Suppr超能文献

原发性进行性失语症中的语义典型性效应。

Semantic Typicality Effects in Primary Progressive Aphasia.

机构信息

1 Aphasia and Neurolinguistics Research Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.

2 Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2018 Aug;33(5):292-300. doi: 10.1177/1533317518762443. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

Abstract

Prototypical items within a semantic category are processed faster than atypical items within the same category. This typicality effect reflects normal representation and processing of semantic categories and when absent may be reflective of lexical-semantic deficits. We examined typicality effects in individuals with semantic and nonsemantic variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA; semantic-PPA-S, agrammatic-PPA-G), a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by specific decline in language function, and age-matched controls. Using a semantic category verification task, where participants were asked to decide whether visual or auditory words (category typical, atypical, or nonmembers) belonged within a specified superordinate category, we found a typicality effect (ie, faster response times for typical vs atypical items) for all participant groups. However, participants with more severe PPA-S did not show a typicality effect in either modality. Findings may reflect increased intracategory semantic blurring as the disease progresses and semantic impairment becomes more severe.

摘要

在同一类别中,原型项目的处理速度比非原型项目快。这种典型性效应反映了语义范畴的正常表示和处理,而当不存在时,可能反映了词汇语义缺陷。我们在语义和非语义原发性进行性失语症(PPA;语义-PPA-S,语法性 PPA-G)患者个体中检查了典型性效应,这是一种以语言功能特异性下降为特征的神经退行性疾病,以及年龄匹配的对照组。使用语义类别验证任务,要求参与者判断视觉或听觉单词(类别典型、非典型或非成员)是否属于特定的上位类别,我们发现所有参与者群体都存在典型性效应(即,典型项目的反应时间比非典型项目快)。然而,语义-PPA-S 更严重的患者在任何一种模态中都没有表现出典型性效应。研究结果可能反映出随着疾病的进展,类别内语义模糊度增加,语义损伤变得更加严重。

相似文献

1
Semantic Typicality Effects in Primary Progressive Aphasia.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2018 Aug;33(5):292-300. doi: 10.1177/1533317518762443. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
2
Does surface dyslexia/dysgraphia relate to semantic deficits in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia?
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Dec;135:107241. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107241. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
3
Typicality mediates performance during category verification in both ad-hoc and well-defined categories.
J Commun Disord. 2012 Mar-Apr;45(2):69-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.12.004. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
4
Representation of semantic typicality in brain activation in healthy adults and individuals with aphasia: A multi-voxel pattern analysis.
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Jul 30;158:107893. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107893. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Understanding semantic and phonological processing deficits in adults with aphasia: Effects of category and typicality.
Aphasiology. 2016;30(6):719-749. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1081137. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
6
Improved verbal learning in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia when using semantic cues.
Neurocase. 2015;21(3):345-50. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2014.894081. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
7
The Brain Network of Naming: A Lesson from Primary Progressive Aphasia.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0148707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148707. eCollection 2016.
8
Typicality in the brain during semantic and episodic memory decisions.
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Jun 6;184:108529. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108529. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
9
Effect of typicality on online category verification of animate category exemplars in aphasia.
Brain Lang. 2003 Jun;85(3):441-50. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00064-6.

引用本文的文献

2
The Semantic Association Test (SAT): normative data from healthy Italian participants and a validation study in aphasic patients.
Neurol Sci. 2023 May;44(5):1575-1586. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06543-5. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
4
Online sentence processing impairments in agrammatic and logopenic primary progressive aphasia: Evidence from ERP.
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Jan 22;151:107728. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107728. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

本文引用的文献

2
Words and objects at the tip of the left temporal lobe in primary progressive aphasia.
Brain. 2013 Feb;136(Pt 2):601-18. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws336. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
3
Quantitative classification of primary progressive aphasia at early and mild impairment stages.
Brain. 2012 May;135(Pt 5):1537-53. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws080. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
4
Semantic interference during object naming in agrammatic and logopenic primary progressive aphasia (PPA).
Brain Lang. 2012 Mar;120(3):237-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
5
Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants.
Neurology. 2011 Mar 15;76(11):1006-14. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
6
Semantic Typicality Effects in Acquired Dyslexia: Evidence for Semantic Impairment in Deep Dyslexia.
Aphasiology. 2010 Jun 1;24(6-8):802-813. doi: 10.1080/02687030903422486.
7
Quantitative template for subtyping primary progressive aphasia.
Arch Neurol. 2009 Dec;66(12):1545-51. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.288.
8
Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.
9
The northwestern anagram test: measuring sentence production in primary progressive aphasia.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2009 Oct-Nov;24(5):408-16. doi: 10.1177/1533317509343104. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
10
Neurology of anomia in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia.
Brain. 2009 Sep;132(Pt 9):2553-65. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp138. Epub 2009 Jun 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验