Falk Dean, Zollikofer Christoph P E, Ponce de León Marcia, Semendeferi Katerina, Alatorre Warren José Luis, Hopkins William D
Department of Anthropology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
School for Advanced Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
Brain Behav Evol. 2018;91(1):45-58. doi: 10.1159/000487248. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
The only direct source of information about hominin brain evolution comes from the fossil record of endocranial casts (endocasts) that reproduce details of the external morphology of the brain imprinted on the walls of the braincase during life. Surface traces of sulci that separate the brain's convolutions (gyri) are reproduced sporadically on early hominin endocasts. Paleoneurologists rely heavily on published descriptions of sulci on brains of great apes, especially chimpanzees (humans' phylogenetically closest living relatives), to guide their identifications of sulci on ape-sized hominin endocasts. However, the few comprehensive descriptions of cortical sulci published for chimpanzees usually relied on post mortem brains, (now) antiquated terminology for some sulci, and photographs or line drawings from limited perspectives (typically right or left lateral views). The shortage of adequate descriptions of chimpanzee sulcal patterns partly explains why the identities of certain sulci on australopithecine endocasts (e.g., the inferior frontal and middle frontal sulci) have been controversial. Here, we provide images of lateral and dorsal surfaces of 16 hemispheres from 4 male and 4 female adult chimpanzee brains that were obtained using in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Sulci on the exposed surfaces of the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes are identified on the images based on their locations, positions relative to each other, and homologies known from comparative studies of cytoarchitecture in primates. These images and sulcal identifications exceed the quantity and quality of previously published illustrations of chimpanzee brains with comprehensively labeled sulci and, thus, provide a larger number of examples for identifying sulci on hominin endocasts than hitherto available. Our findings, even in a small sample like the present one, overturn published claims that australopithecine endocasts reproduce derived configurations of certain sulci in their frontal lobes that never appear on chimpanzee brains. The sulcal patterns in these new images also suggest that changes in two gyri that bridge between the parietal and occipital lobes may have contributed to cortical reorganization in early hominins. It is our hope that these labeled in vivo chimpanzee brains will assist future researchers in identifying sulci on hominin endocasts, which is a necessary first step in the quest to learn how and when the external morphology of the human cerebral cortex evolved from apelike precursors.
关于古人类大脑进化的唯一直接信息来源是颅内模(脑模)的化石记录,这些颅内模再现了大脑在生命过程中印刻在脑壳壁上的外部形态细节。分隔大脑脑回的脑沟表面痕迹在早期古人类颅内模上偶尔会被再现。古神经学家在很大程度上依赖于对大猩猩,尤其是黑猩猩(人类在系统发育上现存的最近亲属)大脑脑沟的已发表描述,来指导他们对猿类大小的古人类颅内模上脑沟的识别。然而,为黑猩猩发表的少数关于皮质脑沟的全面描述通常依赖于死后的大脑、(现在)一些脑沟过时的术语以及从有限视角(通常是右侧或左侧视图)拍摄的照片或线条图。对黑猩猩脑沟模式缺乏充分描述,部分解释了为什么南方古猿颅内模上某些脑沟(如下额和中额脑沟)的身份一直存在争议。在这里,我们提供了来自4只成年雄性和4只成年雌性黑猩猩大脑的16个半球的外侧和背侧表面的图像,这些图像是通过活体磁共振成像获得的。根据额叶、顶叶、颞叶和枕叶暴露表面上脑沟的位置、它们彼此之间的相对位置以及从灵长类动物细胞结构比较研究中已知的同源性,在图像上识别这些脑沟。这些图像和脑沟识别在数量和质量上都超过了以前发表的带有全面标记脑沟的黑猩猩大脑插图,因此,为识别古人类颅内模上的脑沟提供了比以往更多的示例。我们的发现,即使是像目前这样的小样本,也推翻了已发表的说法,即南方古猿颅内模在其额叶中再现了某些在黑猩猩大脑上从未出现过的脑沟的衍生构型。这些新图像中的脑沟模式还表明,连接顶叶和枕叶的两个脑回的变化可能对早期古人类的皮质重组有贡献。我们希望这些带有标记的活体黑猩猩大脑将帮助未来的研究人员识别古人类颅内模上的脑沟,这是探索人类大脑皮层外部形态如何以及何时从类猿祖先进化而来的必要第一步。