• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种使用小内源性分子测试化学品皮肤致敏潜力的简单化学方法。

A simple in chemico method for testing skin sensitizing potential of chemicals using small endogenous molecules.

作者信息

Nepal Mahesh Raj, Shakya Rajina, Kang Mi Jeong, Jeong Tae Cheon

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, South Korea.

College of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, South Korea.

出版信息

Toxicol Lett. 2018 Jun 1;289:75-85. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.03.006
PMID:29545173
Abstract

Among many of the validated methods for testing skin sensitization, direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) employs no cells or animals. Although no immune cells are involved in this assay, it reliably predicts the skin sensitization potential of a chemical in chemico. Herein, a new method was developed using endogenous small-molecular-weight compounds, cysteamine and glutathione, rather than synthetic peptides, to differentiate skin sensitizers from non-sensitizers with an accuracy as high as DPRA. The percent depletion of cysteamine and glutathione by test chemicals was measured by an HPLC equipped with a PDA detector. To detect small-size molecules, such as cysteamine and glutathione, a derivatization by 4-(4-dimethylaminophenylazo) benzenesulfonyl chloride (DABS-Cl) was employed prior to the HPLC analysis. Following test method optimization, a cut-off criterion of 7.14% depletion was applied to differentiate skin sensitizers from non-sensitizers in combination of the ratio of 1:25 for cysteamine:test chemical with 1:50 for glutathione:test chemical for the best predictivity among various single or combination conditions. Although overlapping HPLC peaks could not be fully resolved for some test chemicals, high levels of sensitivity (100.0%), specificity (81.8%), and accuracy (93.3%) were obtained for 30 chemicals tested, which were comparable or better than those achieved with DPRA.

摘要

在众多经过验证的皮肤致敏性测试方法中,直接肽反应性测定法(DPRA)不使用细胞或动物。尽管该测定法不涉及免疫细胞,但它能可靠地预测化学物质在体外的皮肤致敏潜力。在此,开发了一种新方法,使用内源性小分子化合物半胱胺和谷胱甘肽而非合成肽来区分皮肤致敏剂和非致敏剂,其准确性与DPRA相当。通过配备光电二极管阵列(PDA)检测器的高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定测试化学品对半胱胺和谷胱甘肽的消耗百分比。为了检测半胱胺和谷胱甘肽等小分子,在HPLC分析之前采用4-(4-二甲基氨基苯基偶氮)苯磺酰氯(DABS-Cl)进行衍生化。经过测试方法优化后,应用7.14%的消耗截断标准,结合半胱胺与测试化学品1:25以及谷胱甘肽与测试化学品1:50的比例,以在各种单一或组合条件下获得最佳预测性,从而区分皮肤致敏剂和非致敏剂。尽管某些测试化学品的重叠HPLC峰无法完全分离,但对于所测试的30种化学品,获得了高水平的灵敏度(100.0%)、特异性(81.8%)和准确性(93.3%),这些结果与DPRA相当或更好。

相似文献

1
A simple in chemico method for testing skin sensitizing potential of chemicals using small endogenous molecules.一种使用小内源性分子测试化学品皮肤致敏潜力的简单化学方法。
Toxicol Lett. 2018 Jun 1;289:75-85. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
2
A highly sensitive and selective high pressure liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS-MS) method for the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA).一种用于直接肽反应性测定(DPRA)的高灵敏度和高选择性的高效液相色谱-串联质谱(HPLC/MS-MS)方法。
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2018 Nov-Dec;94(Pt 2):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
3
In chemico assessment of potential sensitizers: Stability and direct peptide reactivity of 24 fragrance ingredients.化学评估潜在敏化剂:24 种香料成分的稳定性和直接肽反应性。
J Appl Toxicol. 2019 Feb;39(2):398-408. doi: 10.1002/jat.3732. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
The underlying factors that explain why nucleophilic reagents rarely co-elute with test chemicals in the ADRA.解释亲核试剂在自动动态范围分析(ADRA)中很少与测试化学品共洗脱的潜在因素。
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2019 Mar-Apr;96:95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
5
A novel in chemico method to detect skin sensitizers in highly diluted reaction conditions.一种在高稀释反应条件下检测皮肤致敏剂的新型化学方法。
J Appl Toxicol. 2015 Nov;35(11):1348-60. doi: 10.1002/jat.3139. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
6
A convenient spectrophotometric test for screening skin-sensitizing chemicals using reactivity with glutathione .一种利用与谷胱甘肽的反应性来筛选皮肤致敏化学物质的便捷分光光度测试法。
Toxicol Res. 2023 Dec 13;40(2):203-213. doi: 10.1007/s43188-023-00218-9. eCollection 2024 Apr.
7
A convenient fluorometric test method for skin sensitization using glutathione .利用谷胱甘肽的简便荧光检测法进行皮肤致敏试验。
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2021 Oct 2;84(19):783-799. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2021.1944939. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
8
A fluorescence high throughput screening method for the detection of reactive electrophiles as potential skin sensitizers.一种用于检测作为潜在皮肤致敏剂的活性亲电试剂的荧光高通量筛选方法。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2015 Dec 1;289(2):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2015.09.027. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
9
LC-MS-based characterization of the peptide reactivity of chemicals to improve the in vitro prediction of the skin sensitization potential.基于液相色谱-质谱联用技术对化学物质肽反应性的表征,以改善皮肤致敏潜力的体外预测。
Toxicol Sci. 2008 Dec;106(2):464-78. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn194. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
10
High-throughput screening (HTS)-based spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) to predict human skin sensitization potential.基于高通量筛选(HTS)的分光光度直接肽反应性测定法(Spectro-DPRA)预测人体皮肤致敏潜能。
Toxicol Lett. 2019 Oct 10;314:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimation of the Skin Sensitization Potential of Chemicals of the Acyl Domain Using DFT-Based Calculations.基于密度泛函理论计算估算酰基域化学品的皮肤致敏潜能。
Chem Res Toxicol. 2024 Nov 18;37(11):1876-1883. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00244. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
2
A convenient spectrophotometric test for screening skin-sensitizing chemicals using reactivity with glutathione .一种利用与谷胱甘肽的反应性来筛选皮肤致敏化学物质的便捷分光光度测试法。
Toxicol Res. 2023 Dec 13;40(2):203-213. doi: 10.1007/s43188-023-00218-9. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Alternative Methods for Skin-Sensitization Assessment.
皮肤致敏性评估的替代方法。
Toxics. 2022 Nov 29;10(12):740. doi: 10.3390/toxics10120740.