• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对比既往慢性肾脏病患者中机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术的术后功能结局:一项多中心研究。

Comparison of functional outcomes of robotic and open partial nephrectomy in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease: a multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla, CA, 93093-0987, USA.

Department of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2018 Aug;36(8):1255-1262. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2261-3. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2261-3
PMID:29532222
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compared renal functional outcomes of robotic (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), a definite indication for nephron-sparing surgery.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective analysis of OPN and RPN in patients with baseline ≥ CKD Stage III [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m] was performed. Primary outcome was change in eGFR (ΔeGFR, mL/min/1.73 m) between preoperative and last follow-up with respect to RENAL nephrometry score group [simple (4-6), intermediate (7-9), complex (10-12)]. Secondary outcomes included eGFR decline > 50%.

RESULTS

728 patients (426 OPN, 302 RPN, mean follow-up 33.3 months) were analyzed. Similar RENAL score distribution (p = 0.148) was noted between groups. RPN had lower median estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), and hospital stay (3 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). Median ischemia time (OPN 23.7 vs. RPN 21.5 min, p = 0.089), positive margin (p = 0.256), transfusion (p = 0.166), and 30-day complications (p = 0.208) were similar. For OPN vs. RPN, mean ΔeGFR demonstrated no significant difference for simple (0.5 vs. 0.3, p = 0.328), intermediate (2.1 vs. 2.1, p = 0.384), and complex (4.9 vs. 6.1, p = 0.108). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that decreasing preoperative eGFR (OR 1.10, p = 0.001) and complex RENAL score (OR 5.61, p = 0.03) were independent predictors for eGFR decline > 50%. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated 5-year freedom from eGFR decline > 50% of 88.6% for OPN and 88.3% for RPN (p = 0.724).

CONCLUSIONS

RPN and OPN demonstrated similar renal functional outcomes when stratified by tumor complexity group. Increasing tumor age and tumor complexity were primary drivers associated with functional decline. RPN provides similar renal functional outcomes to OPN in appropriately selected patients.

摘要

背景

我们比较了机器人辅助肾部分切除术(RPN)和开放性肾部分切除术(OPN)在慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中的肾功能结果,CKD 是保肾手术的明确适应证。

方法

对基线 CKD Ⅲ期[估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)<60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ]的 OPN 和 RPN 患者进行了多中心回顾性分析。主要结局是根据 RENAL 肾肿瘤评分[简单(4-6 分)、中度(7-9 分)、复杂(10-12 分)]比较术前和末次随访时 eGFR 的变化(ΔeGFR,mL/min/1.73 m 2 )。次要结局包括 eGFR 下降>50%。

结果

共分析了 728 例患者(426 例行 OPN,302 例行 RPN,平均随访 33.3 个月)。两组的 RENAL 评分分布相似(p=0.148)。RPN 的中位估计失血量(p<0.001)和住院时间(3 天比 5 天,p<0.001)较低。中位缺血时间(OPN 23.7 分钟比 RPN 21.5 分钟,p=0.089)、阳性切缘(p=0.256)、输血(p=0.166)和 30 天并发症(p=0.208)相似。对于 OPN 与 RPN,简单(0.5 比 0.3,p=0.328)、中度(2.1 比 2.1,p=0.384)和复杂(4.9 比 6.1,p=0.108)肿瘤的平均ΔeGFR 无显著差异。Cox 回归分析表明,术前 eGFR 降低(OR 1.10,p=0.001)和复杂 RENAL 评分(OR 5.61,p=0.03)是 eGFR 下降>50%的独立预测因素。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,OPN 和 RPN 的 5 年 eGFR 下降>50%的无事件率分别为 88.6%和 88.3%(p=0.724)。

结论

在肿瘤复杂性分组的情况下,RPN 和 OPN 的肾功能结果相似。肿瘤年龄和肿瘤复杂性的增加是与功能下降相关的主要驱动因素。在适当选择的患者中,RPN 可为患者提供与 OPN 相似的肾功能结果。

相似文献

1
Comparison of functional outcomes of robotic and open partial nephrectomy in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease: a multicenter study.对比既往慢性肾脏病患者中机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术的术后功能结局:一项多中心研究。
World J Urol. 2018 Aug;36(8):1255-1262. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2261-3. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
2
Robotic partial nephrectomy for clinical T2a renal mass is associated with improved trifecta outcome compared to open partial nephrectomy: a single surgeon comparative analysis.机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗 T2a 期临床肾肿瘤与开放部分肾切除术相比,三重点结局改善:单外科医生的比较分析。
World J Urol. 2020 May;38(5):1113-1122. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02994-2. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
3
Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a matched-pair comparison with a long-term follow-up.机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术治疗复杂肾肿瘤:长期随访的配对比较
World J Urol. 2017 Jan;35(1):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1849-8. Epub 2016 May 19.
4
Is Extensive Parenchymal Resection During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Justified? A Match-Paired Comparison of Two Extirpative Surgical Modalities for Treatment of a Complex Renal Neoplasm.机器人辅助部分肾切除术中广泛实质切除是否合理?两种治疗复杂肾肿瘤的切除性手术方式的配对比较。
J Endourol. 2016 Apr;30(4):379-83. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0510. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
5
Nephrometry score matched robotic vs. laparoscopic vs. open partial nephrectomy.肾计量评分匹配的机器人辅助与腹腔镜与开放性肾部分切除术对比
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):679-685. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0801-x. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
6
Comparison of 1800 Robotic and Open Partial Nephrectomies for Renal Tumors.1800例机器人辅助与开放性肾部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤的比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(13):4277-4283. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5411-0. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
7
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with baseline chronic kidney disease: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis.机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗基线慢性肾脏病患者:多机构倾向评分匹配分析。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1205-10. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
8
Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity tumors: a matched-pairs comparison of surgical outcomes at a single institution.机器人辅助与开放部分肾切除术治疗中高危复杂性肿瘤:单中心回顾性配对研究比较手术结局。
Scand J Urol. 2020 Aug;54(4):313-317. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2020.1765017. Epub 2020 May 13.
9
Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass.机器人辅助部分肾切除术与腹腔镜冷冻消融术治疗小肾肿瘤的比较。
Eur Urol. 2012 May;61(5):899-904. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
10
Is Off Clamp Always Beneficial During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy? A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Clamp Technique in Patients with Two Kidneys.机器人辅助部分肾切除术期间松开肾蒂总是有益的吗?对双肾患者钳夹技术的倾向评分匹配比较。
J Endourol. 2017 Nov;31(11):1176-1182. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0450.

引用本文的文献

1
Endovascular control during partial nephrectomy in a renal allograft.肾移植肾部分切除术中的血管内控制
Indian J Urol. 2022 Jul-Sep;38(3):227-229. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_38_22. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
2
Perioperative and long-term functional outcomes of robot-assisted versus open partial nephrectomy: A single-center retrospective study of a Japanese cohort.机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术的围手术期及长期功能结局:一项针对日本队列的单中心回顾性研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Mar 8;75:103482. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103482. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
External Validation of a Novel Comprehensive Trifecta System in Predicting Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of Partial Nephrectomy: Results of a Multicentric Series.

本文引用的文献

1
'Trifecta' outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in solitary kidney: a Vattikuti Collective Quality Initiative (VCQI) database analysis.孤立肾机器人辅助部分肾切除术的“三连胜”结局:Vattikuti集体质量改进计划(VCQI)数据库分析
BJU Int. 2018 Jan;121(1):119-123. doi: 10.1111/bju.13967. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
2
Renal Preservation and Partial Nephrectomy: Patient and Surgical Factors.肾脏保存与肾部分切除术:患者因素与手术因素
Eur Urol Focus. 2016 Dec 15;2(6):589-600. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
3
Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for Pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes.
一种新型综合三联征系统预测部分肾切除术肿瘤学和功能结局的外部验证:多中心系列研究结果
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 1;11(3):796. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030796.
比较后腹腔与经腹腔机器人辅助部分肾切除术对 Pentafecta 围手术期和肾功能的影响。
World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1721-1728. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2062-0. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
4
Estimated glomerular filtration rate, renal scan and volumetric assessment of the kidney before and after partial nephrectomy: a review of the current literature.肾部分切除术前及术后的估计肾小球滤过率、肾脏扫描及肾脏容积评估:当前文献综述
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Dec;69(6):539-547. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02865-X. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
5
Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy in patients with chronic kidney disease: A propensity score-matched comparative analysis of surgical outcomes.慢性肾脏病患者机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:手术结局的倾向评分匹配比较分析
Int J Urol. 2017 Jul;24(7):505-510. doi: 10.1111/iju.13363. Epub 2017 May 14.
6
Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: AUA Guideline.肾脏肿块和局限性肾细胞癌:AUA 指南。
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):520-529. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.100. Epub 2017 May 4.
7
Survival and Functional Stability in Chronic Kidney Disease Due to Surgical Removal of Nephrons: Importance of the New Baseline Glomerular Filtration Rate.由于肾单位切除导致的慢性肾脏病的生存和功能稳定性:新的肾小球滤过率基线的重要性。
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):996-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.043. Epub 2015 May 23.
8
EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.EAU 指南:肾细胞癌. 2014 年更新版.
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):913-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
9
Evaluation of national trends in the utilization of partial nephrectomy in relation to the publication of the American Urologic Association guidelines for the management of clinical T1 renal masses.评估与美国泌尿外科学会临床T1期肾肿块管理指南发布相关的部分肾切除术使用的全国趋势。
BMC Urol. 2014 Dec 17;14:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-101.
10
Nephron-sparing techniques independently decrease the risk of cardiovascular events relative to radical nephrectomy in patients with a T1a-T1b renal mass and normal preoperative renal function.保肾技术独立于根治性肾切除术降低 T1a-T1b 期肾肿瘤和术前肾功能正常患者的心血管事件风险。
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.027. Epub 2014 Oct 3.