对122例个体的185次操作进行了比较;120例(64.86%)曾使用过短期导管。在62例未使用过短期导管的插管中有5例(8%)植入失败,在122例曾使用过短期导管的插管中有41例(33.6%)植入失败(Pearson卡方检验p = 0.001,优势比 = 5.77,95%置信区间 = 2.15 - 15.50,p = 0.001)。在62例未使用过短期导管的患者中有2例(3.2%)导丝推进受阻,在122例曾使用过短期导管的患者中有18例(14.8%)导丝推进受阻(Pearson卡方检验p = 0.018,优势比 = 5.19,95%置信区间 = 1.16 - 23.15,p = 0.031)。导丝推进受阻的静脉大小与未受阻的静脉大小之间未观察到差异。所有11例静脉血栓形成均发生在因感染而拔除先前短期导管的患者中。

结论

先前使用短期导管是使用实时超声进行颈内静脉短期导管植入失败发生的关键因素。

相似文献

1
Reasons of unsuccessful implantation of short-term hemodialysis catheters in jugular veins using real-time ultrasound.实时超声引导下颈内静脉短期血液透析导管植入失败的原因
J Vasc Access. 2018 Sep;19(5):467-472. doi: 10.1177/1129729818759259. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
2
Longer duration of catheter patency, but similar infection rates with internal jugular vein versus iliac vein tunneled cuffed hemodialysis catheters: a single-center retrospective analysis.颈内静脉与髂静脉带隧道带涤纶套血液透析导管的导管通畅持续时间更长,但感染率相似:一项单中心回顾性分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Oct;47(10):1727-34. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-1089-7. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
3
An analysis of potential predictors of tunneled hemodialysis catheter infection or dysfunction.隧道式血液透析导管感染或功能障碍的潜在预测因素分析。
J Vasc Access. 2019 Jul;20(4):380-385. doi: 10.1177/1129729818809669. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
4
Studying alternative approaches for placement of cuffed hemodialysis catheters in hemodialysis patients with bilateral internal jugular vein occlusion.研究在双侧颈内静脉闭塞的血液透析患者中置入带 cuff 血液透析导管的替代方法。
J Vasc Access. 2019 May;20(3):250-259. doi: 10.1177/1129729818794414. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
5
Short-term infection in cuffed versus noncuffed small bore central catheters: a randomized trial.带囊与不带囊小口径中心导管短期感染:一项随机试验。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):203-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.10.020. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
6
Ultrasound-guided central venous tip confirmation via right external jugular vein using a right supraclavicular fossa view.通过右锁骨上窝视图,利用超声引导经右颈外静脉确认中心静脉导管尖端位置。
J Vasc Access. 2019 Jan;20(1):19-23. doi: 10.1177/1129729818771886. Epub 2018 May 3.
7
Impact of short-term hemodialysis catheters on the central veins: a catheter venographic study.短期血液透析导管对中心静脉的影响:一项导管静脉造影研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2004 Dec;52(3):293-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.12.004.
8
We still go for the jugular: implications of the 3SITES central venous catheter study for nephrology.我们仍直击要害:3SITES中心静脉导管研究对肾脏病学的启示
Kidney Int. 2016 Mar;89(3):522-4. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.01.003.
9
A modified de novo insertion technique for catheter replacement in elderly hemodialysis patients: a single clinic retrospective analysis.老年血液透析患者导管置换的改良从头插入技术:单中心回顾性分析
J Vasc Access. 2016 Nov 2;17(6):506-511. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000600. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
10
Tunneled internal jugular catheters in adult patients: comparison of outcomes in hemodialysis versus infusion catheters.成年患者的带隧道式颈内静脉导管:血液透析导管与输液导管的结局比较
Acta Radiol. 2007 Jul;48(6):613-9. doi: 10.1080/02841850701342104.