Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Italy.
Local Health Unit, ULSS1-Dolomiti, Belluno, Italy.
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Mar 20;11(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2726-7.
Northeastern Italy is a hotspot for several tick-borne pathogens, transmitted to animals and humans mainly by Ixodes ricinus. Here we compare the results of molecular monitoring of ticks and zoonotic TBPs over a six-year period, with the monitoring of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in an endemic area.
In the period 2011-2016, 2,578 ticks were collected in 38 sites of 20 municipalities of Belluno Province. Individual adults (264), pooled larvae (n = 330) and nymphs (n = 1984) were screened for tick-borne encephalitis virus, Borrelia burgdorferi (s.l.), Rickettsia spp., Babesia spp., Anaplasma phagocytophilum and "Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis" by specific SYBR green real-time PCR assays and sequencing. The spleens of 97 foxes, culled in the period 2015-2017 during sport hunting or population control programs, were also screened. Overall, nine different pathogens were found in I. ricinus nymph and adult ticks: Rickettsia helvetica (3.69%); R. monacensis (0.49%); four species of the B. burgdorferi (s.l.) complex [B. afzelii (1.51%); B. burgdorferi (s.s.) (1.25%); B. garinii (0.18%); and B. valaisiana (0.18%)]; A. phagocytophilum (3.29%); "Candidatus N. mikurensis" (1.73%); and Babesia venatorum (0.04%). Larvae were collected and screened in the first year only and two pools (0.6%) were positive for R. helvetica. Tick-borne encephalitis virus was not found in ticks although human cases do occur in the area. The rate of infection in ticks varied widely according to tick developmental stage, site and year of collection. As expected, adults were the most infected, with 27.6% harboring at least one pathogen compared to 7.3% of nymphs. Pathogens with a minimum infection rate above 1% were recorded every year. None of the pathogens found in ticks were detectable in the foxes, 52 (54%) of which were instead positive for Babesia cf. microti (also referred to as Babesia microti-like, "Theileria annae", "Babesia annae" and "Babesia vulpes").
The results show that foxes cannot be used as sentinel animals to monitor tick-borne pathogens in the specific epidemiological context of northeastern Italy. The high prevalence of Babesia cf. microti in foxes and its absence in ticks strongly suggests that I. ricinus is not the vector of this pathogen.
意大利东北部是几种蜱传病原体的热点地区,这些病原体主要通过蓖子硬蜱传播给动物和人类。在这里,我们比较了在流行地区对 ticks 和人畜共患 TBPs 进行为期六年的分子监测结果。
在 2011 年至 2016 年期间,在 Belluno 省 20 个城市的 38 个地点采集了 2578 只 ticks。对单独的成虫(264 只)、幼虫(n=330)和若虫(n=1984)进行了 tick-borne encephalitis virus、Borrelia burgdorferi(s.l.)、Rickettsia spp.、Babesia spp.、Anaplasma phagocytophilum 和“Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis”的筛查,使用了特定的 SYBR 绿色实时 PCR 检测和测序。还对 2015 年至 2017 年期间在运动狩猎或种群控制计划中被淘汰的 97 只狐狸的脾脏进行了筛查。总体而言,在蓖子硬蜱的若虫和成虫 ticks 中发现了九种不同的病原体:Rickettsia helvetica(3.69%);R. monacensis(0.49%);伯氏疏螺旋体(s.l.)复合体的四个物种[阿氏疏螺旋体(1.51%);博氏疏螺旋体(s.s.)(1.25%);伽氏疏螺旋体(0.18%)和瓦氏疏螺旋体(0.18%)];A. phagocytophilum(3.29%);“Candidatus N. mikurensis”(1.73%);和贝氏巴贝斯虫(0.04%)。幼虫仅在第一年进行了采集和筛查,两个幼虫群(0.6%)对 R. helvetica 呈阳性。尽管该地区确实有人感染 tick-borne encephalitis virus,但在 ticks 中并未发现这种病毒。根据 tick 的发育阶段、采集地点和年份,感染率差异很大。如预期的那样,成虫的感染率最高,有 27.6%的成虫至少携带一种病原体,而若虫的感染率为 7.3%。每年都有感染率超过 1%的病原体被记录。在狐狸中未检测到在 ticks 中发现的任何病原体,其中 52 只(54%)对巴贝斯虫 cf. microti 呈阳性(也称为巴贝斯虫 microti-like、“Theileria annae”、“Babesia annae”和“Babesia vulpes”)。
结果表明,狐狸不能作为监测意大利东北部特定流行病学背景下 tick-borne 病原体的哨点动物。狐狸中高比例的巴贝斯虫 cf. microti 和其在 ticks 中的缺失强烈表明蓖子硬蜱不是这种病原体的传播媒介。