Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Foodbank WA, Perth Airport, WA, Australia.
Health Promot J Austr. 2019 Jan;30(1):9-17. doi: 10.1002/hpja.61. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
Currently, two food sufficiency questions are utilised as a proxy measure of national food security status in Australia. These questions do not capture all dimensions of food security and have been attributed to underreporting of the problem. The purpose of this study was to investigate food security using the short form of the US Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) within an Australian context; and explore the relationship between food security status and multiple socio-demographic variables.
Two online surveys were completed by 2334 Australian participants from November 2014 to February 2015. Surveys contained the short form of the HFSSM and twelve socio-demographic questions. Cross-tabulations chi-square tests and a multinomial logistic regression model were employed to analyse the survey data.
Food security status of the respondents was classified accordingly: High or Marginal (64%, n = 1495), Low (20%, n = 460) or Very Low (16%, n = 379). Significant independent predictors of food security were age (P < 0.001), marital status (P = 0.005), household income (P < 0.001) and education (P < 0.001).
Findings suggest food insecurity is an important issue across Australia and that certain groups, regardless of income, are particularly vulnerable. SO WHAT?: Government policy and health promotion interventions that specifically target "at risk" groups may assist to more effectively address the problem. Additionally, the use of a multi-item measure is worth considering as a national indicator of food security in Australia.
目前,澳大利亚使用两个粮食充足问题作为衡量国家粮食安全状况的替代指标。这些问题无法捕捉粮食安全的所有方面,并被归因于报告不足的问题。本研究的目的是在澳大利亚背景下使用美国家庭粮食安全调查模块(HFSSM)的简短形式来调查粮食安全问题;并探讨粮食安全状况与多个社会人口统计学变量之间的关系。
2014 年 11 月至 2015 年 2 月,2334 名澳大利亚参与者完成了两项在线调查。调查包含 HFSSM 的简短形式和 12 个社会人口统计学问题。采用交叉表卡方检验和多项逻辑回归模型分析调查数据。
受访者的粮食安全状况如下分类:高或边缘(64%,n=1495)、低(20%,n=460)或极低(16%,n=379)。粮食安全的独立显著预测因素为年龄(P<0.001)、婚姻状况(P=0.005)、家庭收入(P<0.001)和教育(P<0.001)。
研究结果表明,粮食不安全是澳大利亚的一个重要问题,某些群体,无论收入如何,都特别脆弱。所以呢?政府政策和健康促进干预措施特别针对“高危”群体,可能有助于更有效地解决这一问题。此外,使用多项目措施作为澳大利亚粮食安全的国家指标值得考虑。