NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions at University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Public Health England, UK; University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Public Health England, UK.
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Aug;99(4):381-389. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
Following hospital outbreaks of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), Public Health England published a toolkit in December 2013 to promote the early detection, management, and control of CPE colonization and infection in acute hospital settings.
To examine awareness, uptake, implementation and usefulness of the CPE toolkit and identify potential barriers and facilitators to its adoption in order to inform future guidance.
A cross-sectional survey of National Health Service (NHS) acute trusts was conducted in May 2016. Descriptive analysis and multivariable regression models were conducted, and narrative responses were analysed thematically and informed using behaviour change theory.
Most (92%) acute trusts had a written CPE plan. Fewer (75%) reported consistent compliance with screening and isolation of CPE risk patients. Lower prioritization and weaker senior management support for CPE prevention were associated with poorer compliance. Awareness of the CPE toolkit was high and all trusts with patients infected or colonized with CPE had used the toolkit either as provided (32%), or to inform (65%) their own local CPE plan. Despite this, many respondents (80%) did not believe that the CPE toolkit guidance offered an effective means to prevent CPE or was practical to follow.
CPE prevention and control requires robust IPC measures. Successful implementation can be hindered by a complex set of factors related to their practical execution, insufficient resources and a lack of confidence in the effectiveness of the guidance. Future CPE guidance would benefit from substantive user involvement, processes for ongoing feedback, and regular guidance updates.
英国公共卫生部在 2013 年 12 月发布了一套工具包,以促进在急性医院环境中早期发现、管理和控制产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科(CPE)定植和感染。
调查对 CPE 工具包的认识、采用、实施和有用性,并确定其采用的潜在障碍和促进因素,以为未来的指导提供信息。
2016 年 5 月对国民保健制度(NHS)急性信托基金进行了横断面调查。进行了描述性分析和多变量回归模型,并对叙事性答复进行了主题分析,并使用行为改变理论进行了告知。
大多数(92%)急性信托基金都有书面的 CPE 计划。较少(75%)报告持续遵守筛查和隔离 CPE 风险患者的规定。对 CPE 预防的优先级较低和上级管理支持较弱与较差的合规性相关。对 CPE 工具包的认识很高,所有有 CPE 感染或定植患者的信托基金都使用了工具包,要么按照提供的方式(32%),要么为了告知(65%)他们自己的当地 CPE 计划。尽管如此,许多受访者(80%)并不认为 CPE 工具包指南提供了一种有效预防 CPE 的方法,或者遵循起来不切实际。
CPE 的预防和控制需要强有力的 IPC 措施。成功实施可能会受到与实际执行、资源不足和对指导效果缺乏信心等一系列复杂因素的阻碍。未来的 CPE 指导将受益于实质性的用户参与、持续反馈的流程以及定期的指导更新。