Nikolova Mirela, Jainta Stephanie, Blythe Hazel I, Liversedge Simon P
School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
FHNW - University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, School of Engineering, Institute of Optometry, Riggenbachstrasse 16, CH - 4600 Olten, Switzerland.
Vision Res. 2018 Apr;145:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
During reading, binocular visual input results in superior performance and is particularly important in the pre-processing of parafoveal text prior to direct fixation. It is not yet clear whether binocular vision in the parafovea is necessary for accurate saccadic targeting, or for efficient pre-processing of upcoming text, prior to direct fixation. In the present sentence reading experiment, we used a dichoptic gaze-contingent moving window paradigm in order to establish 1) how much parafoveal binocular input is necessary for fluent reading and 2) which aspect of parafoveal processing is more reliant on binocular vision. Eye movement measures revealed that reading was disrupted unless word N + 1 was entirely binocular in the parafovea, though no additional benefit was observed when word N + 2 was also binocular. Additionally, while fixation durations and reading times were clearly affected by the manipulation, similarly pronounced changes in binocular saccadic parameters such as accuracy, speed, amplitude and velocity were not observed. We concluded that the disruption to reading caused by presenting monocular text to the right of fixation cannot be attributed to difficulties in targeting binocular saccacdes, but instead results from a decreased efficiency in the pre-processing of parafoveal text. These results provide further demonstration for the importance of binocular vision during written text processing.
在阅读过程中,双眼视觉输入能带来更优的表现,并且在直接注视之前对中央凹旁文本的预处理中尤为重要。目前尚不清楚,在中央凹旁的双眼视觉对于准确的扫视目标定位是否必要,或者对于直接注视之前即将出现的文本进行高效预处理是否必要。在当前的句子阅读实验中,我们使用了一种双眼凝视关联移动窗口范式,以确定:1)流畅阅读需要多少中央凹旁的双眼输入;2)中央凹旁处理的哪个方面更依赖双眼视觉。眼动测量结果显示,除非中央凹旁的单词N + 1完全是双眼可见的,否则阅读就会受到干扰,不过当单词N + 2也是双眼可见时,并未观察到额外的益处。此外,虽然注视持续时间和阅读时间明显受到该操作的影响,但在双眼扫视参数(如准确性、速度、幅度和速度)方面,并未观察到同样明显的变化。我们得出结论,在注视点右侧呈现单眼文本所导致的阅读干扰,不能归因于双眼扫视目标定位的困难,而是源于中央凹旁文本预处理效率的降低。这些结果进一步证明了双眼视觉在书面文本处理过程中的重要性。