Department of Respiratory Therapy, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;19(6):507-512. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001522.
To promote standardization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention introduced a new ventilator-associated pneumonia classification, which was modified for pediatrics (pediatric ventilator-associated pneumonia according to proposed criteria [PVAP]). We evaluated the frequency of PVAP in a cohort of children diagnosed with ventilator-associated pneumonia according to traditional criteria and compared their strength of association with clinically relevant outcomes.
Retrospective cohort study.
Tertiary care pediatric hospital.
Critically ill children (0-18 yr) diagnosed with ventilator-associated pneumonia between January 2006 and December 2015 were identified from an infection control database. Patients were excluded if on high frequency ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or reintubated 24 hours following extubation.
None.
Patients were assessed for PVAP diagnosis. Primary outcome was the proportion of subjects diagnosed with PVAP. Secondary outcomes included association with intervals of care. Two hundred seventy-seven children who had been diagnosed with ventilator-associated pneumonia were eligible for review; 46 were excluded for being ventilated under 48 hours (n = 16), on high frequency ventilation (n = 12), on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 8), ineligible bacteria isolated from culture (n = 8), and other causes (n = 4). ICU admission diagnoses included congenital heart disease (47%), neurological (16%), trauma (7%), respiratory (7%), posttransplant (4%), neuromuscular (3%), and cardiomyopathy (3%). Only 16% of subjects (n = 45) met the new PVAP definition, with 18% (n = 49) having any ventilator-associated condition. Failure to fulfill new definitions was based on inadequate increase in mean airway pressure in 90% or FIO2 in 92%. PVAP was associated with prolonged ventilation (median [interquartile range], 29 d [13-51 d] vs 16 d [8-34.5 d]; p = 0.002), ICU (median [interquartile range], 40 d [20-100 d] vs 25 d [14-61 d]; p = 0.004) and hospital length of stay (median [interquartile range], 81 d [40-182 d] vs 54 d [31-108 d]; p = 0.04), and death (33% vs 16%; p = 0.008).
Few children with ventilator-associated pneumonia diagnosis met the proposed PVAP criteria. PVAP was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This work suggests that additional study is required before new definitions for ventilator-associated pneumonia are introduced for children.
为了促进规范化,疾病预防控制中心引入了一种新的呼吸机相关性肺炎分类,该分类经过修改适用于儿科(根据建议标准定义的儿科呼吸机相关性肺炎[PVAP])。我们评估了根据传统标准诊断为呼吸机相关性肺炎的患儿队列中 PVAP 的发生频率,并比较了其与临床相关结局的关联强度。
回顾性队列研究。
三级儿科医院。
2006 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间从感染控制数据库中确定了患有呼吸机相关性肺炎的危重症患儿(0-18 岁)。如果患者接受高频通气、体外膜肺氧合或拔管后 24 小时内重新插管,则将其排除在外。
无。
评估患者是否符合 PVAP 诊断标准。主要结局是诊断为 PVAP 的患者比例。次要结局包括与护理间隔的关联。共有 277 名被诊断为呼吸机相关性肺炎的患儿符合审查条件;46 名因呼吸机通气时间不足 48 小时(n = 16)、高频通气(n = 12)、体外膜肺氧合(n = 8)、培养物中分离出不适当的细菌(n = 8)和其他原因(n = 4)而被排除在外。入住 ICU 的诊断包括先天性心脏病(47%)、神经系统疾病(16%)、创伤(7%)、呼吸系统疾病(7%)、移植后(4%)、神经肌肉疾病(3%)和心肌病(3%)。只有 16%的患者(n = 45)符合新的 PVAP 定义,18%的患者(n = 49)有任何呼吸机相关性疾病。未满足新定义是基于 90%的平均气道压力或 92%的 FIO2 增加不足。PVAP 与通气时间延长(中位数[四分位距],29 d[13-51 d] vs 16 d[8-34.5 d];p = 0.002)、入住 ICU(中位数[四分位距],40 d[20-100 d] vs 25 d[14-61 d];p = 0.004)和住院时间(中位数[四分位距],81 d[40-182 d] vs 54 d[31-108 d];p = 0.04)和死亡(33% vs 16%;p = 0.008)有关。
符合呼吸机相关性肺炎诊断的患儿中,很少有符合建议的 PVAP 标准。PVAP 与发病率和死亡率增加有关。这项工作表明,在为儿童引入新的呼吸机相关性肺炎定义之前,需要进行更多的研究。