School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 19;13(3):e0193666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193666. eCollection 2018.
Preterm birth is the leading cause of death among children <5 years of age. Accurate determination of prematurity is necessary to provide appropriate neonatal care and guide preventive measures. To estimate the most accurate method to identify infants at risk for adverse outcomes, we assessed the validity of two widely available methods-last menstrual period (LMP) and the New Ballard (NB) neonatal assessment-against ultrasound in determining gestational age and preterm birth in highland Guatemala.
Pregnant women (n = 188) were recruited with a gestational age <20 weeks and followed until delivery. Ultrasound was performed by trained physicians and LMP was collected during recruitment. NB was performed on infants within 96 hours of birth by trained study nurses. LMP and NB accuracy at determining gestational age and identifying prematurity was assessed by comparing them to ultrasound.
By ultrasound, infant mean gestational age at birth was 38.3 weeks (SD = 1.6) with 16% born at less than 37 gestation. LMP was more accurate than NB (mean difference of +0.13 weeks for LMP and +0.61 weeks for NB). However, LMP and NB estimates had low agreement with ultrasound-determined gestational age (Lin's concordance<0.48 for both methods) and preterm birth (κ<0.29 for both methods). By LMP, 18% were judged premature compared with 6% by NB. LMP underestimated gestational age among women presenting later to prenatal care (0.18 weeks for each additional week). Gestational age for preterm infants was overestimated by nearly one week using LMP and nearly two weeks using NB. New Ballard neuromuscular measurements were more predictive of preterm birth than those measuring physical criteria.
In an indigenous population in highland Guatemala, LMP overestimated prematurity by 2% and NB underestimated prematurity by 10% compared with ultrasound estimates. New, simple and accurate methods are needed to identify preterm birth in resource-limited settings worldwide.
早产是 5 岁以下儿童死亡的主要原因。准确确定早产是提供适当新生儿护理和指导预防措施的必要条件。为了评估确定有不良结局风险的婴儿的最准确方法,我们评估了两种广泛使用的方法——末次月经(LMP)和新生儿 Ballard 评分(NB)——在确定危地马拉高地妊娠年龄和早产方面的有效性。
招募了 188 名妊娠 <20 周的孕妇,并对其进行随访直至分娩。由经过培训的医生进行超声检查,在招募时收集 LMP。由经过培训的研究护士在婴儿出生后 96 小时内进行 NB 检查。通过将 LMP 和 NB 与超声检查结果进行比较,评估其在确定胎龄和早产方面的准确性。
通过超声检查,婴儿出生时的平均胎龄为 38.3 周(标准差=1.6),16%的婴儿胎龄小于 37 周。LMP 比 NB 更准确(LMP 的平均差异为+0.13 周,NB 的平均差异为+0.61 周)。然而,LMP 和 NB 估计值与超声确定的胎龄(两种方法的 Lin 一致性均<0.48)和早产(两种方法的κ值均<0.29)的一致性较低。根据 LMP,18%的孕妇被判断为早产,而根据 NB,只有 6%的孕妇被判断为早产。LMP 会低估在产前检查中较晚就诊的孕妇的胎龄(每增加一周,胎龄低估 0.18 周)。使用 LMP 时,早产儿的胎龄估计值会高估近一周,使用 NB 时,早产儿的胎龄估计值会高估近两周。与评估体格标准的 NB 测量值相比,NB 的神经肌肉测量值对早产的预测更为准确。
在危地马拉高地的一个土著人群中,与超声估计值相比,LMP 高估早产 2%,NB 低估早产 10%。在全球资源有限的情况下,需要新的、简单和准确的方法来识别早产。