Chiang Ho-Sheng, Huang Ren-Yeong, Weng Pei-Wei, Mau Lian-Ping, Su Chi-Chun, Tsai Yi-Wen Cathy, Wu Yu-Chiao, Chung Chi-Hsiang, Shieh Yi-Shing, Cheng Wan-Chien
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):97-110.
To identify 100 top-cited articles published in periodontal journals and analyse the research trends by using citation analysis.
100 top-cited articles published in periodontal journals were retrieved by searching the database of the ISI Web of Science and Journal Citation reports. For each article, the following principal bibliometric parameters: authorship, geographic and institute origin, manuscript type, study design, scope of study, and citation count of each time period were analysed from 1965 to 2015.
The identified 100 top-cited articles were retrieved from five periodontal journals and citation counts were recorded between 262 and 1,693 times. For the institute of origin, the most productive institute, in terms of the number of 100 top-cited articles published, was the University of Gothenburg (Sweden) (n = 19), followed by the Forsyth Dental Center (USA) (n = 15). Most manuscripts were original research (n = 74), and the inflammatory periodontal disease (n = 59) was the most frequent topic studied. Interestingly, the trend of increase average citation reached significance for implantology (β = 26.75, P = 0.003) and systemic interactions (β = 29.83, P = 0.005), but not for inflammatory disease (β = -10.30, P = 0.248) and tissue regeneration (β = 9.04, P = 0.081). By using multivariable linear regression in a generalised linear model, suitable published journal (Journal of Clinical Periodontology), geographic regions (Europe), more intense international collaboration, adequate manuscript type (review article) and study design (systematic review) could be attributed to escalating average citation counts in implantology (all P < 0.05). However, for systemic interactions, only geographic region and study design were significantly associated with the increasing citation trend.
These principal bibliometric characteristics revealed escalated trends in average citation count in implantology throughout time.
识别发表在牙周病学杂志上被引用次数排名前100的文章，并通过引文分析来分析研究趋势。
通过检索科学引文索引（ISI）数据库和期刊引证报告，获取发表在牙周病学杂志上被引用次数排名前100的文章。对于每篇文章，分析了1965年至2015年期间的以下主要文献计量学参数：作者、地理和机构来源、稿件类型、研究设计、研究范围以及每个时间段的被引用次数。
从五种牙周病学杂志中检索出了被引用次数排名前100的文章，其被引用次数在262次至1693次之间。就发表的100篇被引用次数排名前的文章数量而言，产出最多的机构是哥德堡大学（瑞典）（n = 19），其次是福赛思牙科中心（美国）（n = 15）。大多数稿件为原创研究（n = 74），炎症性牙周病（n = 59）是研究最频繁的主题。有趣的是，种植牙学（β = 26.75，P = 0.003）和全身相互作用（β = 29.83，P = 0.005）的平均被引用次数呈上升趋势且具有统计学意义，但炎症性疾病（β = -10.30，P = 0.248）和组织再生（β = 9.04，P = 0.081）并非如此。通过在广义线性模型中使用多变量线性回归，合适的发表期刊（《临床牙周病学杂志》）、地理区域（欧洲）、更紧密的国际合作、适当的稿件类型（综述文章）和研究设计（系统评价）可归因于种植牙学平均被引用次数的增加（所有P < 0.05）。然而，对于全身相互作用，只有地理区域和研究设计与引用趋势的增加显著相关。
这些主要的文献计量学特征揭示了种植牙学平均被引用次数随时间的上升趋势。
