• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
EEG Correlates of Preparatory Orienting, Contextual Updating, and Inhibition of Sensory Processing in Left Spatial Neglect.左空间忽视中预备定向、情境更新和感觉处理抑制的 EEG 相关物。
J Neurosci. 2018 Apr 11;38(15):3792-3808. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2817-17.2018. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
2
The Hemispheric Distribution of α-Band EEG Activity During Orienting of Attention in Patients with Reduced Awareness of the Left Side of Space (Spatial Neglect).左空间意识降低患者(空间忽视)在注意定向过程中α 波段脑电活动的半球分布。
J Neurosci. 2019 May 29;39(22):4332-4343. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2206-18.2019. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
3
Pupil dilation during orienting of attention and conscious detection of visual targets in patients with left spatial neglect.左侧空间忽视患者在注意力定向和视觉目标的有意识检测过程中的瞳孔扩张。
Cortex. 2021 Jan;134:265-277. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.10.021. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
4
Pre-motor deficits in left spatial neglect: An EEG study on Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and response-related beta oscillatory activity.左侧空间忽略的运动前缺陷:关于条件负变(CNV)和反应相关β振荡活动的 EEG 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Oct;147:107572. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107572. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
5
ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.ERP 证据表明,在不确定环境中注意力成本选择性下降:对注意隐蔽转向的纯前运动皮层解释提出挑战。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2648-57. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 May 26.
6
Left hemispatial neglect and overt orienting in naturalistic conditions: Role of high-level and stimulus-driven signals.左侧空间忽略与自然状态下的外显转向:高水平和刺激驱动信号的作用。
Cortex. 2019 Apr;113:329-346. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.12.022. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
7
Value-driven attentional capture in neglect.价值驱动的忽视性注意捕获。
Cortex. 2018 Dec;109:260-271. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
8
Differential white matter involvement associated with distinct visuospatial deficits after right hemisphere stroke.右侧半球卒中后与不同视觉空间缺陷相关的白质差异受累情况。
Cortex. 2017 Mar;88:81-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.12.009. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
9
Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.调节单侧忽视中的注意偏向:策略集的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2001 Apr;137(3-4):432-44. doi: 10.1007/s002210000642.
10
Effect of working memory load on electrophysiological markers of visuospatial orienting in a spatial cueing task simulating a traffic situation.在模拟交通情景的空间线索任务中工作记忆负荷对视觉空间定向电生理标志物的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2016 Feb;53(2):237-51. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12572. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Target Selection Signals Causally Influence Human Perceptual Decision-Making.目标选择信号对人类感知决策产生因果影响。
J Neurosci. 2025 Jun 11;45(24):e2048242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2048-24.2025.
2
The strength of confidence is involved in controlling the intensity of attentional allocation.信心的力量涉及到控制注意力分配的强度。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):2688. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86160-2.
3
Alpha transcranial alternating current stimulation as add-on to neglect training: a randomized trial.经颅交流电刺激作为偏侧忽略训练的附加治疗:一项随机试验。
Brain Commun. 2024 Aug 30;6(5):fcae287. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae287. eCollection 2024.
4
Enhancing allocation of visual attention with emotional cues presented in two sensory modalities.利用两种感觉模式呈现的情绪线索增强视觉注意力的分配。
Behav Brain Funct. 2022 Sep 22;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12993-022-00195-3.
5
Deficits of hierarchical predictive coding in left spatial neglect.左侧空间忽视中分层预测编码的缺陷。
Brain Commun. 2021 Jun 4;3(2):fcab111. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab111. eCollection 2021.
6
Hemispheric differences in altered reactivity of brain oscillations at rest after posterior lesions.后部病变后静息时脑振荡反应性改变的半球差异。
Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Mar;227(2):709-723. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02279-8. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
7
Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention.解码视觉空间注意力中的注意控制和选择。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Oct 1;41(14):3900-3921. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25094. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
8
Neurophysiological correlates of visuospatial attention and the social dynamics of gaze processing.视觉空间注意力的神经生理学关联及注视加工的社会动态
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Oct;19(5):1218-1230. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00728-w.
9
The Hemispheric Distribution of α-Band EEG Activity During Orienting of Attention in Patients with Reduced Awareness of the Left Side of Space (Spatial Neglect).左空间意识降低患者(空间忽视)在注意定向过程中α 波段脑电活动的半球分布。
J Neurosci. 2019 May 29;39(22):4332-4343. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2206-18.2019. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
10
EEG Microstates Change in Response to Increase in Dopaminergic Stimulation in Typical Parkinson's Disease Patients.典型帕金森病患者中,脑电图微状态随多巴胺能刺激增加而变化。
Front Neurosci. 2018 Oct 15;12:714. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00714. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Cortical and Subcortical Coordination of Visual Spatial Attention Revealed by Simultaneous EEG-fMRI Recording.同步脑电图-功能磁共振成像记录揭示的视觉空间注意的皮质与皮质下协调
J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 16;37(33):7803-7810. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0326-17.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
2
Changes in predictive cuing modulate the hemispheric distribution of the P1 inhibitory response to attentional targets.预测性线索的变化调节了对注意力目标的P1抑制反应的半球分布。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 May;99:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
3
Prism Adaptation Alters Electrophysiological Markers of Attentional Processes in the Healthy Brain.棱镜适应改变健康大脑中注意力过程的电生理标志物。
J Neurosci. 2016 Jan 20;36(3):1019-30. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1153-15.2016.
4
Cue-locked lateralized components in a tactile spatial attention task: Evidence for a functional dissociation between ADAN and LSN.触觉空间注意任务中线索锁定的偏侧化成分:ADAN与LSN功能分离的证据
Psychophysiology. 2016 Apr;53(4):507-17. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12596. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
5
Facilitation and inhibition in attention: Functional dissociation of pre-stimulus alpha activity, P1, and N1 components.注意的促进和抑制:前刺激α活动、P1 和 N1 成分的功能分离。
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.058. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
6
The Response of the Left Ventral Attentional System to Invalid Targets and its Implication for the Spatial Neglect Syndrome: a Multivariate fMRI Investigation.左腹侧注意系统对无效目标的反应及其对空间忽视综合征的意义:一项多变量功能磁共振成像研究
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Dec;26(12):4551-4562. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv208. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
7
AICHA: An atlas of intrinsic connectivity of homotopic areas.AICHA:同伦区域内在连通性图谱。
J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Oct 30;254:46-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
8
Monitoring brain damage using bioimpedance technique in a 3D numerical model of the head.在头部三维数值模型中使用生物阻抗技术监测脑损伤。
Med Eng Phys. 2015 May;37(5):453-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
9
Selective reorienting response of the left hemisphere to invalid visual targets in the right side of space: relevance for the spatial neglect syndrome.左半球对空间右侧无效视觉目标的选择性重新定向反应:与空间忽视综合征的相关性。
Cortex. 2015 Apr;65:31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
10
White matter lesional predictors of chronic visual neglect: a longitudinal study.慢性视觉忽视的白质损伤预测因素:一项纵向研究。
Brain. 2015 Mar;138(Pt 3):746-60. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu389. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

左空间忽视中预备定向、情境更新和感觉处理抑制的 EEG 相关物。

EEG Correlates of Preparatory Orienting, Contextual Updating, and Inhibition of Sensory Processing in Left Spatial Neglect.

机构信息

Fondazione Santa Lucia, Centro Ricerche di Neuropsicologia, IRCCS, 00179 Roma, Italy,

Fondazione Santa Lucia, Centro Ricerche di Neuropsicologia, IRCCS, 00179 Roma, Italy.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2018 Apr 11;38(15):3792-3808. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2817-17.2018. Epub 2018 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2817-17.2018
PMID:29555852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6705915/
Abstract

Studies with event-related potentials have highlighted deficits in the early phases of orienting to left visual targets in right-brain-damaged patients with left spatial neglect (N+). However, brain responses associated with preparatory orienting of attention, with target novelty and with the detection of a match/mismatch between expected and actual targets (contextual updating), have not been explored in N+. Here in a study in healthy humans and brain-damaged patients of both sexes we demonstrate that frontal activity that reflects supramodal mechanisms of attentional orienting (Anterior Directing Attention Negativity, ADAN) is entirely spared in N+. In contrast, posterior responses that mark the early phases of cued orienting (Early Directing Attention Negativity, EDAN) and the setting up of sensory facilitation over the visual cortex (Late Directing Attention Positivity, LDAP) are suppressed in N+. This uncoupling is associated with damage of parietal-frontal white matter. N+ also exhibit exaggerated novelty reaction to targets in the right side of space and reduced novelty reaction for those in the left side (P3a) together with impaired contextual updating (P3b) in the left space. Finally, we highlight a drop in the amplitude and latency of the P1 that over the left hemisphere signals the early blocking of sensory processing in the right space when targets occur in the left one: this identifies a new electrophysiological marker of the rightward attentional bias in N+. The heterogeneous effects and spatial biases produced by localized brain damage on the different phases of attentional processing indicate relevant functional independence among their underlying neural mechanisms and improve the understanding of the spatial neglect syndrome. Our investigation answers important questions: are the different components of preparatory orienting (EDAN, ADAN, LDAP) functionally independent in the healthy brain? Is preparatory orienting of attention spared in left spatial neglect? Does the sparing of preparatory orienting have an impact on deficits in reflexive orienting and in the assignment of behavioral relevance to the left space? We show that supramodal preparatory orienting in frontal areas is entirely spared in neglect patients though this does not counterbalance deficits in preparatory parietal-occipital activity, reflexive orienting, and contextual updating. This points at relevant functional dissociations among different components of attention and suggests that improving voluntary attention in N+ might be behaviorally ineffective unless associated with stimulations boosting the response of posterior parietal-occipital areas.

摘要

研究使用事件相关电位技术,突出了右脑损伤的左侧空间忽略(N+)患者在左侧视觉目标的早期定向阶段的缺陷。然而,与注意的预备定向、目标新颖性以及预期目标与实际目标之间的匹配/不匹配检测(上下文更新)相关的大脑反应尚未在 N+中得到探索。在这里,我们在健康人和男女两性脑损伤患者中进行了一项研究,证明了反映注意定向的超模态机制的额前活动(前定向注意负波,ADAN)在 N+中完全保留。相比之下,标记线索定向早期阶段的后部反应(早期定向注意负波,EDAN)和在视觉皮层上建立感觉促进作用的晚期定向注意正波(LDAP)在 N+中受到抑制。这种分离与顶叶-额叶白质损伤有关。N+也表现出对空间右侧目标的过度新奇反应,而对空间左侧目标的新奇反应减少(P3a),同时在左侧空间的上下文更新受损(P3b)。最后,我们强调了 P1 振幅和潜伏期的下降,当目标出现在左侧时,P1 跨越左半球信号表明右侧空间的感觉处理早期阻塞:这确定了 N+中右侧注意力偏向的新的电生理标记。局部脑损伤对注意加工不同阶段产生的异质效应和空间偏差表明其潜在神经机制之间存在相关的功能独立性,并提高了对空间忽略综合征的理解。我们的研究回答了重要问题:在健康大脑中,预备定向的不同成分(EDAN、ADAN、LDAP)在功能上是否独立?在左侧空间忽略中,注意力的预备定向是否保留?预备定向的保留是否会对反射性定向和将行为相关性分配给左侧空间产生影响?我们表明,尽管预备顶叶-枕叶活动、反射性定向和上下文更新方面的缺陷,但在忽略患者中,额前的超模态预备定向完全保留。这表明注意力的不同成分之间存在相关的功能分离,并表明除非与增强后部顶叶-枕叶区域反应的刺激相结合,否则提高 N+中的自愿注意力可能在行为上无效。