Suppr超能文献

在社交饮酒者中,针对与酒精相关刺激的注意偏向检验暴露频率假说。

Testing a frequency of exposure hypothesis in attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli amongst social drinkers.

作者信息

Albery Ian P, Sharma Dinkar, Noyce Simon, Frings Daniel, Moss Antony C

机构信息

Division of Psychology, London South Bank University, UK.

School of Psychology, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.

出版信息

Addict Behav Rep. 2015 May 7;1:68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2015.05.001. eCollection 2015 Jun.

Abstract

AIMS

To examine whether a group of social drinkers showed longer response latencies to alcohol-related stimuli than neutral stimuli and to test whether exposure to 1) an alcohol-related environment and 2) consumption related cues influenced the interference from alcohol-related stimuli.

METHODS

A 2 × 2 × 2 × 5 factorial design with Exposure Group (high, low) and Consumption Group (high, low) as between-participant factors and Word Type (alcohol, neutral) and Block (1-5) as within-participant factors was used. Forty-three undergraduate university students, 21 assigned to a high exposure group and 22 to a low exposure group, took part in the experiment. Exposure Group was defined according to whether or not participants currently worked in a bar or pub. Consumption Group was defined according to a median split on a quantity-frequency measure derived from two questions of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) questionnaire. A modified computerised Stroop colour naming test was used to measure response latencies.

RESULTS

Exposure and consumption factors interacted to produce greater interference from alcohol-related stimuli. In particular, the low consumption group showed interference from alcohol-related stimuli only in the high exposure condition. Exposure did not affect the magnitude of interference in the high consumption group.

CONCLUSIONS

Attentional bias is dependent upon exposure to distinct types of alcohol-related cues.

摘要

目的

研究一组社交饮酒者对与酒精相关的刺激的反应潜伏期是否比对中性刺激的反应潜伏期更长,并测试接触1)与酒精相关的环境和2)消费相关线索是否会影响来自与酒精相关刺激的干扰。

方法

采用2×2×2×5析因设计,将暴露组(高、低)和消费组(高、低)作为组间因素,单词类型(酒精、中性)和区组(1-5)作为组内因素。43名本科大学生参与了实验,其中21人被分配到高暴露组,22人被分配到低暴露组。暴露组根据参与者目前是否在酒吧或酒馆工作来定义。消费组根据从酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)问卷的两个问题得出的数量-频率测量的中位数分割来定义。使用改良的计算机化斯特鲁普颜色命名测试来测量反应潜伏期。

结果

暴露和消费因素相互作用,产生了来自与酒精相关刺激的更大干扰。特别是,低消费组仅在高暴露条件下表现出来自与酒精相关刺激的干扰。暴露对高消费组的干扰程度没有影响。

结论

注意偏向取决于对不同类型与酒精相关线索的暴露。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1059/5845920/d1915ad75cc2/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Testing a frequency of exposure hypothesis in attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli amongst social drinkers.
Addict Behav Rep. 2015 May 7;1:68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2015.05.001. eCollection 2015 Jun.
2
Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers.
Addiction. 2001 Feb;96(2):285-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96228512.x.
3
Alcohol-related attentional bias in a gaze contingency task: Comparing appetitive and non-appetitive cues.
Addict Behav. 2019 Mar;90:312-317. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.11.034. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
4
Attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli among belief based and non-belief based non-drinkers.
Eur Addict Res. 2013;19(6):299-302. doi: 10.1159/000348426. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
5
Where's the wine? Heavy social drinkers show attentional bias towards alcohol in a visual conjunction search task.
Addiction. 2020 Sep;115(9):1650-1659. doi: 10.1111/add.14997. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
6
Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers.
J Behav Health. 2013;2(2):112-119. doi: 10.5455/jbh.20130224082728.
7
Attentional bias to alcohol stimuli predicts elevated cue-induced craving in young adult social drinkers.
Addict Behav. 2017 Jul;70:14-17. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.01.035. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
8
Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 Aug;157(1):67-74. doi: 10.1007/s002130100764.
9
Acute alcohol effects on attentional bias in heavy and moderate drinkers.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Mar;27(1):32-41. doi: 10.1037/a0028991. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
10
The priming effect of alcohol pre-load on attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Nov;176(3-4):353-61. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1906-7. Epub 2004 May 26.

引用本文的文献

2
Does auditory attentional bias determine craving for methamphetamine? A pilot study using a word recognition dichotic listening task.
Heliyon. 2022 Oct 31;8(11):e11311. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11311. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Evidence for incentive salience sensitization as a pathway to alcohol use disorder.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Dec;107:897-926. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
4
Light social drinkers are more distracted by irrelevant information from an induced attentional bias than heavy social drinkers.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Oct;235(10):2967-2978. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4987-4. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
5
Age-related differences in alcohol attention bias: a cross-sectional study.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Aug;235(8):2387-2393. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4935-3. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
6
Exploring the alcohol-behaviour link: Myopic self-enhancement in the absence of alcohol consumption as a function of past alcohol use.
Addict Behav Rep. 2016 Jul 28;4:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2016.07.002. eCollection 2016 Dec.
7
Smells like inhibition: The effects of olfactory and visual alcohol cues on inhibitory control.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Apr;233(8):1331-7. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4221-1. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli among belief based and non-belief based non-drinkers.
Eur Addict Res. 2013;19(6):299-302. doi: 10.1159/000348426. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
2
Initial orienting towards sexually relevant stimuli: preliminary evidence from eye movement measures.
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Aug;41(4):919-28. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9816-3. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
3
Development of a repeated measures affective change blindness task.
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):826-33. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0072-1.
5
A dual-process model of the alcohol-behavior link for social drinking.
Psychol Bull. 2009 Jul;135(4):516-30. doi: 10.1037/a0015991.
6
Attentional bias training and cue reactivity in cigarette smokers.
Addiction. 2008 Nov;103(11):1875-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02335.x.
7
The addiction Stroop task: examining the fast and slow effects of smoking and marijuana-related cues.
J Psychopharmacol. 2009 Jul;23(5):510-9. doi: 10.1177/0269881108091253. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
8
Attentional re-training decreases attentional bias in heavy drinkers without generalization.
Addiction. 2007 Mar;102(3):399-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01718.x.
9
Attentional bias predicts heroin relapse following treatment.
Addiction. 2006 Sep;101(9):1306-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01498.x.
10
The addiction-stroop test: Theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations.
Psychol Bull. 2006 May;132(3):443-76. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.443.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验