Orduna-Hospital Elvira, Munarriz-Escribano María, Sanchez-Cano Ana
Department of Applied Physics, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Life (Basel). 2023 Aug 20;13(8):1777. doi: 10.3390/life13081777.
The purpose of this study was to objectively evaluate visual discomfort using an eye tracker and aberrometer after a 21-min reading session on an iPad and an Ebook. Additionally, retinal changes were analyzed using optical coherence tomography (OCT).
A total of 31 young subjects (24 ± 4 years) participated in this study. They read for 21 min on an Ebook and for another 21 min on an iPad under controlled lighting conditions while their eye movements were monitored using an eye tracker. Aberrometry and retinal OCT measurements were taken before and after each reading session. Parameters such as pupil diameter, fixations, saccades, blinks, total aberration, high-order aberration, low-order aberration, and central and peripheral retinal thickness in the nine early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) areas were measured for each reading situation. Statistical analysis was performed on the collected data.
No statistically significant differences ( > 0.05) between the two devices were observed in terms of the different types of eye movements or the changes in retinal thickness. However, the aberrometric analysis showed variations in post-reading situations depending on the device used.
Reading speed and visual discomfort resulting from electronic device usage can be objectively assessed using an eye tracker and aberrometer. Additionally, changes found in central and peripheral retinal thickness between the two devices and the baseline measurements were not significant and remained relatively stable.
本研究的目的是在使用iPad和电子书进行21分钟阅读后,使用眼动仪和像差仪客观评估视觉不适。此外,使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)分析视网膜变化。
共有31名年轻受试者(24±4岁)参与本研究。他们在可控照明条件下,先在电子书上阅读21分钟,然后在iPad上再阅读21分钟,同时使用眼动仪监测他们的眼动。在每次阅读前后进行像差测量和视网膜OCT测量。针对每种阅读情况,测量诸如瞳孔直径、注视、扫视、眨眼、总像差、高阶像差、低阶像差以及九个早期治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)区域的中央和周边视网膜厚度等参数。对收集到的数据进行统计分析。
在两种设备之间,就不同类型的眼动或视网膜厚度变化而言,未观察到统计学上的显著差异(>0.05)。然而,像差分析显示,阅读后的情况因使用的设备而异。
使用眼动仪和像差仪可以客观评估电子设备使用导致的阅读速度和视觉不适。此外,两种设备与基线测量之间在中央和周边视网膜厚度上发现的变化并不显著,且保持相对稳定。