• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险调整后的支付方式会影响初级保健提供者关于在何处开业的决策吗?

Does risk-adjusted payment influence primary care providers' decision on where to set up practices?

作者信息

Anell Anders, Dackehag Margareta, Dietrichson Jens

机构信息

Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Box 7080, SE-22007, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Box 7082, SE-22007, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 14;18(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2983-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-018-2983-3
PMID:29540153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5853067/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Providing equal access to health care is an important objective in most health care systems. It is especially pertinent in systems like the Swedish primary care market, where private providers are free to establish themselves in any part of the country. To improve equity in access to care, 15 out 21 county councils in Sweden have implemented risk-adjusted capitation based on the Care Need Index, which increases capitation to primary care centers with a large share of patients with unfavorable socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. Our aim is to estimate the effects of using care-need adjusted capitation on the supply of private primary care centers.

METHOD

We use a dataset that combines information on all primary care centers in Sweden during 2005-2013, the payment system and other conditions for establishing new primary care centers used in the county councils, and demographic, geographic, and socioeconomic variables for low-level geographic areas. To estimate the effects of care-need adjusted capitation, we use difference-in-differences models, contrasting the development over time between areas with and without risk-adjusted capitation, and with high and low Care Need Index values.

RESULTS

Risk-adjusted capitation significantly increases the number of private primary care centers in areas with relatively high Care Need Index values. The adjustment results in a changed distribution of private centers within county councils; the total number of private centers does not increase in county councils using care-need adjusted capitation. The effects are furthermore increasing over the first three years after the implementation of such capitation, and concentrated to the lower and middle range of the group of areas with high index values.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk-adjusted capitation based on the Care Need Index increases the supply of private primary care centers in areas with unfavorable socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. More generally, this result indicates that risk-adjusted capitation can significantly affect private providers' establishment decisions.

摘要

背景

在大多数医疗保健系统中,提供平等的医疗保健服务是一个重要目标。这在瑞典初级保健市场这样的系统中尤为相关,在该市场中,私人医疗服务提供者可以在该国任何地区自由设立机构。为了提高医疗服务获取的公平性,瑞典21个郡议会中有15个已根据护理需求指数实施了风险调整后的人头费制度,该制度会增加对那些有很大比例社会经济和人口特征不利患者的初级保健中心的人头费。我们的目的是评估使用护理需求调整后的人头费对私人初级保健中心供应的影响。

方法

我们使用了一个数据集,该数据集结合了2005年至2013年期间瑞典所有初级保健中心的信息、支付系统以及郡议会用于设立新初级保健中心的其他条件,以及低级别地理区域的人口、地理和社会经济变量。为了评估护理需求调整后的人头费的影响,我们使用了差分模型,对比有和没有风险调整后的人头费地区以及护理需求指数值高和低的地区随时间的发展情况。

结果

风险调整后的人头费显著增加了护理需求指数值相对较高地区的私人初级保健中心数量。这种调整导致了郡议会内私人中心分布的变化;在使用护理需求调整后的人头费的郡议会中,私人中心的总数并未增加。此外,在实施这种人头费制度后的头三年里,影响不断增加,并且集中在指数值高的地区组的中低范围。

结论

基于护理需求指数的风险调整后的人头费增加了社会经济和人口特征不利地区的私人初级保健中心供应。更一般地说,这一结果表明风险调整后的人头费会显著影响私人医疗服务提供者的设立决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9511/5853067/5f6b211bf255/12913_2018_2983_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9511/5853067/dee9dfeba4c3/12913_2018_2983_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9511/5853067/d116c555346b/12913_2018_2983_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9511/5853067/5f6b211bf255/12913_2018_2983_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9511/5853067/dee9dfeba4c3/12913_2018_2983_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9511/5853067/d116c555346b/12913_2018_2983_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9511/5853067/5f6b211bf255/12913_2018_2983_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Does risk-adjusted payment influence primary care providers' decision on where to set up practices?风险调整后的支付方式会影响初级保健提供者关于在何处开业的决策吗?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 14;18(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2983-3.
2
Factors that influence the willingness of private primary care pediatricians to accept more Medicaid patients.影响私立基层医疗儿科医生接纳更多医疗补助计划患者意愿的因素。
Pediatrics. 2002 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):239-48. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.2.239.
3
The effects of payment method on clinical decision-making: physician responses to clinical scenarios.支付方式对临床决策的影响:医生对临床情景的反应
Med Care. 2004 Mar;42(3):297-302. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000114918.50088.1c.
4
Risk adjustment and primary health care in Chile.智利的风险调整与初级卫生保健。
Croat Med J. 2006 Jun;47(3):459-68.
5
Risk adjustment for high utilizers of public mental health care.公共精神卫生保健高利用率人群的风险调整
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2000 Sep 1;3(3):129-137. doi: 10.1002/mhp.85.
6
Evaluation of the equity of age-sex adjusted primary care capitation payments in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省按年龄性别调整的初级保健人头付费的公平性评估。
Health Policy. 2012 Feb;104(2):186-92. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
7
Putting Providers At-Risk through Capitation or Shared Savings: How Strong are Incentives for Upcoding and Treatment Changes?通过按人头付费或共享节约让医疗服务提供者承担风险:编码升级和治疗改变的激励措施有多强?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2020 Sep 1;23(3):81-91.
8
Does capitation affect the delivery of oral healthcare and access to services? Evidence from a pilot contact in Northern Ireland.按人头付费是否会影响口腔医疗保健的提供及服务获取?来自北爱尔兰一项试点项目的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 6;17(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2117-3.
9
Do physician-payment mechanisms affect hospital utilization? A study of Health Service Organizations in Ontario.医生薪酬机制会影响医院的利用率吗?安大略省医疗服务组织的一项研究。
CMAJ. 1996 Mar 1;154(5):653-61.
10
Health care purchasing in Kenya: Experiences of health care providers with capitation and fee-for-service provider payment mechanisms.肯尼亚的医疗保健采购:医疗服务提供者在按人头付费和按服务收费支付机制方面的经验。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Jan;34(1):e917-e933. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2707. Epub 2018 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Adjustment in Capitation Payments to Primary Care Providers: Does It Matter How We Account for Patients' Socioeconomic Status?向初级保健提供者支付人头费中的风险调整:我们对患者社会经济地位的考量方式重要吗?
Med Care. 2025 Jun 1;63(6):430-435. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002141. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
2
Do Physicians Respond to Additional Capitation Payments in Mixed Remuneration Schemes?在混合薪酬计划中,医生会对额外的人头费支付做出反应吗?
Health Econ. 2025 Jun;34(6):1143-1159. doi: 10.1002/hec.4954. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
3
Health Reform in Aotearoa New Zealand: Insights on Health Equity Challenges One Year On.

本文引用的文献

1
Rethinking the Primary Care Workforce - An Expanded Role for Nurses.重新思考基层医疗劳动力——护士角色的拓展
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 15;375(11):1015-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1606869.
2
Free establishment of primary health care providers: effects on geographical equity.初级医疗服务提供者的自由设立:对地理公平性的影响
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 23;16:28. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1259-z.
3
Interventions for increasing the proportion of health professionals practising in rural and other underserved areas.增加在农村及其他服务欠缺地区执业的卫生专业人员比例的干预措施。
新西兰奥塔哥的医疗改革:一年后对健康公平挑战的见解。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Sep;21(5):683-687. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00823-7. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
4
New reimbursement model in Icelandic primary care in 2017: first-year comparison of public and private primary care.2017 年冰岛初级保健的新报销模式:公共初级保健与私人初级保健的第一年比较。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Jun;40(2):313-319. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2097713. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
Fifteen years with patient choice and free establishment in Swedish primary healthcare: what do we know?十五年的瑞典基础医疗保健中的患者选择和自由设立:我们了解多少?
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Nov;50(7):852-863. doi: 10.1177/14034948221095365. Epub 2022 May 20.
6
Conditions and barriers for quality improvement work: a qualitative study of how professionals and health centre managers experience audit and feedback practices in Swedish primary care.质量改进工作的条件和障碍:对专业人员和卫生中心管理人员在瑞典初级保健中体验审核和反馈实践的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jun 14;22(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01462-4.
7
Weak association between socioeconomic Care Need Index and primary care visits per registered patient in three Swedish regions.瑞典三个地区社会经济护理需求指数与每位注册患者的初级保健就诊次数之间的弱关联。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021 Sep;39(3):288-295. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1928836. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 30;2015(6):CD005314. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005314.pub3.
4
The public-private pendulum--patient choice and equity in Sweden.公私之间的摇摆——瑞典的患者选择与公平性
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):1-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1411430.
5
Social inequalities in self-reported refraining from health care due to financial reasons in Sweden: health care on equal terms?瑞典因经济原因自我报告未寻求医疗保健的社会不平等现象:平等获得医疗保健服务?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 29;14:605. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0605-2.
6
The small area predictors of ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations: a comparison of changes over time.门诊医疗敏感住院的小面积预测因素:随时间变化的比较。
Soc Work Public Health. 2014;29(2):176-88. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2013.776316.
7
Delivery of primary health care to persons who are socio-economically disadvantaged: does the organizational delivery model matter?为社会经济弱势群体提供初级卫生保健:组织提供模式是否重要?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec 17;13:517. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-517.
8
Income-related inequalities and inequities in health care services utilisation in 18 selected OECD countries.18 个选定的经合组织国家医疗服务利用的与收入相关的不平等和不公平。
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Jan;16(1):21-33. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0546-4. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
9
Changes in health care utilisation following a reform involving choice and privatisation in Swedish primary care: a five-year follow-up of GP-visits.改革后医疗保健利用的变化:瑞典初级保健中的选择和私有化,对 GP 就诊的五年随访。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 31;13:452. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-452.
10
Socioeconomic inequalities in drug utilization for Sweden: evidence from linked survey and register data.瑞典药物利用的社会经济不平等:来自关联调查和登记数据的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jan;77:106-17. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.013. Epub 2012 Nov 22.