Tonnaer Franca, Cima Maaike, Arntz Arnoud
*Department of Research, Forensic Psychiatric Centre de Rooyse Wissel, Oostrum; †Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht; ‡Department of Research, Conrisq Group, Zetten; §Department of Developmental Psychopathology, Radboud University, Nijmegen; and ∥Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016 Apr;204(4):280-6. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000485.
This study investigated whether executive dysfunction and impulsivity are both predictors of reactive aggression and is the first to use behavioral assessment of aggression in response to provocation by means of a personalized boxing body opponent bag giving harassing feedback. Aggressive behavior, self-reported aggression, executive functioning (ie, working memory, flexibility, and divided attention), and impulsivity dimensions (i.e., Sensation Seeking, Impulsive Decision Making, and [inadequate] Response Inhibition) were measured in 44 incarcerated psychiatric patients. Results show that both executive functioning (working memory) and impulsivity (Impulsive Decision Making) predicted self-reported reactive aggression, whereas Response Inhibition was the only predictor for reactive aggressive behavioral responses. The study suggests that Response Inhibition is a stronger predictor of reactive aggressive behavior than executive capacities of working memory, flexibility, and divided attention. Therefore, future research should investigate whether (inadequate) Response Inhibition could also be a valuable predictor for violent recidivism.
本研究调查了执行功能障碍和冲动性是否都是反应性攻击行为的预测因素,并且首次通过使用个性化拳击人体沙袋并给予骚扰性反馈的方式,对挑衅引发的攻击行为进行行为评估。对44名被监禁的精神病患者测量了攻击行为、自我报告的攻击性、执行功能(即工作记忆、灵活性和分散注意力)以及冲动性维度(即感觉寻求、冲动决策和[不足的]反应抑制)。结果表明,执行功能(工作记忆)和冲动性(冲动决策)都能预测自我报告的反应性攻击行为,而反应抑制是反应性攻击行为反应的唯一预测因素。该研究表明,反应抑制比工作记忆、灵活性和分散注意力的执行能力更能预测反应性攻击行为。因此,未来的研究应该调查(不足的)反应抑制是否也可能是暴力再犯的一个有价值的预测因素。