Suppr超能文献

中文译文: 一项关于脓毒症教育干预对住院时间影响的研究

Effect of a Sepsis Educational Intervention on Hospital Stay.

机构信息

Deparment of Critical Care Medicine and Pediatrics, Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, Universidad de la Sabana, Bogotá, Colombia.

Department of Critical Care Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;19(6):e321-e328. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001536.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate adherence to the sepsis bundle before and after an educational strategy and its impact on hospital stay.

DESIGN

A prospective, analytic, before-and-after study of children with severe sepsis and septic shock who presented to the emergency department.

SETTING

Carried out from January to December 2014 in the emergency department of a quaternary care hospital.

PATIENTS

Of a total of 19,836 children who presented to the emergency department, 4,383 had an infectious pathology, with 203 of these showing severe sepsis and septic shock (124 pre intervention, and 79 post intervention).

INTERVENTIONS

The healthcare providers caring for the patients in pediatric emergency received an educational intervention and an update on the bundle concepts proposed in 2010 by the Pediatric Advanced Life Support program of the American Heart Association and adapted by this study's investigators.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The main cause of sepsis in both groups was respiratory (59 vs 33; p = 0.72), without differences in the Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 score (7.23 vs 8.1; p = 0.23). The postintervention group showed a reduced hospital stay (11.6 vs 7.9 d; p = 0.01), a shorter time before ordering fluid boluses (247 vs 5 min; p = 0.001), the application of the first dose of antibiotic (343 vs 271 min; p = 0.03), and a decreased need for mechanical ventilation (20.1% vs 7.5%; p = 0.01). Postintervention adherence to the complete bundle was 19.2%, compared with the preintervention group, which was 27.7% (p = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to a bundle strategy is low following an educational intervention. However, when patients are managed after instruction in guideline recommendations, hospital stay may be significantly reduced.

摘要

目的

评估在实施教育策略前后对脓毒症包的依从性及其对住院时间的影响。

设计

对因严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克而到急诊就诊的儿童进行前瞻性、分析性、前后对照研究。

地点

在一家四级保健医院的急诊部门进行。

患者

在总共 19836 名到急诊就诊的儿童中,有 4383 名患有传染病,其中 203 名患有严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克(124 名在干预前,79 名在干预后)。

干预措施

照顾儿科急诊患者的医护人员接受了教育干预,并更新了美国心脏协会儿科高级生命支持计划于 2010 年提出的捆绑概念,并由本研究的研究者进行了改编。

测量和主要结果

两组的主要脓毒症病因都是呼吸道(59%比 33%;p = 0.72),儿科死亡率 2 评分无差异(7.23 比 8.1;p = 0.23)。干预后组的住院时间缩短(11.6 比 7.9 天;p = 0.01),补液前时间缩短(247 比 5 分钟;p = 0.001),首次使用抗生素的时间缩短(343 比 271 分钟;p = 0.03),需要机械通气的比例降低(20.1%比 7.5%;p = 0.01)。与干预前组相比,干预后完整包的依从性为 19.2%,而干预前组为 27.7%(p = 0.17)。

结论

在接受教育干预后,捆绑策略的依从性较低。然而,在对遵循指南建议的患者进行管理后,住院时间可能会显著缩短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验