• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培非格司亭维持子宫内膜癌患者的相对剂量强度并减少住院治疗。

Pegfilgrastim Maintains Relative Dose Intensity and Decreases Hospitalisations in Patients With Endometrial Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

In Vivo. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):3669-3673. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12214.

DOI:10.21873/invivo.12214
PMID:33144483
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7811652/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Data are limited regarding the use of pegfilgrastim in gynaecologic oncology. We evaluated its efficacy for maintaining dose intensity during chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined the data of 65 women (26 pegfilgrastim users) who underwent primary surgical treatment for stages IB-IV endometrial cancer and had adjuvant chemotherapy containing platinum and taxane; the primary outcome was a relative dose intensity ≥85%.

RESULTS

In the pegfilgrastim vs. the control group, body mass index (26.6±5.9 vs. 23.4±4.4), rate of relative dose intensity ≥85% (88.5% vs. 15.4%), plus other adverse event incidences were significantly higher; rate of neutropenia, total hospital visits during chemotherapy (11.0±2.1 vs. 18±5.6 days), unscheduled hospital visits (1.1±1.8 vs. 5.8±5.1 days), and unscheduled granulocyte colony-stimulating factor injections (0.58±1.7 vs. 6.4±5.1 days) were significantly lower.

CONCLUSION

Pegfilgrastim can maintain a dose intensity of ≥85% during chemotherapy for the treatment of gynaecologic cancers and decrease hospital-visit frequency.

摘要

背景/目的:关于在妇科肿瘤学中使用培非格司亭的数据有限。我们评估了其在维持化疗期间剂量强度的疗效。

患者和方法

我们回顾性地检查了 65 名女性(26 名培非格司亭使用者)的数据,这些女性接受了原发性手术治疗,用于 I B-IV 期子宫内膜癌,并接受了含铂和紫杉烷的辅助化疗;主要结果是相对剂量强度≥85%。

结果

在培非格司亭组与对照组相比,体重指数(26.6±5.9 vs. 23.4±4.4)、相对剂量强度≥85%的发生率(88.5% vs. 15.4%)和其他不良事件发生率显著更高;中性粒细胞减少症发生率、化疗期间总住院天数(11.0±2.1 vs. 18±5.6 天)、非计划住院天数(1.1±1.8 vs. 5.8±5.1 天)和非计划粒细胞集落刺激因子注射天数(0.58±1.7 vs. 6.4±5.1 天)显著降低。

结论

培非格司亭可维持妇科癌症化疗期间的剂量强度≥85%,并降低住院频率。

相似文献

1
Pegfilgrastim Maintains Relative Dose Intensity and Decreases Hospitalisations in Patients With Endometrial Cancer.培非格司亭维持子宫内膜癌患者的相对剂量强度并减少住院治疗。
In Vivo. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):3669-3673. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12214.
2
Effect of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in endometrial cancer patients treated with doxorubicin and cisplatin.多柔比星和顺铂治疗的子宫内膜癌患者中培非格司亭的初级预防作用。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar;61(2):265-269. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2022.02.013.
3
Comparison of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to prevent neutropenia and maintain dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.比较非格司亭和聚乙二醇化非格司亭预防乳腺癌患者中性粒细胞减少并维持辅助化疗剂量强度的效果。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jul;23(7):2045-51. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2555-y. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
4
Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer.化疗所致中性粒细胞减少症中,每周期一次的聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子与每日注射重组人粒细胞刺激因子的疗效和安全性比较:一项针对乳腺癌女性患者的多中心剂量探索性研究。
Ann Oncol. 2002 Jun;13(6):903-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf130.
5
Evaluation of the Hematologic Safety of Same Day Versus Standard Administration (24- to 72-Hour Delay) of Pegfilgrastim in Gynecology Oncology Patients Undergoing Cytotoxic Chemotherapy.培非格司亭在接受细胞毒性化疗的妇科肿瘤患者中当日给药与标准给药(延迟24至72小时)的血液学安全性评估。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Sep;25(7):1331-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000487.
6
The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.在英国,乳腺癌患者使用培非格司亭预防性治疗相比使用非格司亭的经济学价值。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2009;7(3):193-205. doi: 10.1007/BF03256152.
7
A modified filgrastim regimen does not reduce pain burden compared to pegfilgrastim in women receiving chemotherapy for non-metastatic breast cancer.与聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子相比,改良型非格司亭方案并不能减轻接受非转移性乳腺癌化疗的女性的疼痛负担。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jun;23(6):1669-77. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2449-z. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
8
Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.在美国接受CHOP-21方案治疗的非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中,聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子与6天疗程重组人粒细胞刺激因子用于一级预防的成本效益比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Feb;25(2):401-11. doi: 10.1185/03007990802636817.
9
Eflapegrastim, a Long-Acting Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor for the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia: Results of a Phase III Trial.依洛珠单抗,一种长效粒细胞集落刺激因子,用于治疗化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症:III 期临床试验结果。
Oncologist. 2020 Aug;25(8):e1233-e1241. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0105. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
10
A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.一项关于接受骨髓抑制性化疗的患者中,固定剂量单次给药聚乙二醇化非格司亭与每日注射非格司亭对比的随机双盲多中心III期研究。
Ann Oncol. 2003 Jan;14(1):29-35. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg019.

本文引用的文献

1
Action at a Distance: Geriatric Research during a Pandemic.隔空协作:大流行期间的老年医学研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 May;68(5):922-925. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16443. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
2
Predictive factors in patients eligible for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis focusing on RDI using ordered logistic regression analysis.关注序贯逻辑回归分析 RDI 的培非格司亭预防用药患者的预测因素。
Med Oncol. 2018 Mar 16;35(4):55. doi: 10.1007/s12032-018-1116-5.
3
[Effect of Pegfilgrastim Primary Prophylactic Administration on Relative Dose Intensity(RDI)in Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy(TC Therapy)for Breast Cancer - A Single-Center, Retrospective Study].培非格司亭预防性给药对乳腺癌术后辅助化疗(TC方案)相对剂量强度(RDI)的影响——一项单中心回顾性研究
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2017 Dec;44(13):2087-2090.
4
Refining the role of pegfilgrastim (a long-acting G-CSF) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: consensus guidance recommendations.优化聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子(长效粒细胞集落刺激因子)在预防化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症中的作用:共识性指导建议
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Nov;25(11):3295-3304. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3842-1. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
5
Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of lipegfilgrastim with pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related events.聚乙二醇非格司亭与聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子及非格司亭用于减少化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少相关事件的荟萃分析及间接治疗比较
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2018 Sep;24(6):412-423. doi: 10.1177/1078155217714859. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
6
Healthcare Expenditure Burden Among Non-elderly Cancer Survivors, 2008-2012.2008 - 2012年非老年癌症幸存者的医疗保健支出负担
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Dec;49(6 Suppl 5):S489-97. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.002.
7
A review of relative dose intensity and survival in patients with metastatic solid tumors.转移性实体瘤患者的相对剂量强度与生存的回顾性研究。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015 Mar;93(3):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
8
Medical costs and productivity losses of cancer survivors--United States, 2008-2011.癌症幸存者的医疗费用和生产力损失——美国,2008-2011 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Jun 13;63(23):505-10.
9
Estimating the health and economic burden of cancer among those diagnosed as adolescents and young adults.评估青少年及青年癌症患者的健康和经济负担。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jun;33(6):1024-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1425.
10
Retrospective analysis of the use of G-CSF and its impact on dose response for anthracycline plus taxane-based schedules in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌中粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的使用及其对蒽环类药物加紫杉类方案剂量反应影响的回顾性分析。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2014 Sep;16(9):814-22. doi: 10.1007/s12094-013-1153-7. Epub 2014 Feb 15.