• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变脉络膜高通透性和光动力疗法的仪器差异。

INSTRUMENTAL DIFFERENCE IN ASSESSING CHOROIDAL HYPERPERMEABILITY AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY IN CHRONIC CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea.

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.

出版信息

Retina. 2019 Jul;39(7):1361-1369. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002150.

DOI:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002150
PMID:29554076
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the difference in choroidal hyperpermeability (CH) assessed using digital fundus camera (DFC) and scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) and its effect on photodynamic therapy (PDT) outcomes in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

METHODS

Midphase indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) images were acquired using both DFC and SLO in 38 consecutive eyes with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy in this retrospective study. Scanning laser ophthalmoscope-ICGA was taken immediately after DFC-ICGA. Photodynamic therapy was applied to the area of CH associated with subretinal fluid (CH-SRF). The main outcome measures included the areas of CH in the macula and CH-SRF, resolution of SRF, and change in the best-corrected visual acuity.

RESULTS

Areas of CH (5.187 ± 2.625 mm vs. 3.170 ± 1.661 mm, P < 0.001) and CH-SRF (2.315 ± 1.111 mm vs. 1.465 ± 0.709 mm, P < 0.001) were greater in DFC than in SLO. Sixteen eyes underwent DFC ICGA-guided PDT (DFC-PDT group) and 22 underwent SLO ICGA-guided PDT (SLO-PDT group). Subretinal fluid resolution at 12 months was 100.0% and 90.9% in the DFC-PDT and SLO-PDT groups, respectively, without statistical differences. The improvement of best-corrected visual acuity was earlier in the SLO-PDT group than in the DFC-PDT group (3 months, P = 0.002 vs. 6 months, P = 0.003), but the final best-corrected visual acuity showed no difference.

CONCLUSION

In chronic central serous chorioretinopathy, larger areas of CH and CH-SRF were observed with DFC than with SLO, which caused the ophthalmologists performing ICGA-guided PDT to determine a larger laser spot. This seemed to affect the time of visual recovery, but not the final outcome.

摘要

目的

探讨眼底数字相机(DFC)和扫描激光检眼镜(SLO)评估脉络膜高通透性(CH)的差异及其对慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变光动力疗法(PDT)结果的影响。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,对 38 只连续的慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变眼同时使用 DFC 和 SLO 进行中时吲哚青绿血管造影(ICGA)图像采集。SLO-ICGA 在 DFC-ICGA 后立即进行。将 PDT 应用于与视网膜下液(CH-SRF)相关的 CH 区域。主要观察指标包括黄斑 CH 区和 CH-SRF 区面积、视网膜下液的消退情况以及最佳矫正视力的变化。

结果

DFC 组 CH(5.187±2.625mm 比 3.170±1.661mm,P<0.001)和 CH-SRF(2.315±1.111mm 比 1.465±0.709mm,P<0.001)的面积均大于 SLO 组。16 只眼行 DFC ICGA 引导 PDT(DFC-PDT 组),22 只眼行 SLO ICGA 引导 PDT(SLO-PDT 组)。12 个月时,DFC-PDT 组和 SLO-PDT 组视网膜下液的消退率分别为 100.0%和 90.9%,差异无统计学意义。SLO-PDT 组视力矫正的改善早于 DFC-PDT 组(3 个月,P=0.002 比 6 个月,P=0.003),但最终最佳矫正视力无差异。

结论

在慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变中,DFC 观察到的 CH 和 CH-SRF 区面积大于 SLO,这导致进行 ICGA 引导 PDT 的眼科医生确定了更大的激光光斑。这似乎影响了视力恢复的时间,但不影响最终结果。

相似文献

1
INSTRUMENTAL DIFFERENCE IN ASSESSING CHOROIDAL HYPERPERMEABILITY AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY IN CHRONIC CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY.评估慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变脉络膜高通透性和光动力疗法的仪器差异。
Retina. 2019 Jul;39(7):1361-1369. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002150.
2
Half-fluence photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.半剂量光动力疗法治疗慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变。
Retina. 2013 Feb;33(2):316-23. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318280769c.
3
Clinical characteristics of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy patients with insufficient response to reduced-settings photodynamic therapy.对低剂量光动力疗法反应不足的慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变患者的临床特征
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;256(8):1395-1402. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4003-z. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
Comparison between the outcomes of fluorescein angiography-guided and indocyanine green angiography-guided half-time photodynamic therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy.荧光素血管造影引导与吲哚菁绿血管造影引导半时光动力疗法治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的疗效比较。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020 Sep;31:101955. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101955. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
5
Photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy with subretinal fluid outside the fovea.光动力疗法治疗黄斑中心凹外有视网膜下液的慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;255(10):2029-2035. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3720-z. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
6
OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY-GUIDED PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY FOR ACUTE CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY.光学相干断层扫描血管造影引导光动力疗法治疗急性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变。
Retina. 2021 Jan 1;41(1):189-198. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002795.
7
Effect of Photodynamic Therapy on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Eyes with Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.光动力疗法对慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变患者眼部光学相干断层扫描血管造影的影响。
Ophthalmologica. 2017;237(3):167-172. doi: 10.1159/000456676. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
8
COMPARISON OF PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY USING HALF-DOSE OF VERTEPORFIN OR HALF-FLUENCE OF LASER LIGHT FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY.使用半剂量维替泊芬或半光通量激光进行光动力疗法治疗慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的比较
Retina. 2017 Feb;37(2):325-333. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001138.
9
Half-dose photodynamic therapy followed by diode micropulse laser therapy as treatment for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: evaluation of a prospective treatment protocol.半剂量光动力疗法联合二极管微脉冲激光疗法治疗慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变:一项前瞻性治疗方案的评估
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;94(2):187-97. doi: 10.1111/aos.12938. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
10
Subfoveal choroidal thickness after treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy.治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变后脉络膜的中心凹下厚度。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Sep;117(9):1792-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.023. Epub 2010 May 15.