Danno Karine, Duru Gérard, Vetel Jean Marie
Laboratoires Boiron, Messimy, France.
Cyklad Group, Lyon, France.
Homeopathy. 2018 May;107(2):81-89. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1636536. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
The increasing use of psychotropic drugs to treat anxiety and depressive disorders (ADDs) is concerning. According to the study, 'Etude Pharmacoépidémiologique de l'Impact de Santé Publique des modes de prise en charge pour 3 groupes de pathologies' (EPI3)-LASER, adult ADD patients who consult a general practitioner prescribing homeopathic medicines (GP-Ho) report less psychotropic drug use and are marginally more likely to experience clinical improvement than those receiving conventional care. We determined whether these observations also apply to patients ≥ 65 years old in the EPI3 cohort.
The EPI3-LASER study, conducted in France between March 2007 and July 2008, was a nationwide, observational survey of the three most common reasons for primary care consultation, including ADD, and the impact of the GPs' prescribing preferences: homeopathy (GP-Ho), conventional medicines (GP-CM) or mixed prescriptions (GP-Mx). This sub-analysis included 110 patients ≥ 65 years old with ADD from the EPI3 cohort who consulted either a GP-CM or GP-Ho. Socio-demographic and medical data and details of any medications prescribed were collected at inclusion. Information regarding the patients' functional status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS)]) was obtained via a telephone interview 72 hours after inclusion, and at 1, 3 and 12 months post-inclusion. Medication use and outcome were determined over the 12-month period. Differences between the GP-CM and GP-Ho groups were assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.
One hundred and ten patients were recruited and 87 (79.1%) with ADD (HADS ≥ 9) at the 72-hour interview were evaluated (age range: 65-93 years, 82.8% female). Patients who consulted a GP-Ho were more likely (odds ratio [OR] = 10.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33-81.07) to have clinical improvement (HADS < 9) after 12 months than those in the GP-CM group. Patients who consulted a GP-Ho reported less psychotropic drug use (OR = 22.31 [95% CI: 2.20-226.31]) and benzodiazepine use (OR = 60.63 [95% CI: 5.75-639.5]) than GP-CM patients.
Management of ADD patients aged ≥ 65 years by GP-Ho appears to have a real public health interest in terms of effectiveness and lower psychotropic drug use.
越来越多地使用精神药物治疗焦虑和抑郁障碍(ADDs)令人担忧。根据“3组疾病治疗方式对公共卫生影响的药物流行病学研究”(EPI3)-激光研究,咨询开具顺势疗法药物的全科医生(GP-Ho)的成年ADD患者报告使用精神药物较少,并且与接受传统治疗的患者相比,临床改善的可能性略高。我们确定这些观察结果是否也适用于EPI3队列中≥65岁的患者。
2007年3月至2008年7月在法国进行的EPI3-激光研究是一项全国性的观察性调查,涉及初级保健咨询的三个最常见原因,包括ADD,以及全科医生的处方偏好的影响:顺势疗法(GP-Ho)、传统药物(GP-CM)或混合处方(GP-Mx)。这项亚分析纳入了EPI3队列中110名≥65岁的ADD患者,他们咨询了GP-CM或GP-Ho。纳入时收集了社会人口统计学和医疗数据以及所开任何药物的详细信息。在纳入后72小时以及纳入后1、3和12个月通过电话访谈获得有关患者功能状态(医院焦虑和抑郁量表[HADS])的信息。在12个月期间确定药物使用情况和结果。通过多变量逻辑回归分析评估GP-CM组和GP-Ho组之间的差异。
招募了110名患者,在72小时访谈时有87名(79.1%)患有ADD(HADS≥9)的患者接受了评估(年龄范围:65 - 93岁,82.8%为女性)。咨询GP-Ho的患者在12个月后比GP-CM组的患者更有可能(优势比[OR]=10.38,95%置信区间[CI]:1.33 - 81.07)实现临床改善(HADS<9)。咨询GP-Ho的患者报告使用精神药物(OR=22.31[95%CI:2.20 - 226.31])和苯二氮䓬类药物(OR=60.63[95%CI:5.75 - 639.5])比GP-CM患者少。
就有效性和较低的精神药物使用而言,GP-Ho对≥65岁的ADD患者的管理似乎具有真正的公共卫生意义。