Tonnaer Franca, Cima Maaike, Arntz Arnoud
Am J Psychol. 2016;129(4):429-441. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.129.4.0429.
The current study investigated whether a multidimensional model could underlie impulsivity and its associations with various disorders in a forensic sample. Data were available from self-report and behavioral impulsivity instruments of 87 forensic patients. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to derive a dimensional impulsivity model, and the relationship between and possible predictive validity of impulsivity dimensions for psychopathology was investigated using product moment correlations and regression analysis. A 3-dimensional model of impulsivity was derived, with factors labeled impulsive decision making, sensation seeking, and response inhibition. Impulsive decision making was a predictor for a history of drug dependence, the impulsive lifestyle facet of psychopathy, and antisocial personality disorder. Sensation seeking was not related to any psychopathology. Inadequate response inhibition was a predictor for drug dependence, psychopathy, and antisocial personality disorder. Given the importance of the concept of impulsivity with regard to forensic risk assessment, the current results replicated earlier impulsivity models and imply that impulsivity is a crucial target for diagnosis and interventions and underlines the importance to consider impulsivity as a multidimensional construct.
当前的研究调查了多维模型是否可能是法医样本中冲动性及其与各种障碍之间关联的基础。数据来自87名法医患者的自我报告和行为冲动性量表。主成分分析(PCA)用于推导一个维度冲动性模型,并使用积差相关和回归分析研究冲动性维度与精神病理学之间的关系及其可能的预测效度。得出了一个3维度冲动性模型,其因子分别标记为冲动决策、寻求刺激和反应抑制。冲动决策是药物依赖史、精神病态的冲动生活方式方面以及反社会人格障碍的一个预测指标。寻求刺激与任何精神病理学均无关联。反应抑制不足是药物依赖、精神病态和反社会人格障碍的一个预测指标。鉴于冲动性概念在法医风险评估方面的重要性,当前结果复制了早期的冲动性模型,并表明冲动性是诊断和干预的关键目标,强调了将冲动性视为一个多维结构的重要性。