Suppr超能文献

在2型糖尿病患者中(年龄组<65岁、≥65岁),Basaglar和来得时的疗效与安全性相似:来自ELEMENT-2研究的事后分析

Similar Efficacy and Safety of Basaglar and Lantus in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Age Groups (< 65 Years, ≥ 65 Years): A Post Hoc Analysis from the ELEMENT-2 Study.

作者信息

Pollom Robyn K, Costigan Timothy, Lacaya Lyndon B, Ilag Liza L, Hollander Priscilla A

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Baylor Endocrine Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2018 Apr;9(2):827-837. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0405-5. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To compare efficacy and safety of Basaglar [insulin glargine 100 units/mL; LY insulin glargine (LY IGlar)] to Lantus [insulin glargine 100 units/mL; SA insulin glargine (SA IGlar)] in older (≥ 65 years) or younger (< 65 years) patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

This subgroup analysis of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multinational, 24-week study compared LY IGlar and SA IGlar on several clinical efficacy (change in glycated hemoglobin (A1c), basal insulin dose, weight) and safety outcomes (incidence of adverse events, insulin antibodies, hypoglycemia incidence and rates) in patients either ≥ 65 or < 65 years.

RESULTS

Compared with patients aged < 65 years (N = 542), patients aged ≥ 65 years (N = 214) had a significantly longer duration of diabetes; lower baseline A1c and body weight; and body mass index; and were more likely to report prestudy SA IGlar use. Compared to patients < 65 years, patients ≥ 65 years needed a lower basal insulin dose and experienced lower body weight gain. There were no significant treatment-by-age interactions for the clinical efficacy and safety outcomes, indicating that there was no differential treatment effect (LY IGlar vs SA IGlar) for patients ≥ 65 years vs those < 65 years. Moreover, within each age subgroup, LY IGlar and SA IGlar were similar for all clinical efficacy and safety outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

LY IGlar and SA IGlar exhibit similar efficacy and safety in patients with T2D who are ≥ 65 years and in those < 65 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration: NCT01421459.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company and Boehringer-Ingelheim.

摘要

简介

比较Basaglar[甘精胰岛素100单位/毫升;礼来甘精胰岛素(LY甘精胰岛素)]与来得时[甘精胰岛素100单位/毫升;赛诺菲甘精胰岛素(SA甘精胰岛素)]在老年(≥65岁)或年轻(<65岁)2型糖尿病(T2D)患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

这项对一项为期24周的3期随机、双盲、多国研究的亚组分析,比较了LY甘精胰岛素和SA甘精胰岛素在≥65岁或<65岁患者中的几种临床疗效(糖化血红蛋白(A1c)变化、基础胰岛素剂量、体重)和安全性指标(不良事件发生率、胰岛素抗体、低血糖发生率和发生率)。

结果

与<65岁的患者(N = 542)相比,≥65岁的患者(N = 214)糖尿病病程明显更长;基线A1c、体重和体重指数更低;且更有可能报告在研究前使用过SA甘精胰岛素。与<65岁的患者相比,≥65岁的患者需要更低的基础胰岛素剂量,体重增加也更少。在临床疗效和安全性指标方面,未发现显著的年龄×治疗交互作用,这表明≥65岁的患者与<65岁的患者相比,不存在差异治疗效果(LY甘精胰岛素与SA甘精胰岛素)。此外,在每个年龄亚组中,LY甘精胰岛素和SA甘精胰岛素在所有临床疗效和安全性指标方面相似。

结论

LY甘精胰岛素和SA甘精胰岛素在≥65岁和<65岁的T2D患者中表现出相似的疗效和安全性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov试验注册编号:NCT01421459。

资助

礼来公司和勃林格殷格翰公司。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9787/6104266/d96d58c5bb2c/13300_2018_405_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验