Middag-van Spanje Marij, Nijboer Tanja C W, Schepers Jan, van Heugten Caroline, Sack Alexander T, Schuhmann Teresa
Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
InteraktContour, 8070 AC Nunspeet, The Netherlands.
Brain Commun. 2024 Aug 30;6(5):fcae287. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae287. eCollection 2024.
Visuospatial neglect is a common and debilitating condition following unilateral stroke, significantly impacting cognitive functioning and daily life. There is an urgent need for effective treatments that can provide clinically relevant and sustained benefits. In addition to traditional stroke treatment, non-invasive brain stimulation, such as transcranial alternating current stimulation, shows promise as a complementary approach to enhance stroke recovery. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the additive effects of multi-session transcranial alternating current stimulation at alpha frequency when combined with visual scanning training in chronic stroke patients with visuospatial neglect. In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, we compared the effects of active transcranial alternating current stimulation at alpha frequency to sham (placebo) transcranial alternating current stimulation, both combined with visual scanning training. Both groups received eighteen 40-minute training sessions over a 6-week period. A total of 22 chronic visuospatial neglect patients participated in the study (active group = 12, sham group = 10). The median age was 61.0 years, with a median time since stroke of 36.1 months. We assessed the patients at six time-points: at baseline, after the first, ninth and eighteenth training sessions, as well as 1 week and 3 months following the completion of the combined neuromodulation intervention. The primary outcome measure was the change in performance on a visual search task, specifically the star cancellation task. Secondary outcomes included performance on a visual detection task, two line bisection tasks and three tasks evaluating visuospatial neglect in daily living. We found significantly improved visual search (primary outcome) and visual detection performance in the neglected side in the active transcranial alternating current stimulation group, compared to the sham transcranial alternating current stimulation group. We did not observe stimulation effects on line bisection performance nor in daily living. Time effects were observed on all but one outcome measures. Multi-session transcranial alternating current stimulation combined with visual scanning training may be a more effective treatment for chronic visuospatial neglect than visual scanning training alone. These findings provide valuable insights into novel strategies for stroke recovery, even long after the injury, with the aim of enhancing cognitive rehabilitation outcomes and improving the overall quality of life for individuals affected by this condition. : ClinicalTrials.gov; registration number: NCT05466487; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05466487.
视觉空间忽视是单侧中风后常见且使人衰弱的状况,对认知功能和日常生活有显著影响。迫切需要有效的治疗方法,以提供具有临床相关性且持续的益处。除了传统的中风治疗外,非侵入性脑刺激,如经颅交流电刺激,作为一种辅助方法来促进中风恢复显示出了前景。在当前的研究中,我们旨在评估在患有视觉空间忽视的慢性中风患者中,α频率的多疗程经颅交流电刺激与视觉扫描训练相结合的附加效果。在这项双盲随机对照试验中,我们比较了α频率的有源经颅交流电刺激与假(安慰剂)经颅交流电刺激的效果,两者均与视觉扫描训练相结合。两组在6周内接受了18次每次40分钟的训练课程。共有22名慢性视觉空间忽视患者参与了研究(有源组 = 12名,假手术组 = 10名)。年龄中位数为61.0岁,中风后的时间中位数为36.1个月。我们在六个时间点对患者进行评估:基线时、第一次、第九次和第十八次训练课程后,以及联合神经调节干预完成后的1周和3个月。主要结局指标是视觉搜索任务(特别是星形消除任务)的表现变化。次要结局包括视觉检测任务的表现、两项直线二等分任务以及三项评估日常生活中视觉空间忽视的任务。我们发现,与假经颅交流电刺激组相比,有源经颅交流电刺激组在被忽视侧的视觉搜索(主要结局)和视觉检测表现有显著改善。我们未观察到刺激对直线二等分表现和日常生活的影响。除一项结局指标外,在所有其他结局指标上均观察到了时间效应。多疗程经颅交流电刺激与视觉扫描训练相结合可能比单独的视觉扫描训练对慢性视觉空间忽视更有效。这些发现为中风恢复的新策略提供了有价值的见解,即使在损伤后很长时间也是如此,目的是提高认知康复效果并改善受这种状况影响个体的整体生活质量。:ClinicalTrials.gov;注册号:NCT05466487;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05466487 。