文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

关注序贯逻辑回归分析 RDI 的培非格司亭预防用药患者的预测因素。

Predictive factors in patients eligible for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis focusing on RDI using ordered logistic regression analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.

Outpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Med Oncol. 2018 Mar 16;35(4):55. doi: 10.1007/s12032-018-1116-5.


DOI:10.1007/s12032-018-1116-5
PMID:29549536
Abstract

Although pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is expected to maintain the relative dose intensity (RDI) of chemotherapy and improve safety, information is limited. However, the optimal selection of patients eligible for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is an important issue from a medical economics viewpoint. Therefore, this retrospective study identified factors that could predict these eligible patients to maintain the RDI. The participants included 166 cancer patients undergoing pegfilgrastim prophylaxis combined with chemotherapy in our outpatient chemotherapy center between March 2015 and April 2017. Variables were extracted from clinical records for regression analysis of factors related to maintenance of the RDI. RDI was classified into four categories: 100% = 0, 85% or < 100% = 1, 60% or < 85% = 2, and < 60% = 3. Multivariate ordered logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors in patients eligible for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis to maintain the RDI. Threshold measures were examined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis curve. Age [odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.11; P < 0.0001], anemia (grade) (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.10-2.84; P = 0.0184), and administration 24-72 h after chemotherapy (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.89; P = 0.0224) were factors that significantly correlated with RDI maintenance. ROC curve analysis of the group that failed to maintain the RDI indicated that the threshold for age was 70 years and above, with a sensitivity of 60.0% and specificity of 80.2% (area under the curve: 0.74). In conclusion, younger age, anemia (less), and administration of pegfilgrastim 24-72 h after chemotherapy were significant factors for RDI maintenance.

摘要

虽然培非格司亭预防治疗预计能维持化疗的相对剂量强度(RDI)并提高安全性,但相关信息有限。然而,从医疗经济学的角度来看,选择合适的接受培非格司亭预防治疗的患者是一个重要问题。因此,本回顾性研究旨在确定可预测这些有资格接受培非格司亭预防治疗的患者维持 RDI 的因素。参与者包括 2015 年 3 月至 2017 年 4 月在我们的门诊化疗中心接受培非格司亭预防治疗联合化疗的 166 名癌症患者。从临床记录中提取变量,进行回归分析以确定与维持 RDI 相关的因素。RDI 分为四类:100%=0、85%或<100%=1、60%或<85%=2、<60%=3。采用多变量有序逻辑回归分析识别有资格接受培非格司亭预防治疗以维持 RDI 的患者的预测因素。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析曲线检查阈值测量值。年龄[比值比(OR)1.07,95%置信区间(CI)1.04-1.11;P<0.0001]、贫血(等级)(OR 1.77,95%CI 1.10-2.84;P=0.0184)和化疗后 24-72 小时给药(OR 0.44,95%CI 0.22-0.89;P=0.0224)是与 RDI 维持显著相关的因素。未能维持 RDI 组的 ROC 曲线分析表明,年龄的阈值为 70 岁及以上,敏感性为 60.0%,特异性为 80.2%(曲线下面积:0.74)。结论:年龄较小、贫血(较轻)和化疗后 24-72 小时给予培非格司亭是 RDI 维持的重要因素。

相似文献

[1]
Predictive factors in patients eligible for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis focusing on RDI using ordered logistic regression analysis.

Med Oncol. 2018-3-16

[2]
Use and effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice:a retrospective observational study.

BMC Cancer. 2019-8-9

[3]
Retrospective analysis of relative dose intensity in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving CHOP-based chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim.

Am J Clin Oncol. 2014-12

[4]
Biosimilar Pegfilgrastim: Improving Access and Optimising Practice to Supportive Care that Enables Cure.

BioDrugs. 2020-6

[5]
Cost-efficiency analyses for the US of biosimilar filgrastim-sndz, reference filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and pegfilgrastim with on-body injector in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia.

J Med Econ. 2017-10

[6]
Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia by day of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice from 2010 to 2015.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2017-12

[7]
Chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim in elderly versus non-elderly cancer patients: Patterns, outcomes, and determinants (MONITOR-GCSF study).

J Geriatr Oncol. 2016-11-6

[8]
Randomized phase 3 efficacy and safety trial of proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar MYL-1401H in the prophylactic treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Ann Hematol. 2019-3-1

[9]
[Effect of Pegfilgrastim Primary Prophylactic Administration on Relative Dose Intensity(RDI)in Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy(TC Therapy)for Breast Cancer - A Single-Center, Retrospective Study].

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2017-12

[10]
Optimal timing for pegfilgrastim administration in Japanese breast cancer patients receiving intermediate-risk chemotherapies.

Int J Clin Pharm. 2018-10

引用本文的文献

[1]
Pegfilgrastim Maintains Relative Dose Intensity and Decreases Hospitalisations in Patients With Endometrial Cancer.

In Vivo. 2020

本文引用的文献

[1]
Impact of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and febrile neutropenia (FN) on cancer treatment outcomes: An overview about well-established and recently emerging clinical data.

Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017-11-11

[2]
The effectiveness and safety of same-day versus next-day administration of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a systematic review.

Support Care Cancer. 2017-8

[3]
Trajectory of absolute neutrophil counts in patients treated with pegfilgrastim on the day of chemotherapy versus the day after chemotherapy.

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016-4

[4]
Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?

Support Care Cancer. 2016-5

[5]
Recommendations for the Use of WBC Growth Factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.

J Clin Oncol. 2015-7-13

[6]
Evaluation of the Hematologic Safety of Same Day Versus Standard Administration (24- to 72-Hour Delay) of Pegfilgrastim in Gynecology Oncology Patients Undergoing Cytotoxic Chemotherapy.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015-9

[7]
The effect of filgrastim or pegfilgrastim on survival outcomes of patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Ann Oncol. 2015-4-7

[8]
The impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors on febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Support Care Cancer. 2015-11

[9]
The impact of the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on chemotherapy dose intensity and cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ann Oncol. 2013-6-20

[10]
Primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factors for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-10-17

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索