Pathria M, Somers S, Gill G
Can Assoc Radiol J. 1987 Mar;38(1):32-4.
We performed a randomized, double-blind prospective study comparing pain experienced during peripheral and aortic angiography with two different contrast agents. Sixty patients, receiving a total of 107 injections, were randomized to receive either ioxaglate (Hexabrix) or sodium-meglumine diatrizoate (Renografin-76). Subjects scored the pain they experienced on a 10-point visual analog scale, and the physician also scored their discomfort on a five point scale. Hemodynamic parameters were monitored during the procedure in all patients, and subsequent hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis were performed in 19 of the 60 patients. There was a significant reduction in the degree of pain experienced by the Ioxaglate group compared to the reference group (p less than 0.001). The patients in the Hexabrix group had a mean pain score of 1.3 compared to the patients in the Renografin-76 group who had a mean pain score of 6.1. The two groups did not differ in their hemodynamic responses to the contrast agents, and no significant differences were noted in the subsequent laboratory measures.
我们进行了一项随机、双盲前瞻性研究,比较两种不同造影剂在周围血管造影和主动脉造影过程中引起的疼痛。60名患者共接受了107次注射,随机分为接受碘克沙醇(Hexabrix)组或葡甲胺泛影酸钠(Renografin - 76)组。受试者使用10分视觉模拟量表对所经历的疼痛进行评分,医生也使用5分量表对其不适程度进行评分。所有患者在操作过程中监测血流动力学参数,60名患者中的19名随后进行了血液学、血清化学和尿液分析。与参照组相比,碘克沙醇组所经历的疼痛程度显著降低(p < 0.001)。Hexabrix组患者的平均疼痛评分为1.3,而Renografin - 76组患者的平均疼痛评分为6.1。两组对造影剂的血流动力学反应无差异,后续实验室检查也未发现显著差异。