• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在荷兰儿童中,Ara h 2真的是花生过敏的最佳预测指标吗?

Is Ara h 2 indeed the best predictor for peanut allergy in Dutch children?

作者信息

Schots Mirjam, de Mol Amerik C, Vermeer Henricus J, Roosen Yvonne M, Vriesman Aldonse W

机构信息

1Department of Pediatrics, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

2Department of Clinical Chemistry, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Diagnosis (Berl). 2016 Mar 1;3(1):31-35. doi: 10.1515/dx-2015-0032.

DOI:10.1515/dx-2015-0032
PMID:29536883
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Specific immunoglobulin E to Ara h 2 (sIgE to Ara h 2) is described as an upcoming predicting factor for diagnosing peanut allergy in children. The gold standard for diagnosing peanut allergy is a double blind placebo controlled food challenge, however this is time consuming and potentially harmful. We investigate Ara h 2 as a preliminary less invasive diagnostic tool for diagnosing peanut allergy in a general population of peanut sensitized children.

METHODS

Children (n=52) with peanut sensitization were retrospectively included. An oral food challenge (OFC) confirmed peanut allergy or tolerance, as primary outcome. Individual candidate predictors were identified by univariate regression analysis and used in a prediction model. Different cut-off values were obtained and receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses resulted in Ara h 2 as best predictor, with a discriminative ability of 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.97). Sensitivity and specificity of 55% and 95%, respectively, were found for a sIgE to Ara h 2 cut-off value of 4.25 kU/L. The highest positive predictive value of 100% was reached at 5.61 kU/L. No absolute relation was found between the value of Ara h 2 and the severity of the reaction during OFC.

CONCLUSION

This study developed a prediction model in which sIgE to Ara h 2 was the best predictor for peanut allergy in sensitized children in a general hospital. Therefore depending on the history and the Ara h 2 results, an OFC is not always needed to confirm the diagnosis.

摘要

背景

抗花生2号蛋白特异性免疫球蛋白E(sIgE to Ara h 2)被认为是诊断儿童花生过敏的一个新兴预测因子。诊断花生过敏的金标准是双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验,但该试验耗时且有潜在危害。我们研究将Ara h 2作为一种初步的、侵入性较小的诊断工具,用于在花生致敏儿童的普通人群中诊断花生过敏。

方法

回顾性纳入52名花生致敏儿童。以口服食物激发试验(OFC)确认花生过敏或耐受作为主要结果。通过单变量回归分析确定个体候选预测因子,并将其用于预测模型。获得不同的临界值并绘制受试者工作特征曲线。

结果

多变量分析结果显示Ara h 2是最佳预测因子,判别能力为0.87(95%置信区间,0.77 - 0.97)。当sIgE to Ara h 2临界值为4.25 kU/L时,敏感性和特异性分别为55%和95%。在5.61 kU/L时达到最高阳性预测值100%。未发现Ara h 2的值与OFC期间反应的严重程度之间存在绝对关系。

结论

本研究建立了一个预测模型,其中sIgE to Ara h 2是综合医院中致敏儿童花生过敏的最佳预测因子。因此,根据病史和Ara h 2结果,并非总是需要进行OFC来确诊。

相似文献

1
Is Ara h 2 indeed the best predictor for peanut allergy in Dutch children?在荷兰儿童中,Ara h 2真的是花生过敏的最佳预测指标吗?
Diagnosis (Berl). 2016 Mar 1;3(1):31-35. doi: 10.1515/dx-2015-0032.
2
Diagnostic Value of Antigen-Specific Immunoglobulin E Immunoassays against Ara h 2 and Ara h 8 Peanut Components in Child Food Allergy.抗原特异性免疫球蛋白E免疫测定法对儿童食物过敏中花生成分Ara h 2和Ara h 8的诊断价值
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2016;169(4):216-22. doi: 10.1159/000446181. Epub 2016 May 26.
3
Diagnostic Value of Specific IgE to Peanut and Ara h 2 in Korean Children with Peanut Allergy.特异性IgE对韩国花生过敏儿童花生及Ara h 2的诊断价值
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2016 Mar;8(2):156-60. doi: 10.4168/aair.2016.8.2.156. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
4
Ara h 2 is the best predictor for peanut allergy in adults.Ara h 2 是成人花生过敏的最佳预测因子。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013 Nov-Dec;1(6):632-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.07.014. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
5
Increasing the accuracy of peanut allergy diagnosis by using Ara h 2.通过使用 Ara h 2 提高花生过敏诊断的准确性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Apr;129(4):1056-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.01.056. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
6
Peanut components measured by ISAC: comparison with ImmunoCap and clinical relevance in peanut allergic children.通过ISAC检测的花生成分:与免疫捕获法的比较及在花生过敏儿童中的临床相关性
Clin Mol Allergy. 2021 Aug 9;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12948-021-00153-w.
7
Skin prick testing a better predictor than blood testing for the diagnosis of peanut allergy in Chinese children.对于中国儿童花生过敏的诊断,皮肤点刺试验比血液检测更具预测性。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2021 Dec;39(4):241-248. doi: 10.12932/AP-110319-0519.
8
The diagnostic value of specific IgE to Ara h 2 to predict peanut allergy in children is comparable to a validated and updated diagnostic prediction model.特异性 IgE 对 Ara h 2 的诊断价值可预测儿童花生过敏,与经验证和更新的诊断预测模型相当。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Jan;131(1):157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.010. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
9
Ara h 2 and Ara 6 are the best predictors of severe peanut allergy: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.Ara h 2 和 Ara 6 是严重花生过敏的最佳预测因子:一项双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Allergy. 2015 Oct;70(10):1239-45. doi: 10.1111/all.12671. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
10
Which test is best for diagnosing peanut allergy in South African children with atopic dermatitis?对于患有特应性皮炎的南非儿童,哪种检测最适合诊断花生过敏?
S Afr Med J. 2016 Jan 6;106(2):214-20. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i2.10125.

引用本文的文献

1
Peanut components measured by ISAC: comparison with ImmunoCap and clinical relevance in peanut allergic children.通过ISAC检测的花生成分:与免疫捕获法的比较及在花生过敏儿童中的临床相关性
Clin Mol Allergy. 2021 Aug 9;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12948-021-00153-w.