Bhambhwani Vishaal, Al Taie Rasha, Ku Judy, Mora Justin
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand; Auckland Eye, 8 St Marks Road, Auckland, New Zealand.
J AAPOS. 2018 Apr;22(2):89-91.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.11.008. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
To analyze the additive effect of supplementing verbal consent with written patient information sheets in optimizing patients' and families' understanding of strabismus surgery.
A prospective randomized study was conducted with 28 patients for strabismus surgery randomized into two groups: group 1 with standardized oral informed consent, and group 2 with standardized oral consent and a written information sheet. A confidential questionnaire with 13 questions was completed by patients and families before surgery.
A total of 7 adults and 21 children were included in the study. The mean score (number of correct answers) for group 1 was 4.14 ± 1.99; for group 2, 5.79 ± 2.12 (P = 0.044), indicating that patients and families in group 2 understood their strabismus surgery better than those in group 1. Areas needing more emphasis during the consent process were identified, including risk of under- or overcorrection or repeat surgery and use of eyedrops postoperatively.
In this study, patient information sheets seemed to help patients and families better understand information about their surgery. Patient recall of information provided is poorly reliable and must be considered in decision making for medicolegal cases.
分析在优化患者及其家属对斜视手术的理解方面,补充书面患者信息表与口头同意书的附加效果。
对28例斜视手术患者进行前瞻性随机研究,随机分为两组:第1组采用标准化口头知情同意,第2组采用标准化口头同意并辅以书面信息表。患者及其家属在手术前完成一份包含13个问题的保密问卷。
本研究共纳入7名成人和21名儿童。第1组的平均得分(正确答案数)为4.14±1.99;第2组为5.79±2.12(P = 0.044),表明第2组的患者及其家属对斜视手术的理解优于第1组。确定了在同意过程中需要更加强调的方面,包括矫正不足或过度矫正或再次手术的风险以及术后眼药水的使用。
在本研究中,患者信息表似乎有助于患者及其家属更好地理解有关其手术的信息。患者对所提供信息的回忆可靠性较差,在医疗法律案件的决策中必须予以考虑。