文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

培非格司亭维持子宫内膜癌患者的相对剂量强度并减少住院治疗。

Pegfilgrastim Maintains Relative Dose Intensity and Decreases Hospitalisations in Patients With Endometrial Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

In Vivo. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):3669-3673. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12214.


DOI:10.21873/invivo.12214
PMID:33144483
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7811652/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Data are limited regarding the use of pegfilgrastim in gynaecologic oncology. We evaluated its efficacy for maintaining dose intensity during chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined the data of 65 women (26 pegfilgrastim users) who underwent primary surgical treatment for stages IB-IV endometrial cancer and had adjuvant chemotherapy containing platinum and taxane; the primary outcome was a relative dose intensity ≥85%. RESULTS: In the pegfilgrastim vs. the control group, body mass index (26.6±5.9 vs. 23.4±4.4), rate of relative dose intensity ≥85% (88.5% vs. 15.4%), plus other adverse event incidences were significantly higher; rate of neutropenia, total hospital visits during chemotherapy (11.0±2.1 vs. 18±5.6 days), unscheduled hospital visits (1.1±1.8 vs. 5.8±5.1 days), and unscheduled granulocyte colony-stimulating factor injections (0.58±1.7 vs. 6.4±5.1 days) were significantly lower. CONCLUSION: Pegfilgrastim can maintain a dose intensity of ≥85% during chemotherapy for the treatment of gynaecologic cancers and decrease hospital-visit frequency.

摘要

背景/目的:关于在妇科肿瘤学中使用培非格司亭的数据有限。我们评估了其在维持化疗期间剂量强度的疗效。 患者和方法:我们回顾性地检查了 65 名女性(26 名培非格司亭使用者)的数据,这些女性接受了原发性手术治疗,用于 I B-IV 期子宫内膜癌,并接受了含铂和紫杉烷的辅助化疗;主要结果是相对剂量强度≥85%。 结果:在培非格司亭组与对照组相比,体重指数(26.6±5.9 vs. 23.4±4.4)、相对剂量强度≥85%的发生率(88.5% vs. 15.4%)和其他不良事件发生率显著更高;中性粒细胞减少症发生率、化疗期间总住院天数(11.0±2.1 vs. 18±5.6 天)、非计划住院天数(1.1±1.8 vs. 5.8±5.1 天)和非计划粒细胞集落刺激因子注射天数(0.58±1.7 vs. 6.4±5.1 天)显著降低。 结论:培非格司亭可维持妇科癌症化疗期间的剂量强度≥85%,并降低住院频率。

相似文献

[1]
Pegfilgrastim Maintains Relative Dose Intensity and Decreases Hospitalisations in Patients With Endometrial Cancer.

In Vivo. 2020

[2]
Effect of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in endometrial cancer patients treated with doxorubicin and cisplatin.

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2022-3

[3]
Comparison of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to prevent neutropenia and maintain dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Support Care Cancer. 2015-7

[4]
Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer.

Ann Oncol. 2002-6

[5]
Evaluation of the Hematologic Safety of Same Day Versus Standard Administration (24- to 72-Hour Delay) of Pegfilgrastim in Gynecology Oncology Patients Undergoing Cytotoxic Chemotherapy.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015-9

[6]
The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2009

[7]
A modified filgrastim regimen does not reduce pain burden compared to pegfilgrastim in women receiving chemotherapy for non-metastatic breast cancer.

Support Care Cancer. 2015-6

[8]
Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2009-2

[9]
Eflapegrastim, a Long-Acting Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor for the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia: Results of a Phase III Trial.

Oncologist. 2020-8

[10]
A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Ann Oncol. 2003-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Action at a Distance: Geriatric Research during a Pandemic.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020-4-3

[2]
Predictive factors in patients eligible for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis focusing on RDI using ordered logistic regression analysis.

Med Oncol. 2018-3-16

[3]
[Effect of Pegfilgrastim Primary Prophylactic Administration on Relative Dose Intensity(RDI)in Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy(TC Therapy)for Breast Cancer - A Single-Center, Retrospective Study].

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2017-12

[4]
Refining the role of pegfilgrastim (a long-acting G-CSF) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: consensus guidance recommendations.

Support Care Cancer. 2017-11

[5]
Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of lipegfilgrastim with pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related events.

J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2018-9

[6]
Healthcare Expenditure Burden Among Non-elderly Cancer Survivors, 2008-2012.

Am J Prev Med. 2015-12

[7]
A review of relative dose intensity and survival in patients with metastatic solid tumors.

Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014-10-12

[8]
Medical costs and productivity losses of cancer survivors--United States, 2008-2011.

MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014-6-13

[9]
Estimating the health and economic burden of cancer among those diagnosed as adolescents and young adults.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2014-6

[10]
Retrospective analysis of the use of G-CSF and its impact on dose response for anthracycline plus taxane-based schedules in early breast cancer.

Clin Transl Oncol. 2014-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索