Suppr超能文献

掌骨第四、五掌骨骨折脱位采用掌板与克氏针固定治疗的回顾性队列研究。

Plate versus Kirschner wire fixation in treatment of fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture-dislocations: A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai 200233, China.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai 200233, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:293-296. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.052. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture-dislocations with unsatisfactory closed reduction commonly require later open reduction and internal fixation. However, the optimal method of internal fixation for these is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine through objective clinical measures which method is superior for fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture-dislocations: a K-wire or a plate.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of hospital records of patients who had received treatment for fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture-dislocations at one hospital between May 2007 and May 2015. A total of 86 patients who had received open reduction either with plate or K-wire fixation were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups of patients were collected. Patients received standardised clinical tests one year after fixation. Clinical outcomes included tests of grip strength and scores on the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand. Student's t tests and Chi-square tests were used to statistically evaluate whether plate or K-wire fixation was superior on the clinical variables.

RESULTS

The two groups were statistically indistinguishable on their demographic and clinical characteristics. Generally, the clinical outcomes of internal fixation were satisfactory. The average DASH and MHQ scores of the K-wire group were superior to those of the plate group (DASH 2.3 versus 9.8, P = 0.01; MHQ 96.7 versus 86.6, P = 0.02). Grip strength was not significantly different between the two groups (89.5 ± 5.8% versus 90.1 ± 4.9%, P = 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

This non-randomly controlled, retrospective study suggests that clinical outcomes after K-wire fixation is superior to plate fixation for fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture-dislocations. This is especially the case for hand functions related to work. The present results suggest that K-wire fixation is the gold-standard technique for the treatment of fourth and fifth CMC fracture-dislocations.

摘要

背景

第四和第五掌腕掌骨骨折脱位经闭合复位不满意者,常需后期切开复位内固定。然而,对于这些骨折脱位,哪种内固定方法最佳尚不清楚。本研究的目的是通过客观的临床测量来确定哪种方法对第四和第五掌腕掌骨骨折脱位更优:克氏针还是钢板。

方法

我们对 2007 年 5 月至 2015 年 5 月期间在一家医院接受第四和第五掌腕掌骨骨折脱位切开复位治疗的患者的医院记录进行了回顾性分析。共纳入 86 例接受钢板或克氏针固定切开复位的患者。收集两组患者的人口统计学和临床特征。患者在固定后一年接受标准化临床检查。临床结果包括握力测试和密歇根手功能问卷(Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire,MHQ)和手臂、肩和手残疾问卷(Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand,DASH)评分。采用 Student's t 检验和卡方检验统计评估钢板或克氏针固定在临床变量上是否更优。

结果

两组患者的人口统计学和临床特征无统计学差异。一般来说,内固定的临床结果令人满意。克氏针组的平均 DASH 和 MHQ 评分优于钢板组(DASH 2.3 比 9.8,P=0.01;MHQ 96.7 比 86.6,P=0.02)。两组的握力无显著差异(89.5±5.8%比 90.1±4.9%,P=0.36)。

结论

这项非随机对照、回顾性研究表明,第四和第五掌腕掌骨骨折脱位克氏针固定的临床效果优于钢板固定。这在与工作相关的手部功能方面尤其如此。本研究结果表明,克氏针固定是治疗第四和第五掌腕掌骨骨折脱位的金标准技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验