Suppr超能文献

是否早产——对巴布亚新几内亚农村地区一组女性的孕周估计值的评估

Preterm or not--an evaluation of estimates of gestational age in a cohort of women from Rural Papua New Guinea.

作者信息

Karl Stephan, Li Wai Suen Connie S N, Unger Holger W, Ome-Kaius Maria, Mola Glen, White Lisa, Wangnapi Regina A, Rogerson Stephen J, Mueller Ivo

机构信息

Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research (PNG IMR), Goroka, Papua New Guinea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 May 6;10(5):e0124286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124286. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of accurate gestational age is required for comprehensive pregnancy care and is an essential component of research evaluating causes of preterm birth. In industrialised countries gestational age is determined with the help of fetal biometry in early pregnancy. Lack of ultrasound and late presentation to antenatal clinic limits this practice in low-resource settings. Instead, clinical estimators of gestational age are used, but their accuracy remains a matter of debate.

METHODS

In a cohort of 688 singleton pregnancies from rural Papua New Guinea, delivery gestational age was calculated from Ballard score, last menstrual period, symphysis-pubis fundal height at first visit and quickening as well as mid- and late pregnancy fetal biometry. Published models using sequential fundal height measurements and corrected last menstrual period to estimate gestational age were also tested. Novel linear models that combined clinical measurements for gestational age estimation were developed. Predictions were compared with the reference early pregnancy ultrasound (<25 gestational weeks) using correlation, regression and Bland-Altman analyses and ranked for their capability to predict preterm birth using the harmonic mean of recall and precision (F-measure).

RESULTS

Average bias between reference ultrasound and clinical methods ranged from 0-11 days (95% confidence levels: 14-42 days). Preterm birth was best predicted by mid-pregnancy ultrasound (F-measure: 0.72), and neuromuscular Ballard score provided the least reliable preterm birth prediction (F-measure: 0.17). The best clinical methods to predict gestational age and preterm birth were last menstrual period and fundal height (F-measures 0.35). A linear model combining both measures improved prediction of preterm birth (F-measure: 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Estimation of gestational age without ultrasound is prone to significant error. In the absence of ultrasound facilities, last menstrual period and fundal height are among the more reliable clinical measures. This study underlines the importance of strengthening ultrasound facilities and developing novel ways to estimate gestational age.

摘要

背景

准确的孕周信息对于全面的孕期护理至关重要,也是评估早产原因的研究的重要组成部分。在工业化国家,孕早期通过胎儿生物测量来确定孕周。在资源匮乏地区,由于缺乏超声设备以及孕妇较晚才到产前诊所就诊,这种方法受到限制。取而代之的是使用孕周的临床评估方法,但其准确性仍存在争议。

方法

在来自巴布亚新几内亚农村的688名单胎妊娠队列中,根据巴拉德评分、末次月经日期、首次就诊时的耻骨联合上子宫高度、胎动开始时间以及孕中期和晚期的胎儿生物测量来计算分娩孕周。还测试了使用连续子宫高度测量和校正后的末次月经日期来估计孕周的已发表模型。开发了结合临床测量来估计孕周的新型线性模型。使用相关性、回归分析和布兰德-奥特曼分析将预测结果与参考早期妊娠超声(妊娠周数<25周)进行比较,并使用召回率和精确率的调和平均值(F值)对预测早产的能力进行排名。

结果

参考超声与临床方法之间的平均偏差范围为0至11天(95%置信区间:14至42天)。孕中期超声对早产的预测效果最佳(F值:0.72),而神经肌肉巴拉德评分对早产的预测最不可靠(F值:0.17)。预测孕周和早产的最佳临床方法是末次月经日期和子宫高度(F值0.35)。结合这两种测量方法的线性模型改善了对早产的预测(F值:0.58)。

结论

不使用超声估计孕周容易出现重大误差。在没有超声设备的情况下,末次月经日期和子宫高度是较可靠的临床测量方法。本研究强调了加强超声设备以及开发估计孕周新方法的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ba8/4422681/63edab199709/pone.0124286.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验