• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国宫颈癌预防过度筛查和漏筛的效率低下

Inefficiencies of over-screening and under-screening for cervical cancer prevention in the U.S.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2018 Jun;111:177-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.011
PMID:29548787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5930058/
Abstract

There is limited information on the cost-inefficiencies of non-adherence to recommended cervical cancer screening or the potential value for improving non-adherence. We estimated the incremental value of adhering to recommended screening every three years with cytology, using a disease simulation model that integrated real-world screening practice data from New Mexico. The amount that can be spent to improve adherence was estimated by calculating the incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) under scenarios of Current Practice (assuming a population of mixed adherence) and Uniformly Non-Adherent populations with imperfect or perfect adherence to follow-up of screen-positive women. Getting unscreened women screened every three years by cytology was a better value than increasing screening in the under-screened or reducing screening in the over-screened. For example, INMBs were $3998 for screening previously unscreened women versus $136 for eliminating annual screening at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Strategies to reach unscreened women are potentially high-value investments.

摘要

关于不遵守推荐的宫颈癌筛查的成本效率或改善不遵守的潜在价值的信息有限。我们使用一种疾病模拟模型,该模型整合了新墨西哥州的真实筛查实践数据,估计了每三年通过细胞学检查坚持推荐筛查的增量价值。通过计算当前实践(假设混合依从性人群)和完全不依从随访的人群(对筛查阳性女性的依从性不完全或完全)的增量净货币收益(INMB),可以估计出提高依从性的花费。通过细胞学检查让未筛查的女性每三年接受一次筛查,比增加筛查不足或减少过度筛查的价值更高。例如,在愿意支付每获得一个质量调整生命年 10 万美元的阈值下,对以前未筛查的女性进行筛查的增量净货币收益为 3998 美元,而消除每年筛查的增量净货币收益为 136 美元。针对未筛查女性的策略可能是高价值的投资。

相似文献

1
Inefficiencies of over-screening and under-screening for cervical cancer prevention in the U.S.美国宫颈癌预防过度筛查和漏筛的效率低下
Prev Med. 2018 Jun;111:177-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
2
Inefficiencies and High-Value Improvements in U.S. Cervical Cancer Screening Practice: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.美国宫颈癌筛查实践中的效率低下和高价值改进:成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Oct 20;163(8):589-97. doi: 10.7326/M15-0420. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
3
The value of improving failures within a cervical cancer screening program: an example from Norway.改善宫颈癌筛查项目中漏诊情况的价值:来自挪威的一个例子。
Int J Cancer. 2014 Oct 15;135(8):1931-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28838. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
4
Adapting cervical cancer screening for women vaccinated against human papillomavirus infections: The value of stratifying guidelines.针对 HPV 疫苗接种女性的宫颈癌筛查策略调整:分层指南的价值。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Mar;91:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.12.018. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
5
Cost effectiveness of human papillomavirus testing to augment cervical cancer screening in women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.人乳头瘤病毒检测在感染人类免疫缺陷病毒女性中加强宫颈癌筛查的成本效益
Am J Med. 2001 Aug;111(2):140-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00780-x.
6
Optimal Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus.接种人乳头瘤病毒疫苗女性的最佳宫颈癌筛查
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Oct 18;109(2). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw216. Print 2017 Feb.
7
Summaries for patients. Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening in women older than 30 years in the United States.患者摘要。美国30岁以上女性人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种和宫颈癌筛查的成本效益。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Oct 20;151(8):I36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-8-200910200-00002.
8
The budget impact of cervical cancer screening using HPV primary screening.采用人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)初筛进行宫颈癌筛查的预算影响
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Mar 1;22(3):e95-105.
9
To expand coverage, or increase frequency: Quantifying the tradeoffs between equity and efficiency facing cervical cancer screening programs in low-resource settings.为扩大覆盖范围或提高筛查频率:量化资源匮乏地区宫颈癌筛查项目在公平性与效率之间面临的权衡。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Mar 15;140(6):1293-1305. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30551.
10
Cost-effectiveness of increasing cervical cancer screening coverage in the Middle East: An example from Lebanon.提高中东地区宫颈癌筛查覆盖率的成本效益:以黎巴嫩为例。
Vaccine. 2017 Jan 23;35(4):564-569. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.12.015. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention Strategies and Early Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer: Current State and Prospects.宫颈癌的预防策略与早期诊断:现状与展望
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 7;13(4):610. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040610.
2
Assessment of US Preventive Services Task Force Guideline-Concordant Cervical Cancer Screening Rates and Reasons for Underscreening by Age, Race and Ethnicity, Sexual Orientation, Rurality, and Insurance, 2005 to 2019.评估 2005 年至 2019 年期间,按年龄、种族和民族、性取向、农村和保险状况划分的美国预防服务工作组指南一致的宫颈癌筛查率和筛查不足的原因。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2143582. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43582.
3
Effect of introducing human papillomavirus genotyping into real-world screening on cervical cancer screening in China: a retrospective population-based cohort study.将人乳头瘤病毒基因分型引入中国真实世界宫颈癌筛查的效果:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Apr 28;13:17588359211010939. doi: 10.1177/17588359211010939. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Harms of cervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands.美国和荷兰宫颈癌筛查的危害。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Mar 1;140(5):1215-1222. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30524.
2
Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.根据锥形切除深度对宫颈浸润前和早期浸润性疾病进行局部治疗后的不良产科结局:系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Jul 28;354:i3633. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3633.
3
Inefficiencies and High-Value Improvements in U.S. Cervical Cancer Screening Practice: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.美国宫颈癌筛查实践中的效率低下和高价值改进:成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Oct 20;163(8):589-97. doi: 10.7326/M15-0420. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
4
Acceptable and Preferred Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals Among U.S. Women.美国女性可接受的和首选的宫颈癌筛查间隔
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Dec;49(6):e99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.025. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
5
Effect of self-collection of HPV DNA offered by community health workers at home visits on uptake of screening for cervical cancer (the EMA study): a population-based cluster-randomised trial.社区卫生工作者上门提供 HPV DNA 自我采集对宫颈癌筛查参与度的影响(EMA 研究):一项基于人群的整群随机试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Feb;3(2):e85-94. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70354-7.
6
Updating cost-effectiveness--the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold.更新成本效益——每质量调整生命年5万美元阈值令人好奇的韧性。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 28;371(9):796-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1405158.
7
Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis.人乳头瘤病毒自我采集与临床医生采集样本检测的准确性:荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):172-83. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70570-9. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
8
American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.美国癌症协会、美国阴道镜和宫颈病理学会以及美国临床病理学会宫颈癌预防和早期检测筛查指南。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 May-Jun;62(3):147-72. doi: 10.3322/caac.21139. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
9
Comparative community outreach to increase cervical cancer screening in the Mississippi Delta.比较社区外展活动以增加密西西比三角洲的宫颈癌筛查。
Prev Med. 2011 Jun;52(6):452-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.03.018. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
10
Cervical cancer prevention: new tools and old barriers.宫颈癌预防:新工具与旧障碍。
Cancer. 2010 Jun 1;116(11):2531-42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25065.