Oliver Vanessa L, Thurston Sarah E, Lofgren Jennifer L
Refinement Enrichment Advancements Laboratory, Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Refinement Enrichment Advancements Laboratory, Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;, Email:
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2018 Mar 1;57(2):186-201.
Recent studies have revealed some of the most frequently used analgesics in mice are not effectively treating postoperative pain. Our laboratory sought to compare and assess the validity and reliability of 2 cageside pain assessments that we recently developed for use in mice-nesting consolidation and grooming transfer tests. We then applied these tests to compare the efficacy of commonly used analgesics-buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg SC every 12 h for 48 h) and carprofen (30 mg/kg in drinking water for 72 h)-alone and in multimodal combination as a refinement for treating postoperative pain in mice. Briefly, C57BL/6 and CD1 male and female mice underwent assessment under conditions of baseline, anesthesia-analgesia, and laparotomy. Results showed that multimodal analgesia displayed the greatest analgesic coverage over the postoperative period, whereas buprenorphine showed slightly less coverage, and carprofen and saline groups displayed signs of pain at most postoperative time points. After anesthesia-analgesia, buprenorphine and multimodal mice lost significant body weight in the absence of a painful stimulus and displayed other significant drug-related changes. Animals treated with carprofen showed few drug-related changes after anesthesia-analgesia but also demonstrated minimal benefit from postsurgical analgesia. Overall, multimodal analgesia was more effective for treating postsurgical pain in mice than the single-analgesic protocols we tested; however, effects on weight loss need to be considered during analgesic selection. Nesting consolidation and grooming transfer tests were valid and highly reliable over time, in inbred and outbred mice, in male and female mice, under different housing conditions. In addition, the nesting consolidation test had excellent reliability between observers. These findings can be used in refining the detection and treatment of postoperative pain in mice.
最近的研究表明,小鼠中一些最常用的镇痛药并不能有效治疗术后疼痛。我们的实验室旨在比较和评估我们最近开发的两种笼旁疼痛评估方法(筑巢巩固和梳理转移测试)在小鼠中的有效性和可靠性。然后,我们应用这些测试来比较常用镇痛药——丁丙诺啡(每12小时皮下注射0.1毫克/千克,持续48小时)和卡洛芬(在饮用水中添加30毫克/千克,持续72小时)单独使用以及联合使用时作为改善小鼠术后疼痛治疗的效果。简而言之,C57BL/6和CD1雄性和雌性小鼠在基线、麻醉镇痛和剖腹手术条件下接受评估。结果显示,多模式镇痛在术后期间显示出最大的镇痛覆盖范围,而丁丙诺啡的覆盖范围略小,卡洛芬和生理盐水组在大多数术后时间点显示出疼痛迹象。麻醉镇痛后,丁丙诺啡和多模式镇痛组的小鼠在没有疼痛刺激的情况下体重显著下降,并表现出其他与药物相关的显著变化。用卡洛芬治疗的动物在麻醉镇痛后几乎没有药物相关变化,但术后镇痛的益处也最小。总体而言,多模式镇痛在治疗小鼠术后疼痛方面比我们测试的单一镇痛方案更有效;然而,在选择镇痛药时需要考虑对体重减轻的影响。筑巢巩固和梳理转移测试在不同的饲养条件下,对近交和远交小鼠、雄性和雌性小鼠来说,随着时间的推移是有效且高度可靠的。此外,筑巢巩固测试在观察者之间具有出色的可靠性。这些发现可用于优化小鼠术后疼痛的检测和治疗。