Suppr超能文献

基于机器学习的腺苷心肌灌注 SPECT 后心脏性死亡预测。

Prediction of cardiac death after adenosine myocardial perfusion SPECT based on machine learning.

机构信息

Medical Imaging Research Center, Illinois Institute of Technology, 3440 S. Dearborn St., Suite 100, Chicago, IL, 60616, USA.

Departments of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Oct;26(5):1746-1754. doi: 10.1007/s12350-018-1250-7. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We developed machine-learning (ML) models to estimate a patient's risk of cardiac death based on adenosine myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) and associated clinical data, and compared their performance to baseline logistic regression (LR). We demonstrated an approach to visually convey the reasoning behind a patient's risk to provide insight to clinicians beyond that of a "black box."

METHODS

We trained multiple models using 122 potential clinical predictors (features) for 8321 patients, including 551 cases of subsequent cardiac death. Accuracy was measured by area under the ROC curve (AUC), computed within a cross-validation framework. We developed a method to display the model's rationale to facilitate clinical interpretation.

RESULTS

The baseline LR (AUC = 0.76; 14 features) was outperformed by all other methods. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) model (AUC = 0.77; p = .045; 6 features) required the fewest features. A support vector machine (SVM) model (AUC = 0.83; p < .0001; 49 features) provided the highest accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

LASSO outperformed LR in both accuracy and simplicity (number of features), with SVM yielding best AUC for prediction of cardiac death in patients undergoing MPS. Combined with presenting the reasoning behind the risk scores, our results suggest that ML can be more effective than LR for this application.

摘要

背景

我们开发了机器学习(ML)模型,基于腺苷心肌灌注 SPECT(MPS)和相关临床数据来估计患者的心脏死亡风险,并将其性能与基线逻辑回归(LR)进行了比较。我们展示了一种方法,可以直观地传达患者风险背后的推理,为临床医生提供超出“黑盒”的见解。

方法

我们使用 122 个潜在的临床预测因子(特征)对 8321 名患者进行了多种模型的训练,包括 551 例随后发生的心脏死亡病例。准确性通过交叉验证框架内的ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)进行衡量。我们开发了一种显示模型原理的方法,以促进临床解释。

结果

基线 LR(AUC=0.76;14 个特征)优于所有其他方法。最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)模型(AUC=0.77;p=0.045;6 个特征)所需的特征最少。支持向量机(SVM)模型(AUC=0.83;p<0.0001;49 个特征)提供了最高的准确性。

结论

LASSO 在准确性和简单性(特征数量)方面均优于 LR,SVM 对 MPS 患者心脏死亡的预测具有最佳 AUC。结合呈现风险评分背后的推理,我们的结果表明,ML 在此应用中比 LR 更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a7/6138585/937a8c2c17bc/nihms944988f1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
Preparing for the Artificial Intelligence Revolution in Nuclear Cardiology.为核心脏病学的人工智能革命做准备。
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Apr;57(2):51-60. doi: 10.1007/s13139-021-00733-3. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine Learning in Medical Imaging.医学成像中的机器学习
IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2010 Jul;27(4):25-38. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2010.936730.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验