Department of Digestive Internal Medicine, Gannan Medical University Pingxiang Hospital, 128 Guangchang Road, Pingxiang, 337055, People's Republic of China; Department of International School of Nursing, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 571199, People's Republic of China.
Department of International School of Nursing, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 571199, People's Republic of China; Laboratory of Shock, Department of Pathophysiology, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, People's Republic of China.
Pancreatology. 2018 Jun;18(4):370-378. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
To perform a meta-analysis of all available studies on the effect of prophylactic somatostatin administration on prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) and post-ERCP hyperamylasemia (PEHA).
Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and the Science Citation Index were searched to retrieve relevant trials. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials in adult patients that compared somatostatin versus placebo in prevention of PEP were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to assess the ratios of PEP, PEHA and post-ERCP abdominal pain.
Total ratio of PEP of somatostatin group was significantly lower than that of placebo group. For the short-term injection or bolus injection there were no heterogeneity and no significance between the ratio of PEP of somatostatin group and placebo group. For the long-term injection subgroup there was heterogeneity, and the ratio of PEP of somatostatin group was significantly lower than that of placebo group. There was no significance between the ratio of PEP of somatostatin group and placebo group for the low-risk PEP subgroup, while the ratio of PEP of somatostatin group was significantly lower than that of placebo group for the high-risk PEP subgroup. The ratio of PEP of somatostatin group was significantly lower than that of placebo group for the long-term injection high-risk PEP subgroup. There was no significance between the ratio of PEHA of somatostatin group and placebo group for the short-term injection subgroup or bolus injection subgroup. The ratio of PEHA of somatostatin group was significantly lower than that of placebo group for the long-term injection subgroup. The total ratio of post-ERCP abdominal pain of somatostatin group was significantly lower than that of placebo group. The funnel plot of incidence of PEP and PEHA showed no asymmetry with a negative slope.
Prophylactic use of long-term injection of somatostatin can significantly reduce the incidence of PEP, PEHA and post-ERCP abdominal pain for the high-risk PEP patients, while it is not necessary to be used for the low-risk PEP patients.
对所有关于生长抑素预防经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后胰腺炎(PEP)和 ERCP 后高淀粉酶血症(PEHA)的研究进行荟萃分析。
检索电子数据库,包括 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和科学引文索引,以检索相关试验。纳入比较生长抑素与安慰剂预防 PEP 的成人患者的随机、安慰剂对照试验。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以评估 PEP、PEHA 和 ERCP 后腹痛的比值。
生长抑素组 PEP 的总比值明显低于安慰剂组。对于短期注射或推注,生长抑素组和安慰剂组的 PEP 比值无异质性且无统计学意义。对于长期注射亚组,存在异质性,生长抑素组的 PEP 比值明显低于安慰剂组。对于低危 PEP 亚组,生长抑素组和安慰剂组的 PEP 比值无统计学意义,而高危 PEP 亚组,生长抑素组的 PEP 比值明显低于安慰剂组。对于高危 PEP 长期注射亚组,生长抑素组的 PEP 比值明显低于安慰剂组。短期注射亚组或推注亚组,生长抑素组和安慰剂组的 PEHA 比值无统计学意义。对于长期注射亚组,生长抑素组的 PEHA 比值明显低于安慰剂组。生长抑素组的 ERCP 后腹痛总比值明显低于安慰剂组。PEP 和 PEHA 发生率的漏斗图显示无偏斜率的不对称。
预防性使用生长抑素长期注射可显著降低高危 PEP 患者 PEP、PEHA 和 ERCP 后腹痛的发生率,而对于低危 PEP 患者则无必要。