Okholm Cecilie, Fjederholt Kaare Terp, Mortensen Frank Viborg, Svendsen Lars Bo, Achiam Michael Patrick
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Department of Surgery, Section for Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepato-pancreato-biliary urgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar;27(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
The aim of this study was to refine the optimal lymph node dissection in Western patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).
Lymphadenectomy is essential in addition to surgery for AEG. Asian studies continually present superior survival rates using a more extended lymphadenectomy compared with results reproduced in the West. Thus, the optimal extend of the lymphadenectomy remains unclear in Western patients.
A retrospective cohort was conducted of patients with AEG from January 1st, 2003 to December 31st, 2011. All patients undergoing curatively intended surgery was included. Two types of resections were constructed; Res1 included patients where only the loco regional lymph nodes were removed (station 1-4, 7 and 9) and Res2 included the additional removal of the more distant stations 8 and/or 11.
We identified 510 patients with AEG. The highest frequency of lymph node metastases was seen in the loco regional stations 1-3, 7 and 9, ranging from 34% to 41.4%. There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups; the median survival rate for Res1 was 30.4 months compared to 24.1 months for Res2 (p = 0.157). Furthermore, the extend of lymph node dissection seemed to have no effect on survival (HR = 1.061, 95%CI 0.84-1.33).
No significant difference in survival between the extended and the less extended lymphadenectomy was found. The presence of metastases in distant lymph nodes indicates poor survival and may represent disseminated disease. We do not find evidence that supports an extended lymph node dissection in Western patients.
本研究旨在优化西方食管胃交界腺癌(AEG)患者的淋巴结清扫术。
除手术外,淋巴结切除术对AEG至关重要。与西方的研究结果相比,亚洲的研究不断表明,采用更广泛的淋巴结清扫术可获得更高的生存率。因此,西方患者淋巴结清扫术的最佳范围仍不明确。
对2003年1月1日至2011年12月31日期间的AEG患者进行回顾性队列研究。纳入所有接受根治性手术的患者。构建了两种切除类型;Res1包括仅切除局部区域淋巴结(第1-4、7和9组)的患者,Res2包括额外切除更远端的第8和/或11组淋巴结。
我们确定了510例AEG患者。局部区域第1-3、7和9组淋巴结转移的频率最高,范围为34%至41.4%。两组的总生存率无差异;Res1组的中位生存率为30.4个月,而Res2组为24.1个月(p = 0.157)。此外,淋巴结清扫范围似乎对生存率没有影响(HR = 1.061,95%CI 0.84-1.33)。
在广泛和较少广泛的淋巴结清扫术之间未发现生存率有显著差异。远处淋巴结转移的存在表明生存率较低,可能代表疾病已播散。我们没有找到支持西方患者进行广泛淋巴结清扫术的证据。