Private Practice for Oral Surgery, Lindau/Lake Constance, Germany.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Mar;29(3):320-327. doi: 10.1111/clr.13119.
As the 2-year results for immediately inserted and provisionalized implants have been reported, it remained an open issue, whether the initially high success rates and the esthetic outcome remain stable for longer observation periods. Therefore, this prospective study examines the 5-year hard and soft tissue changes at implants placed in the anterior maxilla.
Meanwhile, 37 microthreaded implants were placed in 21 patients into extraction sockets with and without facial bone deficiencies by a flapless approach. Facial gaps and bony defects were grafted with autogenous bone chips. The implants were immediately provisionalized. The primary outcome parameters were the interproximal marginal bone level and the thickness of the facial bony wall. Implant success and Pink Esthetic Score (PES) were considered as secondary outcome parameters.
Two patients with four implants withdrew from the study (dropouts), and the remaining 33 implants were still in function at a follow-up period of 68 months. Marginal bone height averaged 0.04 mm coronal to the implant shoulder. The thickness of the facial bony lamellae increased significantly between pre-op examination and 1-year follow-up (p = .002) and thereafter remained stable. Within 5 years of follow-up, 24 of 33 implants were clinically stable, free of signs and symptoms, and showed bone loss less than 1 mm. The mean PES ratings improved slightly from 10.7 pre-operatively to 11.7 at the last follow-up (p = .02).
Interproximal marginal bone levels, survival rates, and esthetic results remain stable at the 5-year follow-up in implants used in an immediate insertion, reconstruction, and provisionalization concept. Facial marginal bone levels decreased slightly; however, this reduction did not affect the PES so far.
由于已经报道了即刻植入和临时修复的 2 年结果,因此仍然存在一个未解决的问题,即最初的高成功率和美学效果是否在更长的观察期内保持稳定。因此,本前瞻性研究检查了在前上颌植入物中放置的 5 年软硬组织变化。
同时,通过无瓣技术,将 37 个微螺纹种植体植入 21 名患者的拔牙窝中,其中一些存在颊侧骨缺损。使用自体骨屑移植来填充颊侧间隙和骨缺损。种植体被即刻临时修复。主要的结果参数是邻间边缘骨水平和颊侧骨壁的厚度。种植体的成功率和 Pink 美学评分(PES)被认为是次要的结果参数。
两名患者的四颗种植体退出了研究(脱落),其余 33 颗种植体在 68 个月的随访期内仍在使用。种植体肩上方的边缘骨高度平均为 0.04mm。颊侧骨板的厚度在术前检查和 1 年随访时显著增加(p=0.002),此后保持稳定。在 5 年的随访期内,33 颗种植体中有 24 颗临床稳定,无任何症状和体征,骨损失小于 1mm。PES 评分从术前的 10.7 分略微提高到最后一次随访时的 11.7 分(p=0.02)。
在即刻植入、重建和临时修复的概念中,种植体的邻间边缘骨水平、存活率和美学效果在 5 年的随访中保持稳定。颊侧边缘骨水平略有下降;然而,到目前为止,这种减少并未影响 PES。