文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

基于代谢与减重外科认证和质量改进计划数据库的袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术 30 天结果:首次报告。

Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.

机构信息

Temple University/St Luke's University Health Network School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; St. Luke's University Health Network, Fountain Hill, Pennsylvania.

St. Luke's University Health Network, Fountain Hill, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 May;14(5):545-551. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Jan 13.


DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.011
PMID:29551470
Abstract

BACKGROUND: According to recent American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimates, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is now the most commonly performed procedure in the United States (~53.8% of all bariatric procedures), followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB; 23.1% of all procedures). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes and safety of these 2 procedures in the first 30 days postoperatively using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data registry. SETTING: University health network, United States. METHODS: We reviewed all SG and RYGB cases entered between January 1 and December 31, 2015 in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data registry. Demographic characteristics and 30-day outcomes were analyzed based on separate Mann-Whitney rank sums tests, χ, or Fisher's exact tests as appropriate, with P<.05 denoting statistical significance and no adjustment for multiple testing. RESULTS: A total of 141,646 patients were analyzed; 98,292 underwent SG and 43,354 underwent RYGB. Average age was 44.5 and 45.4 years for SG and RYGB, respectively. Preoperative body mass index was 45.1 and 46.1 for SG and RYGB, respectively. The 30-day mortality was .1% for SG and .2% for RYGB (P<.05). The incidence of unplanned intensive care unit admission after RYGB was twice as high compared with SG (1.3% versus .6%, respectively, P<.05). The incidence of at least 1 intervention or reoperation after RYGB was significantly higher compared with SG (2.8% and 2.5% for GB versus 1.2% and 1% for SG, P<.05). After RYGB, .4% of patients had a drain left in place at 30 days postoperatively versus .3% for SG (P<.05). The incidence of readmission was 2.8% for RYGB and 1.2% for SG (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative complications in the first 30 days after surgery is low for both RYGB and SG. However, SG seems to have a better safety profile in the first 30 days postoperatively compared with RYGB. These findings should be considered in the preoperative evaluation and counseling of bariatric patients. Long-term follow-up is needed to compare safety and efficacy of SG versus RYGB.

摘要

背景:根据美国代谢和减重外科学会最近的估计,袖状胃切除术(SG)现在是美国最常进行的手术(~53.8%的减重手术),其次是 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB;所有手术的 23.1%)。 目的:本研究旨在使用代谢和减重外科学会认证和质量改进计划数据登记处评估这两种手术术后 30 天内的结果和安全性。 设置:美国大学健康网络。 方法:我们回顾了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间在代谢和减重外科学会认证和质量改进计划数据登记处录入的所有 SG 和 RYGB 病例。根据单独的 Mann-Whitney 秩和检验、χ²或 Fisher 确切检验分析人口统计学特征和 30 天结果,P<.05 表示统计学意义,不进行多次检验调整。 结果:共分析了 141646 例患者;98292 例行 SG,43354 例行 RYGB。SG 和 RYGB 的平均年龄分别为 44.5 岁和 45.4 岁。SG 和 RYGB 的术前体重指数分别为 45.1 和 46.1。SG 的 30 天死亡率为.1%,RYGB 为.2%(P<.05)。RYGB 术后 ICU 入住率是 SG 的两倍(分别为 1.3%和.6%,P<.05)。RYGB 术后至少一次干预或再次手术的发生率明显高于 SG(GB 为 2.8%和 2.5%,SG 为 1.2%和 1%,P<.05)。RYGB 术后 30 天有 0.4%的患者留置引流管,而 SG 为 0.3%(P<.05)。RYGB 的再入院率为 2.8%,SG 为 1.2%(P<.05)。 结论:RYGB 和 SG 术后 30 天内并发症的发生率均较低。然而,SG 在术后 30 天内的安全性似乎优于 RYGB。这些发现应在术前评估和咨询减重患者时考虑。需要长期随访以比较 SG 与 RYGB 的安全性和疗效。

相似文献

[1]
Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018-1-13

[2]
Comparison of Short-term Safety of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in the United States: 341 cases from MBSAQIP-accredited Centers.

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022-3

[3]
Outcomes in racial minorities after robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective review of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021-3

[4]
Perioperative Outcomes of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: an Analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database.

Obes Surg. 2020-1

[5]
Robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-y gastric bypass: results from the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program data registry.

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019-4-13

[6]
Single stage conversion from adjustable gastric banding to sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an analysis of 4875 patients.

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017-7-15

[7]
Outcomes of adolescents compared with young adults after bariatric surgery: an analysis of 227,671 patients using the MBSAQIP data registry.

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020-10

[8]
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database.

Surg Endosc. 2018-9-17

[9]
Comparative effectiveness of 3 bariatric surgery procedures: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, and sleeve gastrectomy.

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016-6

[10]
Single-stage conversions from failed gastric band to sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from the United Kingdom National Bariatric Surgical Registry.

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018-6-30

引用本文的文献

[1]
Gastric Fundus Obstruction From Hiatal Hernia After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Case Report.

Cureus. 2025-7-15

[2]
The Early Days of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Narrative Review.

Obes Surg. 2025-4-10

[3]
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Profile of Bariatric Surgery in Patients Classified with ASA IV Status.

Obes Surg. 2025-3

[4]
RESULTS OF MECHANIC VERSUS MOTORIZED STAPLER USED IN GASTRIC SURGERY: PROSPECTIVE STUDY.

Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024

[5]
Metabolic and Bariatric Surgeon Criteria-An International Experts' Consensus.

Obes Surg. 2024-9

[6]
Current status of metabolic surgery in patients with type I diabetes mellitus and obesity: a nationwide multicenter study.

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023-1-20

[7]
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Single Anastomosis Duodenoileostomy with Sleeve: Comparative Analysis of 30-Day Outcomes Using the MBSAQIP.

Obes Surg. 2023-3

[8]
A Comparison Between the Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RNYGB) in Patients With Morbid Obesity: A Meta-Analysis.

Cureus. 2022-11-9

[9]
The utility of intraoperative endoscopy to assist novice surgeons in the detection of gastric stenosis during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

BMC Surg. 2022-8-23

[10]
Change in C-reactive protein after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass through 7 years of follow-up.

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022-7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索