• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)IV级肥胖症患者接受减肥手术的长期安全性和疗效概况。

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Profile of Bariatric Surgery in Patients Classified with ASA IV Status.

作者信息

Jawhar Noura, Abi Mosleh Kamal, Muthusamy Kalpana, Gajjar Aryan, Betancourt Richard S, Laplante Simon J, Kendrick Michael L, Ghanem Omar M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Metabolic and Abdominal Wall Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2025 Mar;35(3):701-714. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07753-4. Epub 2025 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07753-4
PMID:39971869
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is a safe and effective treatment option to reduce weight and manage obesity-related medical conditions in patients with obesity. However, due to limited data, there is uncertainty regarding the short-, mid-, and long-term safety and efficacy profile of MBS in patients with a preoperative ASA IV status.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with ASA IV status who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) between 2008 and 2020. Data collected included operative details; postoperative complications at 30 days, 90 days, and beyond 90 days; BMI changes; and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 60 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Among 131 ASA class IV patients, 43 patients underwent SG (32.8%), 66 patients underwent RYGB (50.4%), and 22 patients underwent BPD-DS (16.8%). The greatest %TWL occurred in the BPD-DS cohort (39.5%) at 24 months post-op followed by the RYGB (32.5%) and SG (20.7%) cohorts (p < 0.001). The overall major 30-day complication rate was 8.4% (n = 11/131), while the overall major 90-day complication rate within the cohort was 6.9% (n = 9/131). The overall major late (> 90 days) complication rate was found to be 14.5% (n = 19/131).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that MBS is relatively safe and effective in ASA IV patients in the short-, mid-, and long-term. Accordingly, careful procedure selection is required in this patient population. Further long-term studies are needed to support our findings.

摘要

引言

代谢和减重手术(MBS)是一种安全有效的治疗选择,可帮助肥胖患者减轻体重并控制肥胖相关的疾病。然而,由于数据有限,对于术前美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为IV级的患者,MBS的短期、中期和长期安全性及疗效尚不明确。

方法

对2008年至2020年间接受袖状胃切除术(SG)、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)或胆胰转流十二指肠转位术(BPD-DS)的ASA IV级患者进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。收集的数据包括手术细节;术后30天、90天及90天以后的并发症;体重指数(BMI)变化;以及术后0、6、12、24、48和60个月时肥胖相关合并症的缓解情况。

结果

在131例ASA IV级患者中,43例接受了SG(32.8%),66例接受了RYGB(50.4%),22例接受了BPD-DS(16.8%)。术后24个月时,BPD-DS组的最大总体体重减轻百分比(%TWL)最高(39.5%),其次是RYGB组(32.5%)和SG组(20.7%)(p < 0.001)。30天总体主要并发症发生率为8.4%(n = 11/131),而该队列中90天总体主要并发症发生率为6.9%(n = 9/131)。总体主要晚期(> 90天)并发症发生率为14.5%(n = 19/131)。

结论

我们的研究表明,MBS在ASA IV级患者的短期、中期和长期治疗中相对安全有效。因此,对于这一患者群体,需要谨慎选择手术方式。需要进一步的长期研究来支持我们的发现。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Profile of Bariatric Surgery in Patients Classified with ASA IV Status.美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)IV级肥胖症患者接受减肥手术的长期安全性和疗效概况。
Obes Surg. 2025 Mar;35(3):701-714. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07753-4. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
2
Ten year comparative analysis of sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m.对 BMI≥50kg/m²患者行袖状胃切除术、Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和胆胰分流十二指肠转位术的 10 年对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):4946-4955. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08850-y. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
3
Comparative early outcomes of three laparoscopic bariatric procedures: sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.三种腹腔镜减重手术的早期对比结果:胃袖状切除术、胃旁路术和胆胰分流十二指肠转位术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 May-Jun;8(3):250-4. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
4
Short-term outcomes of revisional surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: a comparative analysis of re-sleeve, Roux en-Y gastric bypass, duodenal switch (Roux en-Y and single-anastomosis).袖状胃切除术后再次手术的短期疗效:再行袖状胃切除术、Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术、十二指肠转位术(Roux-en-Y 和单吻合术)的对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4644-4652. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07891-z. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
5
Conversion of gastric sleeve to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch: safe and viable options.胃袖状切除术转换为Roux-en-Y胃旁路术及胆胰分流/十二指肠转位术:安全可行的选择。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023 Feb;19(2):131-135. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.10.024. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
6
Tailoring Bariatric Surgery: Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch.定制减肥手术:袖状胃切除术、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和胆胰转流十二指肠转位术。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Aug;28(8):956-961. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0397. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
7
National trends in using revisional surgeries post-sleeve gastrectomy due to reflux and weight recurrence: a matched case-control analysis.因反流和体重复发而进行袖状胃切除术后翻修手术的全国趋势:一项配对病例对照分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2025 Mar;21(3):240-246. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.09.011. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
8
[Analysis of the 1-year curative efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch in patients with super obesity].[袖状胃切除术、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术、袖状胃切除术联合单吻合十二指肠-回肠旁路术以及胆胰转流十二指肠转位术治疗超级肥胖患者的1年疗效分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 25;26(9):859-865. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20221025-00431.
9
Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.基于代谢与减重外科认证和质量改进计划数据库的袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术 30 天结果:首次报告。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 May;14(5):545-551. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
10
Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch results in superior weight loss and diabetes remission in patients with baseline body mass index ≥50.对于基线体重指数≥50的患者,胆胰转流十二指肠转位术能带来更显著的体重减轻和糖尿病缓解效果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2025 May;21(5):548-553. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.11.004. Epub 2024 Dec 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Update on comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss, comorbidities, and quality of life at 5 years.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术比较的最新进展:5 年体重减轻、合并症和生活质量的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02512-1.
2
American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2022 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States.美国代谢与减重外科学会 2022 年美国代谢与减重手术实施预估。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 May;20(5):425-431. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Does ASA classification effectively risk stratify patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a MBSAQIP retrospective cohort of 138,612 of patients.
ASA 分类是否能有效地对接受减重手术的患者进行风险分层:MBSAQIP 回顾性队列研究 138612 例患者。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5687-5695. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10017-w. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
4
Comparison of early post-operative complications in primary and revisional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and duodenal switch MBSAQIP-reported cases from 2015 to 2019.比较 2015 年至 2019 年 MBSAQIP 报告的原发性和翻修腹腔镜袖状胃切除术、胃旁路术和十二指肠转流术的术后早期并发症。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3728-3738. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09796-5. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
5
Duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a perioperative risk comparative analysis of the MBSAQIP Database (2015-2019).十二指肠转流术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:MBSAQIP 数据库(2015-2019 年)的围手术期风险比较分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Feb;18(2):253-259. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.10.014. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
6
Ten year comparative analysis of sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m.对 BMI≥50kg/m²患者行袖状胃切除术、Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和胆胰分流十二指肠转位术的 10 年对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):4946-4955. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08850-y. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
7
Comparative Safety of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass Up to 5 Years After Surgery in Patients With Severe Obesity.肥胖症患者行袖状胃切除术与胃旁路术 5 年后的安全性比较。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Dec 1;156(12):1160-1169. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4981.
8
Hypoalbuminemia Predicts Serious Complications Following Elective Bariatric Surgery.低蛋白血症预测择期减肥手术后严重并发症。
Obes Surg. 2021 Oct;31(10):4519-4527. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05641-1. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
9
Primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass: a propensity-matched comparison of 30-day outcomes.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与胃旁路术:30 天结局的倾向评分匹配比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Jul;17(7):1369-1382. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.01.022. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
10
Characterization of urgent versus nonurgent early readmissions (<30 days) following primary bariatric surgery: a single-institution experience.主要减肥手术后(<30 天)紧急与非紧急早期再入院的特征:单机构经验。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 May;17(5):921-930. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.01.042. Epub 2021 Feb 6.