Suppr超能文献

保加利亚作为中等收入欧洲国家的参考国的报销决策过程概述

An Overview of the Reimbursement Decision-Making Processes in Bulgaria As a Reference Country for the Middle-Income European Countries.

作者信息

Kamusheva Maria, Vassileva Mariya, Savova Alexandra, Manova Manoela, Petrova Guenka

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.

National Council on Prices and Reimbursement, Sofia, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2018 Mar 5;6:61. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00061. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Policy makers face a lot of challenges in the process of drug reimbursement decision-making, especially in the context of entering the market of more and more innovative medicinal products (MPs). The aim of the current study is to make an overview of the reimbursement system development and to evaluate the access of innovative medicines, which have entered the EU-market in the period 2015-2017, in Bulgaria as reference example for middle-income European country.

METHODS

A literature and a legislative systematic review regarding the Bulgarian reimbursement system as well as a defining the number of available innovative reimbursed MPs in 2017 in Bulgaria was made.

RESULTS

The reimbursement legislation in Bulgaria is quite unstable due to constant changes, which have been made, especially in the recent years. Despite this fact, the reimbursement process in Bulgaria is in accordance with the Transparency Directive. Bulgarian patients have a relatively delayed access to innovative medicines as only 5% of centrally authorized MPs in 2017 are available in the positive drug list (PDL), 16% of all in 2016 and 18%-in 2015. This could be explained by the long procedure for their appraisal in Bulgaria: the first step is issuing an opinion by the HTA Committee, followed by negotiation of discounts between the marketing authorization holder and the National Health Insurance Fund and making a final decision by the National Council on Prices and Reimbursement (NCPR) for the inclusion into the PDL.

CONCLUSION

Optimization of the procedure for issuing reimbursement status for innovative MPs is needed, such as improvements in the process of conducting HTA reports and their appraisal, incorporation of adequate systems for following the effectiveness and safety of MPs in the real-world conditions, value-based pricing implementation, and increasing the financial control over the health insurance system.

摘要

背景

政策制定者在药品报销决策过程中面临诸多挑战,尤其是在越来越多创新药品进入市场的背景下。本研究的目的是概述报销系统的发展情况,并评估2015 - 2017年期间进入欧盟市场的创新药物在保加利亚的可及性,保加利亚作为中等收入欧洲国家的参考范例。

方法

对保加利亚报销系统进行了文献和立法系统综述,并确定了2017年保加利亚可报销的创新药品数量。

结果

由于不断变化,特别是近年来的变化,保加利亚的报销立法相当不稳定。尽管如此,保加利亚的报销程序符合透明度指令。保加利亚患者获得创新药物的机会相对滞后,因为2017年只有5%的中央授权药品在阳性药品清单(PDL)中可用,2016年为16%,2015年为18%。这可以通过保加利亚对其评估的漫长程序来解释:第一步是卫生技术评估委员会发表意见,随后是营销授权持有人与国家健康保险基金之间协商折扣,最后由国家价格和报销委员会(NCPR)做出纳入PDL的最终决定。

结论

需要优化创新药品报销状态的发布程序,例如改进卫生技术评估报告的撰写和评估过程,纳入在现实世界条件下跟踪药品有效性和安全性的适当系统,实施基于价值的定价,并加强对健康保险系统的财务控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/079d/5845108/ae412dfdb82f/fpubh-06-00061-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验