Thornton Lukar E, Pearce Jamie R, Ball Kylie
1 Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.
2 Centre for Research on Environment, Society and Health (CRESH), School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Public Health Nutr. 2014 Jan;17(1):20-30. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000347. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
To investigate the associations between sociodemographic factors and both diet indicators and food security among socio-economically disadvantaged populations in two different (national) contextual settings.
Logistic regression was used to determine cross-sectional associations between nationality, marital status, presence of children in the household, education, employment status and household income (four low income categories) with daily fruit and vegetable consumption, low-fat milk consumption and food security.
Socio-economically disadvantaged neighbourhoods in the UK and Australia.
Two samples of low-income women from disadvantaged neighbourhoods: (i) in the UK, the 2003-05 Low Income Diet and Nutrition Survey (LIDNS; n 643); and (ii) in Australia, the 2007-08 Resilience for Eating and Activity Despite Inequality (READI; n 1340).
The influence of nationality, marital status and children in the household on the dietary outcomes varied between the two nations. Obtaining greater education qualifications was the most telling factor associated with healthier dietary behaviours. Being employed was positively associated with low-fat milk consumption in both nations and with fruit consumption in the UK, while income was not associated with dietary behaviours in either nation. In Australia, the likelihood of being food secure was higher among those who were born outside Australia, married, employed or had a greater income, while higher income was the only significant factor in the UK.
The identification of factors that differently influence dietary behaviours and food security in socio-economically disadvantaged populations in the UK and Australia suggests continued efforts need to be made to ensure that interventions and policy responses are informed by the best available local evidence.
调查在两种不同(国家)背景下的社会经济弱势人群中,社会人口学因素与饮食指标及食品安全之间的关联。
采用逻辑回归来确定国籍、婚姻状况、家庭中子女的存在情况、教育程度、就业状况和家庭收入(四个低收入类别)与每日水果和蔬菜消费量、低脂牛奶消费量及食品安全之间的横断面关联。
英国和澳大利亚的社会经济弱势社区。
来自弱势社区的低收入女性的两个样本:(i)在英国,2003 - 2005年低收入饮食与营养调查(LIDNS;n = 643);(ii)在澳大利亚,2007 - 2008年尽管存在不平等但饮食与活动的恢复力(READI;n = 1340)。
两国之间,国籍、婚姻状况和家庭中子女对饮食结果的影响各不相同。获得更高的学历是与更健康饮食行为相关的最显著因素。就业在两国均与低脂牛奶消费呈正相关,在英国与水果消费呈正相关,而在两国中收入均与饮食行为无关。在澳大利亚,出生在澳大利亚境外、已婚、就业或收入较高的人群粮食安全的可能性更高,而在英国,较高收入是唯一的显著因素。
在英国和澳大利亚社会经济弱势人群中,不同因素对饮食行为和食品安全的影响表明,需要持续努力以确保干预措施和政策响应以现有的最佳本地证据为依据。