Mandegaran Ramin, Agrawal Kanhaiyalal, Vijayanathan Sanjay, Gnanasegaran Gopinath
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Nucl Med Commun. 2018 May;39(5):397-404. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000825.
The purpose of this study was to assess the incremental value of technetium-99m-methyl diphosphonate (Tc-MDP) single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) over Tc-MDP two-phase bone scan (TPBS) in the assessment of the patients with pain following knee arthroplasty.
Tc-MDP TPBS and Tc-MDP SPECT/CT were performed in 49 patients with knee pain after knee arthroplasty. The scans were reviewed by two readers (nuclear medicine physician and musculoskeletal radiologist). Tc-MDP SPECT/CT studies were interpreted in conjunction with TPBS in this retrospective study to identify the pain generator in painful knee prosthesis. The final diagnosis was established based on a combination of histopathological/cytological findings, other imaging findings (e.g. MRI, radiolabelled white scan), clinical decisions, and management outcomes (including subsequent intraoperative findings).
In diagnosing infection or aseptic loosening, a definitive outcome regarding the presence/absence of aseptic loosening or periprosthetic infection was obtained in 41 patients. (a) Sensitivity of Tc-MDP SPECT/CT [100%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 66.4-100%] was higher than Tc-MDP TPBS (88.9%; 95% CI: 51.8-99.7%). (b) Specificity of Tc-MDP SPECT/CT (75%; 95% CI: 53.3-90.2%) was considerably higher than Tc-MDP TPBS (30%; 95% CI: 11.9-54.3%). Alternative diagnoses were identified in 21/49 (43%) patients on Tc-MDP SPECT/CT, which could not be ascertained on Tc-MDP TPBS alone.
Tc-MDP SPECT/CT has better sensitivity and specificity compared with Tc-MDP TPBS in diagnosis of aseptic loosening and periprosthestic infection in patients with painful knee arthroplasty. Tc-MDP SPECT/CT identified alternative causes of pain in 43% of patients, which was not identified by Tc-MDP TPBS.
本研究旨在评估锝-99m-亚甲基二膦酸盐(Tc-MDP)单光子发射计算机断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(SPECT/CT)相较于Tc-MDP双相骨扫描(TPBS)在评估膝关节置换术后疼痛患者方面的增量价值。
对49例膝关节置换术后膝关节疼痛的患者进行了Tc-MDP TPBS和Tc-MDP SPECT/CT检查。扫描结果由两位阅片者(核医学医师和肌肉骨骼放射科医师)进行评估。在这项回顾性研究中,Tc-MDP SPECT/CT检查结果结合TPBS检查结果用于确定疼痛性膝关节假体的疼痛根源。最终诊断基于组织病理学/细胞学检查结果、其他影像学检查结果(如MRI、放射性标记白细胞扫描)、临床决策以及治疗结果(包括随后的术中发现)综合得出。
在诊断感染或无菌性松动方面,41例患者得出了关于有无无菌性松动或假体周围感染的确切结果。(a)Tc-MDP SPECT/CT的敏感性[100%;95%置信区间(CI):66.4 - 100%]高于Tc-MDP TPBS(88.9%;95% CI:51.8 - 99.7%)。(b)Tc-MDP SPECT/CT的特异性(75%;95% CI:53.3 - 90.2%)显著高于Tc-MDP TPBS(30%;95% CI:11.9 - 54.3%)。在21/49(43%)的患者中,Tc-MDP SPECT/CT发现了其他诊断结果,而仅通过Tc-MDP TPBS无法确定这些结果。
与Tc-MDP TPBS相比,Tc-MDP SPECT/CT在诊断疼痛性膝关节置换患者的无菌性松动和假体周围感染方面具有更高的敏感性和特异性。Tc-MDP SPECT/CT在43%的患者中发现了疼痛的其他原因,而Tc-MDP TPBS未发现这些原因。