Vu Erik N, Wan Wilson C Y, Yeung Titus C, Callaway David W
J Spec Oper Med. 2018 Spring;18(1):62-68. doi: 10.55460/PLW2-KN9Z.
Uncontrolled hemorrhage remains a leading cause of preventable death in tactical and combat settings. Alternate routes of delivery of tranexamic acid (TXA), an adjunct in the management of hemorrhagic shock, are being studied. A working group for the Committee for Tactical Emergency Casualty Care reviewed the available evidence on the potential role for intramuscular (IM) administration of TXA in nonhospital settings as soon as possible from the point of injury.
EMBASE and MEDLINE/PubMed databases were sequentially searched by medical librarians for evidence of TXA use in the following contexts and/or using the following keywords: prehospital, trauma, hemorrhagic shock, optimal timing, optimal dose, safe volume, incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), IM bioavailability.
A total of 183 studies were reviewed. The strength of the available data was variable, generally weak in quality, and included laboratory research, case reports, retrospective observational reviews, and few prospective studies. Current volume and concentrations of available formulations of TXA make it, in theory, amenable to IM injection. Current bestpractice guidelines for large-volume injection (i.e., 5mL) support IM administration in four locations in the adult human body. One case series suggests complete bioavailability of IM TXA in healthy patients. Data are lacking on the efficacy and safety of IM TXA in hemorrhagic shock.
There is currently insufficient evidence to support a strong recommendation for or against IM administration of TXA in the combat setting; however, there is an abundance of literature demonstrating efficacy and safety of TXA use in a broad range of patient populations. Balancing the available data and risk- benefit ratio, IM TXA should be considered a viable treatment option for tactical and combat applications. Additional studies should focus on the optimal dose and bioavailability of IM dosing of patients in hemorrhagic shock, with assessment of potential downstream sequelae.
在战术和战斗环境中,无法控制的出血仍然是可预防死亡的主要原因。目前正在研究氨甲环酸(TXA)(一种用于失血性休克治疗的辅助药物)的替代给药途径。战术紧急伤亡护理委员会的一个工作组尽快审查了关于在非医院环境中受伤后尽早肌肉注射(IM)TXA的潜在作用的现有证据。
医学图书馆员依次检索EMBASE和MEDLINE/PubMed数据库,以查找在以下背景下使用TXA和/或使用以下关键词的证据:院前、创伤、失血性休克、最佳时机、最佳剂量、安全容量、静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)发生率、IM生物利用度。
共审查了183项研究。现有数据的强度各不相同,质量普遍较弱,包括实验室研究、病例报告、回顾性观察性综述,前瞻性研究较少。目前TXA现有制剂的体积和浓度在理论上使其适合肌肉注射。目前关于大容量注射(即5mL)的最佳实践指南支持在成人体表四个部位进行肌肉注射。一个病例系列表明健康患者中IM TXA具有完全生物利用度。缺乏关于IM TXA在失血性休克中的疗效和安全性的数据。
目前没有足够的证据支持在战斗环境中强烈推荐或反对IM注射TXA;然而,有大量文献证明TXA在广泛患者群体中的疗效和安全性。权衡现有数据和风险效益比,IM TXA应被视为战术和战斗应用中的一种可行治疗选择。更多研究应关注失血性休克患者IM给药的最佳剂量和生物利用度,并评估潜在的下游后遗症。