• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较手部和腕部固定中克氏针埋藏与外露感染率的前瞻性研究。

A Prospective Study Comparing the Infection Rate Between Buried vs Exposed Kirschner Wires in Hand and Wrist Fixations.

作者信息

Abdullah Shalimar, Soh Elaine Zi Fan, Ngiam Choong Jin, Sapuan Jamari

机构信息

Hand and Microsurgery Unit, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Mar 22;15(3):e36558. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36558. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.36558
PMID:37102015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10123197/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Kirschner wires (K-wires) are used in fracture fixations but are often associated with pin tract infections. This prospective study compared the infection rate between buried and exposed K-wires in closed injuries of the wrist and hands in individuals with no comorbidities.

METHODS

Fifteen patients were recruited with a total of 41 K-wires (21 buried K-wires; 20 exposed K-wires). Clinical and radiographic evidence of infection was assessed at three months based on the Modified Oppenheim classification.

RESULTS

Two out of 21 wires in the buried group developed grade 4 infection, while 20 wires in the exposed group did not have any significant infection. No significant difference in infection rate based on K-wire size or number in both groups.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in infection rate between buried and exposed K-wires in healthy individuals with closed injuries of the wrist and hand.

摘要

引言

克氏针用于骨折固定,但常伴有针道感染。本前瞻性研究比较了无合并症个体手腕和手部闭合性损伤中,埋入式克氏针与外露式克氏针的感染率。

方法

招募了15名患者,共使用41根克氏针(21根埋入式克氏针;20根外露式克氏针)。基于改良奥本海姆分类法,在三个月时评估感染的临床和影像学证据。

结果

埋入组21根克氏针中有2根发生4级感染,而外露组20根克氏针未发生任何明显感染。两组中基于克氏针尺寸或数量的感染率无显著差异。

结论

在手腕和手部闭合性损伤的健康个体中,埋入式克氏针与外露式克氏针的感染率无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c6/10123197/6fd7eef79c25/cureus-0015-00000036558-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c6/10123197/6fd7eef79c25/cureus-0015-00000036558-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c6/10123197/6fd7eef79c25/cureus-0015-00000036558-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
A Prospective Study Comparing the Infection Rate Between Buried vs Exposed Kirschner Wires in Hand and Wrist Fixations.一项比较手部和腕部固定中克氏针埋藏与外露感染率的前瞻性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 22;15(3):e36558. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36558. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Outcomes of an aseptic technique for Kirschner wire percutaneous pinning in the hand and wrist.手部和腕部克氏针经皮固定的无菌技术的结果。
Injury. 2021 Apr;52(4):889-893. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.060. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
3
Outcome of Buried Versus Exposed Kirchner Wires in Terms of Infection in Fractures of Phalanges and Metacarpal Bones of Hand.手部指骨和掌骨骨折中,埋藏式与外露式克氏针在感染方面的结局比较
Cureus. 2022 Feb 23;14(2):e22515. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22515. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
Incidence of Treatment for Infection of Buried Versus Exposed Kirschner Wires in Phalangeal, Metacarpal, and Distal Radial Fractures.指骨、掌骨和桡骨远端骨折中埋藏与外露克氏针感染治疗的发生率。
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Jul;42(7):525-531. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.040. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
5
Kirschner wire pin tract infection rates between percutaneous and buried wires in treating metacarpal and phalangeal fractures.治疗掌骨和指骨骨折时,经皮克氏针与埋头针的针道感染率比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006 Aug;16(8):518-20.
6
Exposed versus Buried Kirschner Wires Used in Displaced Pediatric Fractures of Lateral Condyle of Humerus.用于小儿肱骨外侧髁移位骨折的外露与埋藏克氏针比较
Indian J Orthop. 2018 Sep-Oct;52(5):548-553. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_295_17.
7
Buried or exposed Kirschner wire for the management of hand and forearm fractures: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.埋入式或外露式克氏针治疗手部和前臂骨折:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0296149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296149. eCollection 2024.
8
Comparing exposed and buried Kirschner wires in fixation for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: A propensity score-matched study.比较克氏针外露与内固定治疗小儿肱骨髁上骨折的疗效:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2022 Sep-Dec;30(3):10225536221125949. doi: 10.1177/10225536221125949.
9
Exposed versus buried K-wire fixation in paediatric lateral condyle humerus fractures: preliminary communication of a prospective comparative study.暴露与埋藏克氏针固定在小儿肱骨外髁骨折中的比较:一项前瞻性对照研究的初步报告。
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2022 May 1;31(3):281-288. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000880.
10
Percutaneous pinning for treating distal radial fractures in adults.经皮穿针治疗成人桡骨远端骨折
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 7;2(2):CD006080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006080.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation and Management of Complications Following Percutaneous K-Wire Fixation in Hand and Wrist Fractures.手部和腕部骨折经皮克氏针固定术后并发症的评估与处理
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025 Aug 30;7(6):100791. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100791. eCollection 2025 Nov.
2
Postoperative Management of Kirschner-Wire Fixation of All Phalangeal and Metacarpal Fractures at a Single Tertiary Care Center: A Retrospective Review.单一三级医疗中心对所有指骨和掌骨骨折采用克氏针固定的术后管理:一项回顾性研究。
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2025 Aug 8:22925503251363056. doi: 10.1177/22925503251363056.
3
K-wire Osteosynthesis of the Hand in the Outpatient Clinic: Assessment of the Infectious Risks.

本文引用的文献

1
Should we bury K-wires after metacarpal and phalangeal fracture osteosynthesis?掌骨和指骨骨折骨合成术后是否应该埋藏克氏针?
Injury. 2018 Jun;49(6):1126-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.02.027. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
2
Plate versus Kirschner wire fixation in treatment of fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture-dislocations: A retrospective cohort study.掌骨第四、五掌骨骨折脱位采用掌板与克氏针固定治疗的回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:293-296. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.052. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
3
A systematic review of the influence of burying or not burying Kirschner wires on infection rates following fixation of upper extremity fractures.
门诊手部克氏针内固定术:感染风险评估
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Mar 12;13(3):e6613. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006613. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
[Basic principles of surgical treatment of distal radius fractures].[桡骨远端骨折的手术治疗基本原则]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Jun;127(6):419-429. doi: 10.1007/s00113-024-01429-x. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
克氏针内固定上肢骨折后是否埋入对感染率影响的系统评价
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Sep;70(9):1298-1301. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.06.036. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
4
Incidence of Treatment for Infection of Buried Versus Exposed Kirschner Wires in Phalangeal, Metacarpal, and Distal Radial Fractures.指骨、掌骨和桡骨远端骨折中埋藏与外露克氏针感染治疗的发生率。
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Jul;42(7):525-531. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.040. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
5
The Rubber Stopper: A Simple and Inexpensive Technique to Prevent Pin Tract Infection following Kirschner Wiring of Supracondylar Fractures of Humerus in Children.橡胶塞:一种预防儿童肱骨髁上骨折克氏针固定后针道感染的简单且廉价的技术。
Malays Orthop J. 2015 Jul;9(2):13-16. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1507.006.
6
Kirschner wire pin site infection in hand and wrist fractures: incidence rate and risk factors.手部及腕部骨折中克氏针针道感染:发生率及危险因素
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016 Nov;41(9):990-994. doi: 10.1177/1753193416661280. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
7
Prevention of pin site infection in external fixation: a review of the literature.外固定中针道感染的预防:文献综述
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2016 Aug;11(2):75-85. doi: 10.1007/s11751-016-0256-4. Epub 2016 May 12.
8
Pin-site care: can we reduce the incidence of infections?针道护理:我们能否降低感染发生率?
Injury. 2015 Sep;46 Suppl 3:S35-9. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30009-7.
9
Pin site care for preventing infections associated with external bone fixators and pins.用于预防与外固定器和钢针相关感染的钢针部位护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 3;2013(12):CD004551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004551.pub3.
10
Exposed versus buried wires for fixation of lateral humeral condyle fractures in children: a comparison of safety and efficacy.儿童肱骨外侧髁骨折固定中暴露钢丝与埋藏钢丝的比较:安全性与有效性对比
J Child Orthop. 2011 Oct;5(5):329-33. doi: 10.1007/s11832-011-0358-y. Epub 2011 Jul 28.