1 Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Inserm, Unité Réhabilitation chirurgicale mini-invasive et robotisée de l'audition, Paris, France.
2 AP-HP, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Otologie, implants auditifs et chirurgie de la base du crâne, Paris, France.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jun;158(6):1101-1106. doi: 10.1177/0194599818763137. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
Objective To investigate the hearing performance of adult patients presenting unilateral deafness with contralateral fluctuating hearing loss who received a cochlear implant on the deaf side. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting University tertiary referral center. Subjects and Methods Preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, 23 patients underwent pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry with disyllabic and monosyllabic words in a quiet environment and sentences in quiet and noisy (signal-to-noise ratio +10 dB SPL) environments under best-aided conditions. The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) inventory was evaluated preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results No difference was found between pre- and postoperative tests for disyllabic and monosyllabic words. For sentences in quiet and noisy environments, a difference between pre- and postoperative performance was present at 1 year ( P = .002 and P = .02, respectively). In a noisy environment, a difference was present at 6 and 12 months postoperatively as compared with the preoperative value (mean ± SD: 6 months: 42% ± 7.1% vs 61% ± 6.5%, P = .016). A significant improvement in the APHAB score was found at 6 and 12 months postimplantation (Friedman's 2-way analysis of variance by ranks, P < .001). The number of years of hearing deprivation of the deaf ear was not correlated with performance. Conclusion When incapacitating fluctuating hearing loss occurs in patients presenting a contralateral deaf ear, a cochlear implant is indicated in the latter ear, significantly improving performance in noisy conditions and allowing a better quality of communication to be achieved.
研究接受耳聋侧人工耳蜗植入的单侧耳聋伴对侧波动性听力损失的成年患者的听力表现。
病例系列,病历回顾。
大学三级转诊中心。
23 例患者在术前以及术后 6 个月和 12 个月分别接受纯音测听和言语测听,包括在安静环境下的双音节词和单音节词以及在安静和嘈杂(信噪比+10 dB SPL)环境下的句子,均为最佳辅助条件下。术前和术后 6 个月和 12 个月评估了简短听力助听效果问卷(APHAB)。
双音节词和单音节词术前和术后测试无差异。在安静和嘈杂环境下的句子中,术后 1 年时术前和术后表现存在差异(P =.002 和 P =.02)。在嘈杂环境下,与术前值相比,术后 6 个月和 12 个月存在差异(6 个月:42%±7.1%比 61%±6.5%,P =.016)。植入后 6 个月和 12 个月时,APHAB 评分显著提高(弗里德曼 2 路方差分析等级,P <.001)。聋耳失聪年数与听力表现无相关性。
当患者对侧聋耳出现失代偿性波动性听力损失时,应在后者耳植入人工耳蜗,显著改善嘈杂环境下的表现,并能获得更好的沟通质量。