1 Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
2 Cardiovascular Research Cluster, Universität Bern, Switzerland.
J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Apr;25(2):158-168. doi: 10.1177/1526602818760488.
To report a randomized study that investigated the safety (risk of major bleeds) and potential efficacy of edoxaban, an oral anticoagulant that targets the major components of arterial thrombi, to prevent loss of patency following endovascular treatment (EVT).
Between February 2012 and June 2014, 203 patients who underwent femoropopliteal EVT were randomized to receive aspirin plus edoxaban or aspirin plus clopidogrel for 3 months in the Edoxaban in Peripheral Arterial Disease (ePAD) study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01802775). Randomization assigned 101 patients (mean age 68.0±10.4 years; 67 men) to the edoxaban group and 102 patients (mean age 66.7±8.6 years; 78 men) to the clopidogrel group. The primary safety endpoint was bleeding as classified by the TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) criteria and ISTH (International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis) criteria; the efficacy endpoint was the rate of restenosis/reocclusion.
There were no major or life-threatening bleeding events in the edoxaban group, while there were 2 major and 2 life-threatening bleeding events in the clopidogrel group by the TIMI criteria. By the ISTH classification, there was 1 major and 1 life-threatening bleeding event vs 5 major and 2 life-threatening bleeding events, respectively [relative risk (RR) 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 1.70]. The bleeding risk was not statistically different with either treatment when assessed by TIMI or ISTH. Following 6 months of observation, there was a lower incidence of restenosis/reocclusion with edoxaban compared with clopidogrel (30.9% vs 34.7%; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.34, p=0.643).
These results suggest that patients who have undergone EVT have similar risks for major and life-threatening bleeding events with edoxaban and aspirin compared with clopidogrel and aspirin. The incidence of restenosis/reocclusion events, while not statistically different, was lower with edoxaban and aspirin, but an adequately sized trial will be needed to confirm these findings.
报告一项随机研究,该研究旨在评估口服抗凝剂依度沙班(靶向动脉血栓主要成分)预防血管内治疗(EVT)后再闭塞的安全性(大出血风险)和潜在疗效。
在 2012 年 2 月至 2014 年 6 月期间,对 203 名接受股腘动脉 EVT 的患者进行了随机分组,分别接受阿司匹林加依度沙班或阿司匹林加氯吡格雷治疗 3 个月,这是外周动脉疾病中依度沙班(ePAD)研究(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT01802775)的一部分。随机分配 101 例患者(平均年龄 68.0±10.4 岁;67 例男性)进入依度沙班组,102 例患者(平均年龄 66.7±8.6 岁;78 例男性)进入氯吡格雷组。主要安全性终点是根据 TIMI(血栓溶解心肌梗死)标准和 ISTH(国际血栓与止血学会)标准分类的出血事件;疗效终点是再狭窄/再闭塞的发生率。
依度沙班组无重大或危及生命的出血事件,氯吡格雷组根据 TIMI 标准有 2 例重大和 2 例危及生命的出血事件。根据 ISTH 分类,分别有 1 例重大和 1 例危及生命的出血事件与 5 例重大和 2 例危及生命的出血事件,相对风险(RR)0.20,95%置信区间(CI)0.02 至 1.70。无论使用 TIMI 还是 ISTH 评估,两种治疗方法的出血风险均无统计学差异。经过 6 个月的观察,依度沙班组的再狭窄/再闭塞发生率低于氯吡格雷组(30.9% vs 34.7%;RR 0.89,95%CI 0.59 至 1.34,p=0.643)。
这些结果表明,与氯吡格雷加阿司匹林相比,接受 EVT 的患者使用依度沙班加阿司匹林的大出血和危及生命的出血风险相似。虽然再狭窄/再闭塞事件的发生率无统计学差异,但依度沙班加阿司匹林的发生率较低,但需要进行足够大的试验来证实这些发现。